Skip to main content
. 2024 Jul 22;38(9):5137–5147. doi: 10.1007/s00464-024-11049-6

Table 2.

State-of-the-art studies proposing surgical skill and subtask classification models

Author Year Population Setting Tasks Data Classes Model* Accuracy
Wang Y. et al. [35] 2021 18 RAS, laboratory setting suturing video recordings skill level: novice, intermediate, expert DL 83%
Soangra et al. [36] 2022 26 laparoscopic simulator and RAS, laboratory setting peg transfer, knot tying kinematic data and electromyogram skill level: novice, intermediate, expert ML 58%
Law et al. [37] 2017 29 RAS, operating room robotic prostatectomy video recordings skill level: binary (good vs. poor) DL, ML 0.92
Natheir et al. [38] 2023 21

three simulated brain tumor resection procedures on the

neuroVR™ platform, laboratory setting

brain tumor resection procedures EEG skill level: binary (skilled vs. less skilled) ML 85%
Zappella et al. [39] 2013 8 RAS, laboratory setting suturing, needle passing, knot tying video and kinematic data task detection: suturing, needle passing, knot tying DL, ML 80%–94%
Wang et al. [40] 2018 8 RAS, laboratory setting suturing, needle passing, knot tying video and kinematic data skill level: novice, intermediate, expert DL 91%–95%
Current study 2024 11 RAS, operating room blunt, cold sharp, and thermal dissection subtasks throughout cystectomy, hysterectomy, and nephrectomy operations EEG and eye-tracking skill level (inexperienced, competent, experienced) and subtask type (blunt, cold sharp, and thermal dissection); 9 classes ML 83%–88%

*ML Machine Learning, DL Deep Learning