Skip to main content
. 2024 Feb 3;34(9):5802–5815. doi: 10.1007/s00330-024-10594-x

Table 3.

RQS results according to the six domains and overall, along with the classification accuracy achieved for the MGMT methylation status prediction with models based only on radiomic features

Ref First author RQS AUC
Domain Total score (%)
1 2 3 4 5 6
[32] Calabrese E 2 −2 2 2 0 0 4 (11) 0.70
[33] Chen S 2 −1 2 1 0 0 4 (11) 0.90
[34] Crisi G 1 −2 3 2 0 0 4 (11) 0.84
[35] Do DT 3 −2 2 2 0 2 7 (19) 0.87
[36] Hajianfar G 2 −2 2 2 0 1 5 (14) 0.78
[37] Haubold J 1 5 3 1 0 0 10 (28) 0.74
[38] Haubold J 1 −2 2 2 0 0 3 (8) 0.76
[39] He J 1 −2 4 3 0 0 6 (17) 0.83
[40] Huang WY 2 −2 6 4 0 0 10 (28) 0.86
[41] Huang WY 1 −2 5 5 0 0 9 (25) 0.83
[42] Jiang C 2 6 4 2 0 0 14 (39) 0.90
[43] Kihira S 1 6 3 3 0 0 13 (36) 0.70a
[44] Kihira S 1 −1 5 2 0 0 7 (19) 0.62a
[11] Korfiatis P 2 −2 4 3 0 0 7 (19) 0.85
[14] Le NQK 3 −2 2 2 0 2 7 (19) 0.90
[12] Li ZC 1 6 4 1 0 0 12 (33) 0.88
[45] Lu Y 1 5 4 2 0 0 12 (33) 0.62a
[46] Pasquini L 1 −2 4 3 0 0 6 (17) 0.69
[53] Pease M 2 −2 2 3 0 0 5 (14) 0.92
[47] Sasaki T 2 −2 3 2 0 0 5 (14) 0.71
[48] Shboul ZA 2 5 3 2 0 2 14 (39) 0.70
[15] Sohn B 1 5 3 3 0 0 12 (33) 0.65
[49] Verduin M 0 6 4 3 0 0 13 (36) 0.63
[50] Vils A 1 6 3 2 0 0 12 (33) 0.67
[51] Wei J 3 5 6 2 0 0 16 (44) 0.90
[52] Xi YB 1 6 3 2 0 0 12 (33) 0.80a

Domain 1: protocol quality and stability in image and segmentation (0–5 points); domain 2: feature selection and validation (−8 to 8 points); domain 3: biologic/clinical validation and utility (0–6 points); domain 4: model performance index (0–5 points); domain 5: High level of evidence (0–8 points); domain 6: open science and data (0–4 points)

cv cross-validation, AUC area under the curve, RQS Radiomics Quality Score, MGMT O6-methylguanine-DNA methyltransferase

aAUC was not available for this study and accuracy is reported instead