Skip to main content
. 2024 Jul 11;10(3):542–571. doi: 10.3934/microbiol.2024026

Table 2. Effect of bacteria-based products on ruminant performance.

Animal/study design Diet Product Dose Effects Reference
Rumen-fistulated dairy cows F:C was 60:40 Prevotella bryantii (25A) 2 × 1011 cells/dose per animal daily ↕ Feed intake.
↕ Milk production.
↕ Rumen pH.
↓ Ruminal lactate concentration.
↑ Ruminal concentration of NH3-N.
↑ Acetate, butyrate, and branched-chain C4 fatty acid concentrations.
↕ Acidosis.
[37]
Holstein cows Corn and ryegrass silages Combination of Lactobacillus acidophilu NP51 and Propionibacterium freudenreichii NP24 4 × 109 CFU/h per day ↕ Feed intake.
↑ Milk yield.
↑ Energy-corrected milk.
↕ Milk fat and protein percentages.
↑ Milk protein yield.
↕ Respiratory rate, skin temperature, body temperature.
↑ Apparent digestibility.
[75]
Male and female Holstein calves Calf starter feed Megasphaera elsdenii 50 mL oral dose of M. elsdenii NCIMB 41125 (108 CFU/mL) per calf daily ↑ Starter DM intake.
↑ Weaning body weight.
↑ Plasma β-hydroxybutyrate concentration.
↑ Reticulo-rumen weight.
↑ Papillae width and papillae density.
↕ Total VFA, acetate and propionate production.
↑ Butyrate production.
[34]
Crossbreed of Japanese black cattle and Red Angus cattle Total mixed ration Bacillus amyloliquefaciens C-1 and B. subtilis 4 × 1010 CFU/calf daily ↑ Body weight gain.
↑ Feed intake.
↑ Efficient feed conversion rate.
Proteobacteria, Rhodospirillaceae, Campylobacterales, and Butyricimonas.
↓ Pathogens.
Akkermansia.
[40]
Murrah buffalo calves Total mixed ration Lactobacillus acidophilus Fermented milk containing 200 mL/calf/day (108 CFU/mL) ↑ Final body weight.
↑ DM intake.
↑ Average daily gain.
↑ Feed conversion efficiency.
↑ Digestibility of fiber.
↑ The fecal lactobacilli and bifidobacterium population.
↓ Fecal coliform count.
↑ The fecal VFA.
[20]
Murrah buffalo calves Total mixed ration Lactobacillus acidophilus Fermented milk containing 200 mL/calf/day (108 CFU/mL) ↑ Final body weight.
↑ DM intake.
↑ Average daily gain.
↑ Feed conversion efficiency.
↑ Digestibility of fiber.
↑ The fecal lactobacilli and bifidobacterium population.
↓ Fecal coliform count.
↑ The fecal VFA.
[20]
Saanen dairy goats Total mixed ration Bacillus subtilis and Enterococcus faecalis 5 g per goat daily (5 × 1,011 CFU/goat per day) ↑ DM intake.
↑ milk yield.
↑ Protein and lactose percentage with B. subtilis.
↕ Bacterial abundance and diversity.
Succinivibrionaceae.
[76]
Lactating Friesian cows F:C was 50:50 Lactiplantibacillus plantarum, Lactobacillus gasseri, Leuconostoc mesenteroides and Bifidobacterium breve 20 g/kg silage ↓ Silage contents of oxalic acid and fibers.
↑ Silage content non-structural carbohydrate and calcium.
↕ Milk production.
↑ Energy-corrected milk.
↕ Feed efficiency.
↓ Feed intake.
↓ Total ruminal VFA, acetate and propionate concentrations.
↑ Milk total solids, fat, protein and energy.
[77]
Farafra lambs F:C was 40:60 Bacillus subtilis and Phanerochaete chrysosporium 2 and 4 g per lamb daily ↑ Live-weight gain.
↓ Roughage and total feed intake.
↑ Feed efficiency.
↑ Serum total protein, globulin, urea-N, aspartate aminotransferase and alanine aminotransferase.
↑ Hot carcass weight and dressing percentage.
↓ Tail fat and all fat levels.
[39]
Sheep and lambs Concentrate with freely available bean and cereal hay Bacillus subtilis B-2998D, B-3057D, and Bacillus licheniformis B-2999D 1 and 3 g per animal daily ↑ Body weight gain.
↑ Blood total protein, globulins, and urea.
↓ Bilirubin and cholesterol.
↑ Bactericidal and phagocytic index.
↑ Fecal Lactobacillus and Bifidobacterium.
↓ Fecal Escherichia coli, Enterococcus, and yeast.
[43]
Farafra male lambs F:C was 30:70 2 × 1011 CFU of Bacillus subtilis/g or 1 × 1012 CFU of Lactobacillus acidophilus/g or 6 × 108 CFU of Ruminococcus albus/g 4 g product per lamb daily ↑ Growth performance and feed efficiency.
↑ Concentrations of albumin, triiodothyronine, thyroxine, hemoglobin and red blood cells.
↓ Globulin and urea-N.
↑ Hot carcass.
Longissimus dorsi with B. subtilis.
↕ Water holding capacity.
↑ Digestibility of crude protein with B. subtilis.
↑ Digestibility of DM, OM, and fiber with B. subtilis and R. albus.
↕ N intake and urinary N.
↓ Fecal N.
↑ N balance.
↑ Ruminal VFA with B. subtilis and R. albus.
[78]
Lactating Farafra ewes F:C at 40:60 Bacillus subtilis and Bacillus lichenifomis 4 g product/kg DM feed (each g of the product contained 1.75 × 1012 CFU B. subtilis and 1.75 × 1012 CFU B. lichenifomis) ↑ Total intake.
↑ Digestibility of all nutrients.
↑ Concentrations of ruminal ammonia
↑ Concentration of total VFA, acetate and propionate.
↑ Milk production.
↑ Concentrations of milk fat, lactose and energy.
↑ Concentrations of total n3, n6 fatty acids, PUFA and CLA.
↓ Aatherogenicity.
[79]
In vitro (Rumen inoculum was collected from sheep) F:C was 50:50 Bacillus subtilis and Bacillus lichenifomis 4 g product/kg DM feed (each g of the product contained 1.75 × 1012 CFU B. subtilis and 1.75 × 1012 CFU B. lichenifomis) ↓ Asymptotic production of total gas, CH4 and CO2.
↓ Rate of CH4 and CO2.
↑ Lag time of CH4 and CO2 production.
↑ Total bacterial count.
↑ Fermentation pH and VFA.
↓ Protozoal count.
[80]
Ongole breed cattle Lactiplantibacillus plantarum (1.8 × 1010 CFU/mL) 10, 20 and 30 mL/cow daily ↓ Ruminal acetate.
↑ Ruminal propionate.
↓ Ruminal protozoal number.
↕ Ruminal L. plantarum.
↕ Ruminal Ruminococcus flavefaciens.
↕ Ruminal Treponema bryantii.
↑ Ruminal Ruminococcus albus.
[41]
A meta-analysis study Different diets Megasphaera elsdenii Different doses ↑ Ruminal propionate, butyrate, isobutyrate, and valerate.
↓ Ruminal lactic acid concentration, acetate proportion.
↓ Ruminal total bacterial population.
↓ CH4 emission.
↑ Average daily gain and body condition score.
↑ Carcass quality.
↑ Hot carcass weight.
↑ Carcass gain.
↓ Diarrhea, bloat incidences and liver abscess.
[33]

CFU = colony forming unit, CLA = conjugated linoleic acids, DM = dry matter, F:C = Forage:concentrate ratio, PUFA = polyunsaturated fatty acids, VFA = volatile fatty acids, UFA = unsaturated fatty acids, ↑ = increased, ↓ = decreased, ↕ = no effect. Effect is relative to control.