Skip to main content
. 2024 Apr 9;56(7):6826–6861. doi: 10.3758/s13428-024-02395-3

Table 4.

Results of the mixed-effects Poisson regression predicting variability in pseudoword responses. PTAN = number of phonological neighbors; PGTAN = number of phonographic neighbors; p(P|G) = reading consistency, p(G|P) = spelling consistency. P values based on Wald Z-value, *** p < 0.001, ** p < 0.01, * p < 0.05, ~ p < 0.10. R2 = pseudo R2, trigamma estimate (Bartoń, 2022); marginal = fixed effects only, conditional = fixed+random effects

Regressor Estimate Std. Error Wald Z-value p value
(Intercept) – 2.880 0.031 – 91.77 < 2.00E-16***
Lexical Status 0.006 0.032 0.17 0.86227
Syllables – 0.208 0.024 – 8.68 < 2.00E-16***
Phonemes – 0.044 0.022 – 1.98 0.04788*
Phonotactics 0.036 0.023 1.59 0.11256
PTAN – 0.037 0.023 – 1.6 0.10894
PGTAN 0.055 0.018 3.14 0.00167**
Phonographeme_LgFreq 0.217 0.035 6.19 5.95E-10***
Phonographeme p(P|G) 0.367 0.030 12.23 < 2.00E-16***
Onset p(P|G) 0.305 0.024 12.85 < 2.00E-16***
Rime p(P|G) 0.208 0.041 5.07 4.01E-07***
Phonographeme p(G|P) 0.056 0.033 1.73 0.08291~
Rime p(G|P) 0.174 0.040 4.35 1.37E-05***
marginal conditional
R2 57.05% 87.50%