Skip to main content
. 2024 Jul 28;16(8):1000. doi: 10.3390/pharmaceutics16081000

Table 2.

In vitro evaluation of the CXCR4 antagonists in the competition binding and signalling experiments.

Compound Competition Binding Assay a
IC50 (nM)
Ca2+ Signalling Assay b
IC50 (nM)
12G5 CXCL12 CCL5 CXCL12 CCL3L1
Cu2L1 50.1 ± 7.2 5.1 ± 0.9 >1000 113 ± 12.7 >20,000
Zn2L1 5.9 ± 2.4 0.41 ± 0.03 >1000 4.9 ± 2.9 >2000
Cu2L2 465 ± 155 8.9 ± 1.1 >1000 185 ± 75 >20,000
Zn2L2 1.4 ± 0.4 0.43 ± 0.00 255 ± 58 5.6 ± 1.9 120 ± 28
Cu2L3 1.12 ± 0.15 0.54 ± 0.03 741 ± 145 3.1 ± 0.3 [23] >1000
Zn2L3 1.9 ± 0.3 0.90 ± 0.23 >1000 17.5 ± 11.7 >5000
Cu2L4 1.3 ± 0.4 0.53 ± 0.03 702 ± 219 11.9 ± 8.3 >10,000
Zn2L4 3.4 ± 0.2 2.1 ± 0.1 >1000 66.1 ± 0.9 >20,000
Cu2L5 1.9 ± 0.6 0.83 ± 0.02 >1000 11.3 ± 4.7 >15,000
Zn2L5 8.6 ± 4.7 0.49 ± 0.01 >1000 10.3 ± 6.6 >20,000
AMD3100 83.7 ± 8.3 18.0 ± 4.2 [37] >1000 203.5 ± 19.4 [23] >20,000
Maraviroc - >1000 10.3 ± 3.5 >20,000 3.1 ± 0.6

a Concentration required to inhibit the binding of PE-conjugated anti-CXCR4 mAb (12G5) in T-lymphocytes or the binding of AF647-labelled chemokines CXCL12 or CCL5 in PMBCs by 50%. b Concentration required to inhibit chemokine-induced Ca2+ signalling in CXCR4- and CCR5-transfected cells by 50%. Data are presented as the mean ± SEM of two to three experiments.