Skip to main content
. 2024 Aug 16;15:1336474. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1336474

Table 3.

Descriptives and bivariate correlations of sex, age, HSPS subfactors, and NEO-PI-R domains (Sample A).

M SD 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
1. Sex
2. Age 39.30 11.14 −0.01
3. AES 16.48 2.82 0.19** 0.12**
4. EOE 29.61 6.43 0.21** 0.11** 0.37**
5. LST 29.60 8.16 0.32** 0.20** 0.50** 0.63**
6. SPS 75.68 14.77 0.30** 0.18** 0.63** 0.85** 0.92**
7. N 109.29 25.54 0.17** −0.12** 0.10** 0.51** 0.30** 0.41**
8. E 89.83 21.48 0.03 −0.13 0.05 −0.43** −0.23** −0.30** −0.31**
9. O 131.23 18.07 0.17** −0.02 0.52** 0.07* 0.23** 0.26** 0.01 0.31**
10. A 122.01 16.96 0.18** 0.10** 0.17** 0.17** 0.16** 0.19** −0.06 0.02 0.28**
11. C 118.76 19.70 −0.02 0.04 0.06* −0.06 0.01 −0.01 −0.30** 0.02 −0.03 0.09**

N = 1,102. *p < 0.05; **p < 0.01. Only correlations of ‘Sex’ are non-parametric (Spearman); Male sex is coded = 1 and female sex is coded = 2; SPS = sum score of all three HSPS-G subfactors; AES, aesthetic sensitivity; EOE, ease of excitation; LST, low sensory threshold; N, neuroticism; E, extraversion; O, openness; A, agreeableness; C, conscientiousness.