Skip to main content
. 2024 Aug 30;37:e1814. doi: 10.1590/0102-6720202400021e1814

Table 2. Analysis of the quality of evidence (GRADE) in relation to the overall rate of occurrence of the assessed outcomes.

Certainty assessment Patients (n) Certainty of evidence
Outcome follow-up Studies (n) Study design Risk of bias Inconsistency Indirectness Imprecision Others considerations OAGB Control
BMI at 6-month 3 RCT VS Serious
(I2>50)
NS VS None 78 80 ⊕⭘⭕⭕
Very low
BMI at 1-year 4 RCT VS NS NS Serious None 117 129 ⊕⭘⭕⭕
Very low
BMI at 5-year 2 RCT VS NS NS Serious None 82 90 ⊕⭘⭕⭕
Very low
%EWL at 1-year 4 RCT VS Serious
(I2>50)
NS NS None 129 139 ⊕⭘⭕⭕
Very low
%EWL at 5-year 2 RCT VS Serious
(I2>50)
NS VS None 82 90 ⊕⭘⭕⭕
Very low

BMI: body mass index; OAGB: one anastomosis gastric bypass; RCT: randomized controlled trial; VS: very serious; NS: not serious; EWL: excess weight loss.