Skip to main content
. 2024 Aug 1;29(5):e613–e619. doi: 10.4317/medoral.26576

Table 1.

Comparison of clinical data between the alveolar nerve injured and uninjured groups.

Variables uninjured (n=157) injured (n=15) χ2/t p
Age (years) 25.01±7.01 31.87±6.92 -3.625 <0.001
Sex (male) 71 3 3.705 0.054
BMI (kg/m2) 22.91±3.02 23.03±3.28 -0.146 0.884
Number of tooth roots single root 113 11 0.013 0.911
Multiple heel 44 4
Surgery time 10.61±1.28 13.81±1.32 -9.227 <0.001
Whether the number of broken roots (pcs) Yes 2 5 38.835 <0.001
No 155 9
Mandibular canal morphology Oval 42 4 0.033 0.983
Dumbbell-shaped 66 6
Teardrop shape 49 5
Direction of obstruction Vertical obstruction 23 3 0.653 0.721
Sub-mid inclination 110 9
Horizontal obstruction 24 3
Obstruction angle 19 1 4.911 0.178
10° 28 2
40° 50 9
70° 60 3
CEJ distance 1-3mm 9 1 3.914 0.418
4-6mm 28 1
7-9mm 57 9
10-12mm 38 3
>12mm 25 1
Blocking side Right side 81 5 1.826 0.177
Left side 76 10
Whether the molar is curved root Yes 115 2 22.597 <0.001
No 42 13
Is the upper and lower wall of the neural canal clear? Both upper and lower are clear 33 12 25.758 <0.001
The upper wall is not clear, the lower wall is clear 117 2
Upper and lower walls are not clear 7 1
Pell and Gregory classification High 25 7 8.581 0.014
Middle 94 6
Low 38 2
Hypoesthesia of the lower lip - 6 - -
Numbness of the lower lip - 8 - -
Abnormal pain in the lower lip - 7 - -

CEJ, cementoenamel junction