Skip to main content
. 2024 Aug 30;23:265. doi: 10.1186/s12936-024-05073-z

Table 1.

Demographics of the study population, parasite density, test positivity (by qPCR) and RDT sensitivity by age group and sex

Parameter Category N qPCR Test positivity [95CI] (n/N) p Geometric Mean parasite density [95CI] p RDT sensitivity1
[95CI] (n/N)
p
Age (years) 0 to 5 35 (7.8%) 48.6% [39.2, 58.0] (17/35) 0.87 78.9 [4.0, 1556.8] 0.02

70.6% [51.6, 89.5]

(12/17)

 < 0.01
6 to 15 111 (24.7%)

46.9% [37.4, 56.3]

(52/111)

41.3 [11.9, 143.3]

73.1% [59.2, 86.9]

(38/52)

 > 15 303 (67.5%)

44.9% [37.7, 52.1]

(136/303)

6.3 [3.1, 12.8]

44.9% [35.5, 54.2]

(61/136)

Sex Male 127 (28.3%)

49.6% [39.8, 59.4]

(63/127)

0.58 12.4 [3.8, 40.1] 0.87 47.6% [35.8, 59.5] (30/63) 0.21
Female 322 (71.7%)

44.1% [36.2, 52.0]

(142/322)

12.6 [6.0, 26.3] 57.0% [46.6, 67.5] (81/142)
Total 449 (100%)

45.7% [38.7, 52.6]

(205/449)

12.5 [6.7, 23.3] 54.2% [44.3, 63.9] (111/205)

1 For the RDT data, the results from all three RDTs were combined, with either RDT and either target (HRP2 or pLDH) positive counting as a positive test