Skip to main content
. 2024 Aug 29;25:676. doi: 10.1186/s12891-024-07778-3

Table 1.

Characteristics of participants (n = 15)

Pseudonym Gender Age Work status IMD quintile* Revision procedure Indication Months since revision surgery Years since primary knee replacement Number of operations since primary joint replacement
Gwen Female 76 Retired 4 Single Stage Instability 8 13 1
Rory Male 63 Working fulltime 3 Two Stage Loosening / wear 7 2 4
Anne Female 68 Retired 2 Single Stage Loosening / wear 8 5 0
Neville Male 67 Retired 4 Single Stage Loosening / wear 6 9 2
Bob Male 76 Retired 5 Single Stage Instability 8 1 1
John Male 81 Retired 5 Single Stage OA Progression 8 5 0
Elaine Female 75 Retired 5 Single Stage OA Progression 8 1 0
Helen Female 81 Retired 4 Single Stage Loosening / wear 8 0.5 0
Mark Male 54 Unable to work 1 Single Stage Loosening / wear 7 17 5
Dianne Female 66 Working part-time 4 Single Stage Fractured bearing 10 10 0
Frank Male 72 Retired 4 Single Stage Dislocated bearing 8 1 1
Gayle Female 67 Working part-time 5 Single Stage OA Progression 6 16 0
June Female 76 Retired 4 Single Stage OA Progression 6 18 1
Trevor Male 62 Working part-time 2 Single Stage OA Progression 6 17 0
Ruth Female 68 Working part-time 2 Single Stage OA Progression 10 2 1

* Index of Multiple Deprivation presented by quintiles: quintile 1 being most deprived and quintile 5 being least deprived