Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2024 Aug 29.
Published in final edited form as: J Hydrol (Amst). 2023 May 1;620(A):129422. doi: 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2023.129422

Table 2.

Reach-scale morphology, subsurface flow capacity, and likelihood of streamflow presence within Falling Rock. Flow-state sensors were placed in four reaches, as recorded in the last column and shown in Fig. 1. Reach ID 3802 is the most downstream reach.

Reach no. Strahler Order Slope (m m−1) Upstream Area (m2) Qsub,c (m3 hr−1) Likelihood Streamflow Present Flow-state sensor designation
1 4 0.03 954,609 0.0287 100  
2 4 0.02 916,783 0.0255 100
3 4 0.02 898,584 0.026 100 FC1
4 4 0.03 785,984 0.0276 100
5 3 0.04 482,728 0.0394 100
6 3 0.05 300,299 0.0547 100
7 3 0.04 263,696 0.0416 100
8 3 0.03 219,253 0.0362 100 FC2
9 3 0.05 220,585 0.0518 100
10 3 0.06 117,539 0.0647 100
11 2 0.06 174,347 0.0614 100
12 2 0.14 52,007 0.1444 86.5
13 2 0.16 69,432 0.1727 98.1
14 2 0.14 57,838 0.152 85.8 FC3
15 2 0.08 92,160 0.0884 100
16 2 0.16 90,109 0.1708 98.5
17 1 0.32 15,737 0.3434 31.1
18 1 0.36 9,921 0.3851 1.9
19 1 0.36 21,300 0.3784 21.6
20 1 0.45 25,755 0.475 65.7
21 1 0.2 71,803 0.2084 43.9
22 1 0.18 54,620 0.1883 56.6
23 1 0.35 21,383 0.3697 2.1
24 1 0.4 10,251 0.4228 26
25 1 0.43 15,732 0.4508 22.8 FC4
26 1 0.46 21,102 0.4862 0
27 1 0.42 20,006 0.4448 37.2
28 1 0.23 18,446 0.2439 46.8
29 1 0.36 10,148 0.3782 32.4
30 1 0.42 22,004 0.4422 31.6
31 1 0.4 20,894 0.4223 71.4
32 1 0.22 77,674 0.2297 52.4
33 1 0.23 59,307 0.2434 10.2