Skip to main content
. 2024 Jun 18;56(7):7748–7760. doi: 10.3758/s13428-024-02448-7

Table 2.

Associations between PCA diagnosis and GILT impairment, with comparison to UKB either without (left) or with documented visual conditions (right). GILT impairment is defined using a standard cut-off (<5th percentile in UKB without visual conditions) using letter-based thresholds at 80% accuracy. Sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive and negative predictive values (PPV; NPV) are presented. Visual conditions in participants reaching the 80% accuracy cut-off are cataract (n=69), amblyopia (n=75), glaucoma (n=46) and low vision (n=4). UKB participants with stroke reaching 80% accuracy cut-off (n=16) have been excluded

Letter-based threshold: 80% accuracy cut-off
PCA diagnosis vs UKB (no visual dx) PCA diagnosis vs UKB (visual dx)
Positive Negative Positive Negative
Positive 15 62 15 9
Negative 3 1695 3 185
Sensitivity 83.3 83.3
Specificity 96.5 95.4
PPV 19.5 62.5
NPV 99.8 98.4