Skip to main content
Heliyon logoLink to Heliyon
. 2024 Aug 8;10(16):e35869. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e35869

Microglia-induced neuroinflammation in hippocampal neurogenesis following traumatic brain injury

Seyedeh Parisa Navabi a, Firuzeh Badreh b, Maryam Khombi Shooshtari a, Somayeh Hajipour a, Sadegh Moradi Vastegani a,, Seyed Esmaeil Khoshnam a,⁎⁎
PMCID: PMC11365414  PMID: 39220913

Abstract

Traumatic brain injury (TBI) is one of the most causes of death and disability among people, leading to a wide range of neurological deficits. The important process of neurogenesis in the hippocampus, which includes the production, maturation and integration of new neurons, is affected by TBI due to microglia activation and the inflammatory response. During brain development, microglia are involved in forming or removing synapses, regulating the number of neurons, and repairing damage. However, in response to injury, activated microglia release a variety of pro-inflammatory cytokines, chemokines and other neurotoxic mediators that exacerbate post-TBI injury.

These microglia-related changes can negatively affect hippocampal neurogenesis and disrupt learning and memory processes. To date, the intracellular signaling pathways that trigger microglia activation following TBI, as well as the effects of microglia on hippocampal neurogenesis, are poorly understood. In this review article, we discuss the effects of microglia-induced neuroinflammation on hippocampal neurogenesis following TBI, as well as the intracellular signaling pathways of microglia activation.

Keywords: Traumatic brain injury, Neuroinflammation, Microglia, Neurogenesis, Hippocampus

Highlights

  • Mitochondrial dysfunction and mtROS following TBI triggers inflammation cascades in microglia through inflammasome.

  • Microglia play key roles in activating and regulating inflammatory signal transduction pathways in different TBI models.

  • Neuro-inflammatory pathways in microglia hinder neuronal stem cell differentiation and proliferation in the hippocampus.

  • Several compounds can improve microglia inflammation and hippocampal neurogenesis by modulating neuro-inflammatory pathways.

1. Introduction

Traumatic brain injury (TBI) as one of the most common causes of death in the world, leads to neurological dysfunction through primary and secondary mechanisms [1]. The focal or diffuse patterns of primary effects characterized by neuronal and vascular damage, myelin loss and reactive gliosis which intensifies by secondary effects, such as mitochondrial dysfunction, disruption of calcium homeostasis, edema, reductions in ATP levels, and apoptosis pathways depending on severity of injuries [2,3]. The primary and secondary injury processes eventually cause neuronal damage, which can be the beginning of disorder in different areas of the nervous system [4].

Studies have shown that TBI alters hippocampal neurogenesis, causing acute loss of newborn neurons and excessive proliferation of progenitor cells [5]. Neurogenesis takes place within a distinct region of the adult hippocampus known as the subgranular zone (SGZ), situated between the hilus of the dentate gyrus (DG) and the granular layer, housing mature neural progenitor cells [6]. Following the division of these progenitor cells, newborn neurons are generated, subsequently migrating to the DG and undergoing differentiation into adult granule cells [7]. The precise extent of adult neurogenesis in the human hippocampus remains uncertain; however, it is estimated to be approximately 30 % of the hippocampal neural network in rodents [8]. The hippocampus is very vulnerable to TBI due to its structure and function. Although not all models of TBI directly cause damage to the hippocampus, most studies have reported the presence of signs of injury following TBI [9]. Consequently, TBI has been shown to adversely impact adult neurogenesis in the hippocampus, thereby contributing to the onset of neurodegenerative conditions such as memory and learning disorders [10].

Many post-traumatic neurological disorders are mediated through inflammatory responses [11]. Inflammatory mediators, which are produced by activated microglia and reactive astrocytes, have been identified as major contributing factor for neurodegenerative conditions [12]. Microglia are macrophage-like cells derived from yolk sac erythro-myeloid precursors that migrate to and distribute throughout the central nervous system (CNS) [13]. Upon exposure to injurious stimuli, microglia initiate an inflammatory response by releasing inflammatory mediators [14]. Additionally, Pro-inflammatory factors have been shown to suppress mitochondrial function. In this context, several studies have underscored the importance of the mitochondria in the processes of survival and differentiation of neural progenitor cell (NPC) in the SGZ [15,16] of the hippocampal DG and SVG [17]. However, innate proliferation of NPCs occur after TBI, but it is insufficient for compensation of cell loss, especially under conditions of inflammation and oxidative stress [18]. Consequently, several therapeutic approaches have progressively focused on post-injury neurogenesis to improve TBI outcomes [19]. In this review, we examine microglia-induced neuroinflammation on hippocampal neurogenesis following TBI. Additionally, we discuss the role of intracellular signaling pathways and mitochondrial dysfunction in microglia activation and polarization.

2. TBI pathogenesis

TBI is a physical injury to brain tissue resulting from an external mechanical force, leading to temporary or permanent neurological deficits [20]. The neurological damages associated with TBI are categorized into two groups: Primary damages caused by mechanical forces at the same time as the insult, and secondary damages that occur in the long term after the trauma [21]. Studies have demonstrated that in cases of moderate to severe TBI, both primary and secondary injuries manifest [22]. Depending on the severity of the injury, patients may experience various symptoms, including cognitive, behavioral, mood, and motor deficits, which can impact their abilities and quality of life [23].

Following TBI, a cascade of cellular and molecular mechanisms is initiated that exacerbate its effects, including oxidative stress, blood-brain barrier (BBB) disruption, neuroinflammation, mitochondrial dysfunction, axonal degeneration, and neuronal apoptosis [24]. BBB disruption resulting from TBI triggers the migration of activated leukocytes into the damaged brain parenchyma [25]. Activated leukocytes and microglia contribute to cytoskeleton disruption and axonal demyelination by producing ROS and inflammatory factors such as cytokines and chemokines [26]. As a result, synaptic transmissions are disturbed, and this axonal damage eventually leads to neurodegeneration [21]. Mitochondrial dysfunction is also implicated in caspase-dependent neuronal apoptosis through the release of cytochrome c and apoptosis-inducing factors [27,28].

3. Adult hippocampal neurogenesis

Numerous studies have demonstrated that neurogenesis occurs in both the hippocampal DG and subventricular zone (SVZ) of lateral ventricles following neurodegenerative diseases such as ischemia, targeted cortical cell ablation, seizure, and various TBI models, including controlled cortical impact (CCI), diffuse traumatic axonal injury, fluid percussion injury (FPI), and closed head injury (CHI) [29]. Additionally, the migration of newly generated cells to the injured brain region has been observed in these conditions [30].Various stages of neurogenesis are estimated by measuring the following markers in the adult hippocampus: Nestin (expressed in precursor cells), Ki-67 (expressed in neuroblasts), DCX (expressed in immature neurons), BrdU (expressed in newborn neurons), and NeuN (expressed in mature neurons) [31]. However, the percentage of differentiation and maturation to new neurons remains typically low due to excessive neurotoxic molecules, inflammation, and lack of trophic signals [32].

Previous studies have shown that moderate-severe CCI enhances BrdU incorporation into newborn neurons as early as 24 h post-injury in several brain regions, including the injured cortex, SVZ, and DG of the hippocampus, which continues for seven days [33]. However, most of the newly generated neurons do not survive, and only some of these newborn neurons express NeuN [5].

Different TBI models show contradictory effects on neurogenesis depending on the severity of injuries. For example, Wang et al. showed that a mild CCI model did not affect neurogenesis, while moderate TBI only stimulated neural stem cells (NSCs) proliferation, and severe TBI increased neurogenesis at all three stages (NSC proliferation, immature neurons, and mature neurons) [10]. NSCs possessing high differentiation potential into new neurons, oligodendrocytes, and astrocytes, play an important role in neural regeneration in neurodegenerative conditions mainly located in two regions of the adult brain: the SGZ [17] and the SVZ [34].

It has been suggested that in moderate TBI, more than 50 % of resident immature neurons are reduced in the SGZ, which is compensated for by proliferation and differentiation of NSCs in the hippocampus [35,36]. These new neurons play a significant role in cognitive tasks [37,38]. Similar to animal models, the expression of NSC protein markers such as DCX, PSA-NCAM, TUC4, SOX2, and NeuroD was also increased in the perilesional cortex of the human brain after TBI compared to the normal brain [38]. Therefore, inducible activation of NSCs can be used as a novel approach to ameliorate TBI-induced disorders [39].

4. Role of microglia in adult hippocampal neurogenesis

Neurogenesis has garnered increasing attention in neurotrauma experiments due to its potential therapeutic role in neural regeneration after injuries. However, the mechanisms regulating neurogenesis after pathological brain injuries remain to be elucidated, and the prominent role of microglia in neurogenesis should not be ignored. In this regard, the potential role of microglia in adult neurogenesis in TBI models also remains unknown [40].

Microglia, as resident immune cells in the brain, morphologically divide into ramified microglia in the healthy CNS and reactive microglia in pathologic condition [41]. Briefly, microglia could regulate cell morphology, cell migration, phagocytosis, and inflammatory response through the expression or production of some mediators such as: 1) Pattern recognition receptors (PRRs) (toll-like receptors (TLRs), nucleotide-binding oligomerization domain (NOD)-like receptors (NLRs), leucine-rich repeat (LRR)-containing receptors, and retinoic acid-inducible gene-1 (RIG-1)-like receptors (RLRs)), 2) Cytokine receptors and cytokine production (tumor necrosis factor-alpha (TNF-α), transforming growth factor-beta (TGF-β), and interleukins), 3) Chemokine receptors (CCR) and chemokine production (C chemokines, CC chemokines, and CX3C chemokines). Among these ligands/receptors, the CX3CL1 (CX3C ligand 1, exclusively expressed in neurons)/CX3CR1 (exclusively expressed in microglia) pathway particularly plays an important role in neuron-microglia communication [42,43].

In the intact brain, ramified microglia regulate adult hippocampal neurogenesis through several mechanisms: 1) increasing the proliferation, migration and differentiation of NPCs in the SGZ, 2) producing growth factors such as insulin-like growth factor 1 (IGF-1) and brain-derived neurotrophic factor (BDNF), and 3) eliminating most NPCs dying in the first few days of their life by phagocytosis [44,45]. Conditioned media containing NPCs and microglia have been shown to have a higher proportion of neuronal differentiation and survival compared to cell culture without microglia [46]. In addition, microglia interact with nearby healthy neurons through the CX3CL1 (Fractalkine)/CX3CR1 signaling pathway to maintain a ramified phenotype and regulate hippocampal neurogenesis. It has been suggested that the reduction in fractalkine signaling may result from increased neuroinflammation, leading to decreased hippocampal neurogenesis [47].

Interestingly, it has been shown that the direct infusion of BDNF, a key factor in neuroblast migration, as well as growth factors into the adult rat hippocampus, significantly enhances BrdU-labeled neurons in the granule layer following a TBI model [5,48]. In line with this, by changing the microglia phenotype toward microglial-expressed BDNF, researchers could achieve prevention of CCI-induced reduction in hippocampal neurogenesis [49]. Thus, microglia in healthy and pathological situations differentially affect hippocampal neurogenesis. For example, healthy microglia promote neurogenesis through phagocytosis of dysfunctional and apoptotic progenitors, support of progenitor migration, synaptic maintenance, secretion of trophic and anti-inflammatory factors, as well as regulation of the CX3CL1/CX3CR1 pathway [42,50]. While pathologically activated microglia prevent neurogenesis through impaired phagocytosis of apoptotic and dysfunctional progenitors, failure of synaptic maintenance, secretion of inflammatory and cytotoxic factors, and dysregulated CX3CL1/CX3CR1 pathway, previous experiments revealed that induction of microglia activation (for example, lipopolysaccharide injection) predominantly inhibits the survival of new cells [42,51]. The comparison between ramified microglia and activated microglia regarding neurogenesis is illustrated in Fig. 2. Conversely, reduction of microglia activation (minocycline or indomethacin treatment) stimulates hippocampal neurogenesis after some neurodegenerative diseases such as epilepsy, cranial irradiation, and ischemic stroke. In contrast with these reports, a recent TBI model by Ng et al. showed that indomethacin, with a 50 % successful decrease in reactive microglia, didn't support neurogenesis in the hippocampus, lateral ventricles, or pericontusional cortex in all stages, possibly due to insufficient reduction of activated microglia [32]. Another TBI model revealed that upregulation of miR-124 contributes to augmenting ramified microglia, increasing BrdU/NeuN in the DG region of the hippocampus, which positively affects neurogenesis [52].

Fig. 2.

Fig. 2

Schematic representation comparing ramified microglia and activated microglia in neurogenesis. In the healthy brain (left side), microglia promote neurogenesis through phagocytosis of dysfunctional and apoptotic progenitors (brown circle), support of progenitor migration, synaptic maintenance, secretion of trophic factors (red star), and communication with nearby neurons through the CX3CR1/CX3CL1 signaling. Interactions between ligands and substrates contribute to the ability of microglia to maintain a surveillant/ramified phenotype. In pathological conditions (right side), activated microglia hinder neurogenesis through impaired phagocytosis of apoptotic and dysfunctional progenitors, synaptic maintenance failure, and secretion of pro-inflammatory and cytotoxic factors. This signaling results in a change in microglia phenotype and function, leading to decreased neurogenesis.

5. Microglia activation and neuroinflammation

Microglia can be categorized into classical (M1, with an amoeboid shape, round, and large cell bodies, neurotoxic) or alternative (M2, with a small cell body, distal branches, neuroprotective) phenotypes [53]. Microglia, depending on the surrounding environment, can switch to another polarization type and may have either inflammatory or anti-inflammatory effects on the CNS, described as a double-edged sword. However, the pattern of microglia activation varies, and there are several intermediate phenotypes (satellite, Keratan sulfate proteoglycan (KSPG), Hoxb8, CD11c, and dark microglia) between them based on proliferation style, chemotaxis, phagocytosis, migration, and cytokine secretion [54]. Therefore, the M1/M2 paradigm is a simplified theory and an inadequate idiom to designate microglia activation accurately. In this way, it has been said that under physiological conditions, the quiescent phenotype (M0) shows an “immune defense” role, which can switch to both M2 phenotype in mild injury (through “find me” signals from the injury site) or M1 phenotype in severe injury (through “eat me” signals from the injury site) [55].

Overall, M1 microglia produce inflammatory factors such as interleukins (IL-6, IL‐1β, or IL‐12), interferon-γ, tumor necrosis factor-alpha (TNF-α), adenine dinucleotide phosphate oxidase (resulting in the production of superoxide and reactive oxygen species), proteolytic enzymes (metalloproteinases, inducible nitric oxide synthase, heme oxygenase 1), CC chemokine ligands, costimulatory molecules (CD36, CD45, CD47), and integrins (CD11b, CD11c), which contribute to neurological damage [56,57]. Meanwhile, M2 microglia produce anti-inflammatory cytokines (transforming growth factor, IL-10), fibroblast growth factor, growth factors, neurotrophic growth factors (BDNF), and pro-survival factors, promoting cell debris phagocytosis to support tissue repair and neuron survival [58]. Many modulators are reported to be involved in this microglia polarization, including different types of receptors, signal transduction pathways, transcription factors, cytokines, chemokines, ion channels, drugs, bioactive compounds, and so on [59]. In this regard, maintaining the balance between microglia M1/M2 phenotypes or shifting microglia towards M2 polarization may present interesting ideas as potential therapeutic approaches in neurodegenerative diseases [60,61].

5.1. Intracellular signaling pathways triggers microglia activation

Signaling pathways governing the TBI-induced brain inflammation have not been fully elucidated. Activation of microglial receptors is mostly accomplished through a variety of intracellular pathways, such as Janus kinase-signal transducer and activator of transcription suppressors of cytokines (JAK/STAT/SOCS), phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase (PI3K)/AKT/mTOR), Akt/GSK-3β/CREB, toll-like receptors4/nuclear factor kappa B (TLR4/NF-kB), CaMKKβ-dependent AMPK/PGC-1α, RAF/MEK/ERK, purinergic 2X7 receptor (P2X7R) and spleen tyrosine kinase (SYK) pathways [62,63]. The intracellular signaling pathways involved in the production of inflammatory cytokines and the activation of microglia are shown in Fig. 1. Additionally, the compounds involved in the regulation of multiple signal transduction pathways following TBI are listed in Table 1.

Fig. 1.

Fig. 1

Schematic overview of various intracellular signaling pathways associated with activation of microglia and production of inflammatory cytokines. In one of these signaling pathways, toll-like receptors (TLRs) activate myeloid differentiation factor 88 (MyD88), which induces production of inflammatory cytokines through downstream pathways of mitogen-activated protein kinases (MAPKs), activator protein-1 (AP-1), and nuclear factor kappa-light-chain-enhancer of activated B cells (NF-κB).In the P2X7 receptor (P2X7R)-dependent signaling pathway, influx of Ca2+ ions increases mitochondrial Ca2+ level, overproduction of adenosine triphosphate (ATP) and reactive oxygen species (ROS), and induces mitochondrial membrane potential (ΔΨmt) collapse, which consequently activates NLRP3 inflammasome and Inflammatory responses. G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) act as regulators of microglial activation that activate NF-κB through the phosphatidylinositol 3-kinases/protein kinase B (PI3K/AKT) signaling pathway and phosphorylation of IκB Kinase Complex (IKK). Splenic tyrosine kinase (SYK) is one of the intracellular regulator of microglial activation that is activated by the B cell receptor (BCR), leading to phosphorylation and activation of the Protein kinase C (PKC) signaling pathway. Notch signaling is involved in microglia activation following notch ligand binding and release of notch intracellular domain (NICD).

Table 1.

Compounds involved in regulation of multiple signal transduction pathways following TBI.

Molecules TBI models Pathways Properties Ref.
Mer CCI model STAT1/SOCS Signaling Important regulator of microglial/macrophage M1/M2 polarization and neuroinflammation [64]
AG490 FeeneyTBI model JAK2/STAT3 pathway Involved in the neurological function recovery after TBI. [65]
RNF6 CCI model JAK/STAT3 pathway Alleviated TBI by Inhibition of RNF6 and suppressing the STAT3 signaling [66]
Sevoflurane FeeneyTBI model PI3K/AKT pathway Reduce neuronal apoptosis by autophagy inhibiting and Attenuate TBI [67]
Dex weight-drop device PI3K-AKT-TOR pathway Suppress autophagy [68]
Tetrahydrocurcumin CCI model PI3K/Akt pathway Reduce apoptosis through modulation autophagy [69]
Simvastatin CCI model PI3K/Akt Pathway Restoration of cognitive function after TBI [70]
FTY720 weight-drop device PI3K/Akt pathway Exerte neuroprotective effects and autophagy [71]
Salidroside CCI model PI3K/Akt pathway Reduce apoptosis [72]
17Beta-estradiol traumatic cerebral contusion Akt pathway inhibit the activation of caspase-3, activates ERK1/2 and Akt at the early stage [73]
ω-3 PUFA FeeneyTBI model HMGB1/TLR4/NF-κB pathway Inhibit TBI-induced microglial activation [74]
Progesterone CCI model TLR4/NF-κB pathway Express proinflammatory cytokines [75]
Resveratrol CCI model TLR4/NF-κB pathway reduces neuronal autophagy and inflammatory reactions [76]
Apocynin CCI model TLR4/NF-κB pathway module neuronal autophagy [77]
hADSC-ex weight-drop device NF-κB pathway Inhibit TBI-induced microglia/macrophage activation [78]
mGlu5 PAM Akt/GSK-3β/CREB reduce pro-inflammatory microglial activation in vitro ([79])
CSF1 transgenic mouse model CREB signaling provide powerful neuroprotective and survival signals in brain injury ([80])
Glycyrrhizin (GL) rat models of TBI HMGB1/TLR4/NF-κB inhibit the expression and release of HMGB1 after TBI ([77])
Curcumin FeeneyTBI model TLR4/MyD88/NF-κB decrease in microglia/macrophages, inflammatory factor release ([81])
Balasubramide CaMKKβ-dependent AMPK/PGC-1α suppress neuroinflammation in vitro and in vivo by modulating microglial activation state ([82])
Trametinib CCI model MEK/ERK suppresses microglia-induced neuroinflammation after TBI animal ([83])

Abbreviations: AKT, Akt kinase; CCI model, controlled cortical impact model; CSFI, Colony-stimulating factor 1; Dex, Dexmedetomidine; HMGB1, High-mobility group box 1; JAK, Janus kinases; Mer, Myeloid-epithelial-reproductive tyrosine kinase; NF-κb, nuclear factor (NF)-κB; ω-3 PUFA, Omega-3 polyunsaturated fatty acid; PI3K, Phosphoinositide 3-kinase; STAT, signal transducers and activator of transcription; SOCS, suppressors of cytokine signaling; TLR4, Toll-like receptor 4.

5.1.1. JAK/STAT/SOCS signaling pathway

JAK/STAT signaling pathway is closely associated with brain injury and has been shown to be activated after TBI. This pathway plays a significant role in anti-inflammatory responses and several other biological processes [84]. There are four JAK tyrosine kinases: JAK1, JAK2, JAK3 and Tyk2 (Non-receptor tyrosine-protein kinase TYK2); and seven STAT transcription factors: STAT1, STAT2, STAT3, STAT4, STAT5a, STAT5b and STAT6 in mammals [85]. Suppressors of cytokine signaling (SOCS) proteins act as a negative regulator of JAK/STAT signaling and are key physiological regulators of inflammation [86,87].

Recently, the important role of SOCS in macrophage function has been reported. SOCS1 has been reported to play a crucial role in regulating macrophage polarization and function [88]. Changes in macrophages have been shown to be influenced by epigenetic mechanisms in which SOCS1 acts as a capacitor for M1/M2 polarization [89]. Upregulation of DNA methyltransferase 1 (DNMT1) appears to be associated with hypermethylation of SOCS1, activation of the JAK2/STAT3 signaling pathway in macrophages and LPS-induced proinflammatory cytokines (TNF-α, leading to the release of IL-6) [90]. These results suggest that loss of SOCS1 expression may induce inflammatory M1 action in macrophages via activation of the JAK/STAT signaling pathway [89].

Both the function and mechanism of SOCS-2 have been reported to involve the SHP2 binding site of the activated growth hormone (GH) receptor, attenuating GH signaling by inhibiting JAK2 and STAT5b axis activation [91]. SOCS2 is believed to be a major controller of macrophage activation. Genetic studies using a transgenic approach have shown that SOCS2-overexpressing transgenic (SOCS2Tg) mice had increased numbers of CD11b + CD206 + M2 macrophages compared to wild-type littermates after mild or moderate TBI, suggesting functional improvement in anti-inflammatory responses [92]. As expected, M1 population was enriched in SOCS2(−/−) mice, and the altered polarization coincided with enhanced IFN-γ-induced STAT1 activation in SOCS2(−/−) macrophages [93]. Additionally, SOCS3 protein is well known to act as a negative regulator of STAT3 (a key physiological regulator in immune homeostasis and disease pathogenesis) [94].In fact, SOCS3 is a cytokine signaling repressor that may inhibit the expression of inflammatory genes in macrophages [95]. There is several evidences suggesting that SOCS3 is involved in modulating macrophages M1/M2 polarization by the transcriptional and post-transcriptional mechanisms [96].

5.1.2. PI3K/Akt/mTOR signaling pathway

The PI3K-AKT/mTOR signaling pathway is composed of two main parts: Phosphatidylinositol-3-kinase (PI3K) and its downstream serine/threonine protein kinase, known as AKT, and mammalian/mechanistic target of rapamycin (mTOR) [97,98]. PI3Ks can be categorized into three specific classes: class I, class II and class III. PI3Ks of class I, are directly activated by tyrosine phosphorylation of cell surface receptors. There are three key subtypes of the main molecule downstream of the PI3K signaling pathway, AKT1, AKT2 and AKT3 [99,100]. AKT1 is highly expressed in many tissues, AKT2 is mainly expressed in insulin-sensitive tissues and is present at low levels in other tissues, and AKT3 is only expressed in the brain and testis [101]. The specific tissue expression patterns of the various AKT subtypes suggest that they play important roles in maintaining physiological function in different tissues [102,103].

mTOR is a member of the PI3K-related kinase protein family that is expressed in different brain regions (16–18). mTOR includes two distinct functional complexes: mTOR complex 1 (mTORC1) and mTOR complex 2 (mTORC2) [104]. Previous evidence has shown that mTOR is a direct substrate for the Akt kinase and has identified Serine 2448 as the Akt target site on mTOR [105]. The PI3K/Akt/mTOR signaling pathway is involved in the expression and production of pro-inflammatory mediators [106,107] and microglial activation [108] in neurological conditions such as brain trauma. The fact that PI3K/Akt/mTOR signaling pathway plays a crucial role in multiple biological activities including cell growth, proliferation and cell survival [109]. Experimental evidence shows that inhibition of this signaling pathway with lipopolysaccharide (LPS) leads to a reduction in the level of proinflammatory factors by microglia activation [107]. Conversely, Activation of PI3K/Akt has been reported to participate in the protection of brain damage by the inhibition of inflammation and apoptosis [110].

5.1.3. Akt/GSK-3β/CREB signaling pathway

In this pathway, Akt phosphorylates the constitutively active serine-threonine kinase GSK-3β at Ser-9 [111], resulting in GSK-3β inhibition [112]. GSK-3β activation is associated with neurodegeneration, and is known to affect transcription factors involved in inflammatory activation [113,114]. Among these transcription factors, CREB - a basic leucine zipper (bZIP) transcription factor - is activated by Akt/GSK-3β signaling [115] to regulate key inflammatory genes, such as IL-10 and TNF-α [116], through GSK-3β inhibition [115].

5.1.4. TLR4/NF-kB signaling pathway

The other signaling pathway that related to neuronal damage after TBI is Toll-like receptor 4 (TLR4)/nuclear factor (NF)-κB signaling pathway [74]. Toll–like receptor 4 (TLR4), a member of the pattern –recognition receptor family, acts as a pathogen/damage molecular patterns in several cell type such as microglia, astrocyte and neurons in the CNS, inducing an inflammatory downstream cascade in response to brain injuries such as trauma, Alzheimer's, or stroke [117]. This receptor activates downstream signaling pathways, such as the nuclear factor (NF)-κB signaling pathway and its cascades, leading to the production of inflammatory cytokines and chemokines [118,119], via the gene expression of mediators such as interleukin-1β (IL- 1β), tumor necrosis factor-α (TNF-α) [120], interleukin-6 (IL-6), intercellular adhesion molecule-1 (ICAM-1), and monocyte chemoattractant protein-1 (MCP-1) [121]. Then, the activation of TLR4 induces NF-κB-dependent apoptosis, expression of proinflammatory factors [122,123], and autophagic neuronal death [121]. However the exact molecular mechanisms underlying autophagy need to be explored further.

5.1.5. CaMKKβ-dependent AMPK/PGC-1α signaling pathway

The other signaling pathway is the CaMKKβ-dependent AMPK/PGC-1α pathway. The AMP-activated protein kinase (AMPK), a conserved serine/threonine kinase, serves as a cellular energy sensor maintaining homeostasis and regulating metabolic pathways [124], including metabolic and functional changes of neurons in brain damage [125]. AMPK can be phosphorylated and activated in response to increase in the intracellular AMP-to-ATP ratio [126], and it has been shown to be associated with the transition of microglia/macrophages from M1 to M2 [127,128]. As a result, it markedly reduces inflammation and inhibits tissue inflammatory damage in various models [129]. Calcium/calmodulin-dependent protein kinase kinase-β (CaMKKβ) is the upstream activator of AMPK, whose activation regulates microglia-induced neuroinflammation [130].

5.1.6. RAF/MEK/ERK signaling pathway

Another pathway that has been implicated in microglial pro-inflammatory responses is the Mitogen-activated protein kinase (MEK)/extracellular signal-regulated protein kinase (ERK) pathway. In fact, the MEK/ERK pathway is important and required for MAPK signal transduction [131,132]. The MAPK signaling transduction pathway is also known as the Ras-Raf-ERK MAPK pathway. In mammals, the MAPK/ERK pathway includes seven transduction families [79]. All families share two serine/threonine kinases and one bispecific threonine/tyrosine [133]. ERK, a member of the MAPK family, which also comprises the MEK1 and MEK2 genes, plays a key role in signaling cascades and transmits extracellular signals to intracellular sites [80]. This pathway is often activated in certain diseases, and the activation of the MAPK/ERK pathway promotes cell aging, apoptosis, and inflammatory responses [134]. Recently, the MEK inhibitor, trametinib has been shown to efficiently suppress microglia-induced neuroinflammation after TBI animal, providing a potentially effective strategy for TBI patients [135].

The MAPK signaling pathway is activated in innate immune cells such as dendritic cells and macrophages as a defense mechanism by TLRs and various cytokines [136]. The MAPK signaling cascade consists of three protein kinases with sequential action: At the beginning of the pathway, there is a MAP3K [also known as MEKK or MKKK] that is phosphorylated and activates the downstream factor MAP2K [also known as MEK or MKK], and finally, the MAPK factor [also known as ERK] is phosphorylated and activated at the end of this pathway [137]. This pathway leads to the expression of the matrix metalloproteinase (MMP) gene, resistance to apoptosis, and cell survival through the activation of many transcription factors such as NF-kB [138].

5.1.7. Notch signaling pathway

The Notch signaling pathway, which is involved in cell-cell contact procedures, encompasses four Notch receptors (NOTCH 1–4) and five ligands of the Delta-Serrate-Lag (DSL) family. The interaction between a transmembrane Notch receptor and a transmembrane ligand of a neighboring cell leads to proteolytic cleavage and the separation of the Notch intracellular domain (NICD), which translocates to the nucleus and acts as a transcriptional co-activator to promote the expression of target genes. This process is involved in stem cell maintenance, proliferation, differentiation, and microglia polarization [60].

5.1.8. P2X7R signaling pathway

P2X receptors (P2XRs) are ATP-gated nonselective cation channels composed of seven subtypes (P2X1–7) and have equal permeability to Na+, K+, and Ca2+ under physiological conditions [139]. Activation of the receptor through the binding of three ATP molecules leads to the rapid opening of the channel and the passage of small ions across the cell membrane [140]. In the central nervous system, P2X7 receptor expression is increased under neuroinflammatory situations in microglia, astrocytes, and oligodendrocytes and also is involved in cerebral neurological damages and edema following TBI or in conditions that cause an increase in extracellular ATP content [141].

5.1.9. SYK signaling pathway

Spleen tyrosine kinase (SYK) is a non-receptor protein tyrosine kinase involved in modulating immune signals in various cells including mast cells, B cells, and macrophages [142]. Activation of Syk leads to the activation of downstream molecules, including MAPK, PI3K, AKT, and NF-κB, leading to the production of proinflammatory and inflammatory mediators by B-cells, mast cells, and macrophages [143,144].

5.1.10. Cell death following microglia activation

Cellular autophagy is the process of destruction and recycling of cellular components by the cell itself. Autophagy can be triggered by traumatic brain injury; however, the role of autophagy in TBI is controversial. Some studies suggest the protective role of autophagy after TBI [145,146], while numerous studies indicate the detrimental role of autophagy after TBI [[77], [81], [147], [148], [149]]. In the latter case, activation of some signaling pathways reduces apoptosis by regulating autophagy in TBI. As mentioned above, the activation of the PI3K/AKT/mTOR pathway provides neuroprotection in TBI via inhibition of autophagy.

Regarding the relation between members, mTORC1 (which consists of mTOR, Raptor, GLβ and some other proteins) acts as a negative modulator of autophagy [82], and the PI3K/AKT signaling pathway acts as a major regulator of mTORC1 [150]. AKT activates mTOR via direct phosphorylation of tuberous sclerosis complex 2 (TSC2) at the serine residue located at position 939 [151]. Phosphorylation of TSC2 leads to Rheb activation, which promotes activation of the mTOR kinase activity [83,152]. Hence, AKT inhibitors suppress mTOR activity, leading to dephosphorylation of Beclin-1 regulator 1 (AMBRA1), activation of unc-51 like autophagy activating kinase 1/2 (ULK1/2) complex, phosphorylation of focal adhesion kinase family interacting protein 200 (FIP200), and subsequent autophagy initiation [153].

Research has demonstrated that Nrf2, a redox-sensitive transcription factor containing a basic leucine zipper domain, possesses the ability to modulate the process of autophagy [154,155]. Zhang et al. [156] found that autophagy after TBI is regulated by Nrf2 and provide neuroprotection, although this connection it not well understood. There are several possible explanations based on the role of p62. P62 binds to ubiquitin chains and leads to the initiation of autophagy [157]. In addition, another study showed that Keap1 uncoupled from Nrf2 can bind to p62, interact with LC3, and transport the conjugated ubiquitin to autophagosome for the degradation process [158].

The mechanism by which Nrf2 regulates autophagy requires further investigation. Secondary injury after TBI can be reduced by FoxO3a, which belongs to the forkhead transcription factor family [159]. This factor has also been confirmed to regulate autophagy. To date the effects of Foxo3a on autophagy have only been presented in TBI models by directly increasing the transcription of autophagy-related proteins (ATGs), such as Beclin-1, LC3, Atg5 and Atg7 [160].

The other factor that regulates autophagy in brain injury models such as TBI is TLR4. A recent study showed that genetic ablation of TLR4 could actively inhibit autophagy and thereby mitigate the neuroinfammatory response after TBI [147]. Also, a NF-kB binding site has been reveal in the Beclin-1 promoter. Therefore, NF-kB activation by TLR4 can up-regulate the expression of Beclin-1 and promote autophagy [161]. This evidence suggests that inhibition of autophagy acts as a potent agent to attenuate TBI-induced brain inflammation.

5.2. Mitochondrial dysfunction triggers microglia activation

Mitochondria play a pivotal role in cell survival, growth, and death. They not only contribute to cellular energy provision via ATP synthesis but also play an essential role in buffering intracellular calcium, producing mitochondrial ROS (mtROS), and regulating apoptosis [[162], [163], [164], [165], [166], [167]]. Mitochondria participate in nearly all cell functions, and their dysfunction is particularly involved in the pathogenic mechanisms following TBI [1]. A growing body of literature has shown that mitochondrial dysfunction is an early event and one of the hallmark events after TBI, contributing to metabolic and physiologic dysregulations that lead to cell death [[168], [169], [170]]. In the experimental models of TBI, mitochondrial dysfunction occurs within 24 h post-injury and can last up to 14 days, resulting in reduced ATP production in cortical and hippocampal tissues [[170], [171], [172]].

Several mechanisms have been suggested for TBI-induced mitochondrial dysfunction. Briefly, intracellular calcium accumulation and the influx of excessive ions into mitochondria result in mtROS production, mitochondrial membrane depolarization, and inhibition of ATP synthesis [21,170,173]. Subsequently, the mitochondrial electron transport chain (ETC) is disrupted, and oxidative phosphorylation processes are impaired, leading to the breakdown of metabolic reactions required for cell survival and intracellular calcium balance [[174], [175], [176]]. These conditions also lead to the opening of the mPTP (mitochondrial permeability transition pore), which increases the permeability of the mitochondrial inner membrane [177,178].

Mitochondrial proteins such as cytochrome c (cytc) and AIF (apoptosis inducing factor) are released to the cytosol and play key role in apoptotic cell death [170,179]. In addition, mitochondrial dysfunction activates the NLRP3 (Nod-like receptor protein 3) inflammasome, which increases the production of pro-inflammatory cytokines such as IL-1β and IL-18 [17,180]. These studies highlight the prominent role of mitochondria in TBI pathophysiology. Therefore, ameliorating mitochondrial function may induce neuroprotection and improve cognition following TBI [168,169]. There is increasing evidence that mitochondrial dysfunction and inflammation are related and exacerbate each other during neurological disorders such as Alzheimer's disease [[181], [182], [183]] Parkinson [184], ischemic stroke [[185], [186], [187]], multiple sclerosis [188], amyotrophic lateral sclerosis [189], and TBI [190].

5.2.1. NLRP3 inflammasome following mitochondrial dysfunction

It has been increasingly suggested that the NLRP3 inflammasome serves as a conduit between mitochondrial dysfunction and pro-inflammatory signaling in the microglial cells [191,192]. Inflammasomes can be activated in response to various infectious or sterile stimuli, such as pathogenic microbes (e.g., parasites, fungi, bacteria, and viruses) and host-derived danger signals (e.g., mitochondrial dysfunction, ROS, ion flux, and metabolic factors), through germline-encoded pattern recognition receptors (PRRs) present on the membrane or within the internal compartments of innate immune system cells [193,194].

Activation of inflammasome sensors (NAIP/NLRC4, NLRP3/6/7, AIM2/IHI16) is usually followed by the initiation of the canonical inflammasome complex through recruitment and formation of pro-caspase-1 filaments [195,196]. Non-canonical inflammasomes are assemblies that activate caspase-11/-8 in mice and caspase −4/-5 in humans. As a result, active caspase-1 or caspase-8 mediate the processing of the inflammatory cytokines IL-1β and IL-18 into mature form. Active caspase-1/-11-/4/-5 can induce pyroptosis or activate the NLRP3 inflammasome through GSDMD cleavage [197].

The NF-κB transcription factor acts as a pivotal mediator of inflammation and innate immunity and is composed of an inactive complex consisting of three subunits: IκB, P65, and P50 [198]. A main regulator of NF-κB signaling pathways is the IκB kinase (IKK) complex, which phosphorylates IκB, leading to the translocation of P50 and P65 to the nucleus, resulting in increased transcription of anti-apoptotic and pro-inflammatory genes [199].

NLRP3 inflammasome activation is a two-step process involving priming and activation. In the first, or priming, step, activation of the NF-κB pathway through TLR and P2X7R receptors leads to up-regulation of NLRP-3, pro-IL-1β and pro-IL-18 proteins. In the second or activating step, oligomerization of NLRP3 occurs through the NACHT domain, which after the polymerization of ASC causes the recruitment and activation of pro-caspase-1. Activated caspase-1 induces cleavage/processing of the cytokines IL-1β and IL-18 for inflammatory responses [200,201].

Mitochondrial dysfunction plays a contributory role in the activation of the NLRP3 inflammasome in the microglial cells [202]. There is evidence that microglia-derived NLRP3 inflammasome is involved in the inflammatory response to TBI, as the use of MCC950 (a selective NLRP3 inflammasome inhibitor) reduces the post-TBI inflammatory response and BBB disruption [203]. While activation of the NLRP3 inflammasome is beneficial for the innate immune responses to the pathogens and tissue injury [204], its overactivity leads to a form of cell necrosis known as pyroptosis [205]. Evidence shows that inhibition of the NLRP3 inflammasome can alleviate neuroinflammation and improve outcomes following TBI. In addition, circulating NLRP3 and its related molecules could be used as potential biomarker for neuroinflammation after TBI [206].

It has recently been shown that extracellular mitochondria (exMTs) released from injured cerebral cells can promote inflammation following TBI [207]. The exMTs is a major source of DAMPs (damage-associated molecular patterns), which could activate the innate immune system and initiate inflammatory responses [[208], [209], [210], [211]]. Several mechanisms contribute in exMTs-induced inflammation. The exMTs can promote the activation of neutrophils and increased its interaction with endothelium [212]. The exMTs released by activated monocytes could induce pro-inflammatory factors such as type I interferon and TNF-α responses in endothelial cells, thus promote inflammation [213]. ExMTs, produced by platelets, serve as a substrate for bactericidal group IIA-secreted phospholipase A2 to promote inflammation [214].

It has also been reported that release of mtDNA (oxidized mitochondrial DNA), mtROS, and cardiolipin can activate the NLRP3 inflammasome [[215], [216], [217], [218]], which discussed below. Activation of the NLRP3 inflammasome stimulates caspase-1 [219,220], which leads to activation and release of IL-1β and IL-18 [221], thus inducing further inflammation [222]. These mitochondrial-related danger signals are initially translated into adaptive responses, and if homeostatic processes cannot be re-established, cell death is executed [223].

Releasing mtDNA from injured mitochondria activates NLRP3 inflammasomes [224,225], and mtROS has been suggested to play a pivotal role in mtDNA release [226]. Additionally, during apoptosis, mtDNA is oxidized by mtROS and released into the cytosol, where it binds to and activates the NLRP3 inflammasome, resulting in increased inflammation [227]. In fact, cytosolic oxidized mtDNA is associated with the NLRP3 inflammasome complex and is required for its activation [228]. The NLRP3 inflammasome induces mitophagy, a process by which cells can clear damaged mitochondria [229]. However, the process of mitophagy in macrophages attenuates NLRP3 inflammasome activity by clearing mtDNA from the cytosol [226].

MtROS was demonstrated to increase after mitochondrial dysfunction, promoting the activation of the NLRP3 inflammasome [230], and could be a direct activator of the NLRP3 inflammasome [216]. In addition to its activator role, mitochondria have also been reported as a docking system for inflammasome assembly [231]. This role of mitochondria is due to the externalization of cardiolipin to the outer membrane, which can interact with pro-caspase-1 and NLRP3 [232]. It has also been suggested that cardiolipin directly binds to the LRRs (leucine-rich repeats) of NLRP3, activating this inflammasome [218].

5.2.2. Cell death following mitochondrial dysfunction

Neuronal and glial cell death, along with traumatic cell injury, participate in the pathogenic mechanisms during TBI [168]. Overall, mitochondrial dysfunction initially activates several devastating cascades after TBI, eventually leading to extensive neuroinflammation and cell death. Three major forms of cell death—apoptosis, necrosis, and autophagy [233]—contribute to cell damage following TBI [168]. Mitochondria are associated with various modes of cell death, and their membrane permeability releases death factors [[234], [235], [236]].

One of the hallmarks of TBI-induced secondary brain injury is apoptotic cell death of neurons and oligodendrocytes [237,238], which can be triggered by the activation and interaction of different pathways, including p38, MAPK, ERK (extracellular signal-regulated kinase), and JAK/STAT (janus kinase/signal transducer and activator of transcription) [239,65]. Mitochondrial dysfunction can induce apoptotic cell death through caspase-dependent mechanisms, known as the intrinsic pathway of apoptosis after TBI [240]. This pathway is activated when cytC is released after mPTP opening, which increases inner membrane permeability and releases pro-apoptotic molecules into the cytoplasm [187,241]. Opening of the mPTP, caused by calcium accumulation, mtROS, and mitochondrial depolarization [[242], [243], [244], [245], [246]], leads to the release of cytC and the initiation of apoptotic cascades [[247], [248], [249], [250]]. CytC forms an ATP-dependent complex with apaf-1(apoptotic-protease-activating factor-1) in the cytosol, triggering caspase-dependent downstream signaling through activation of caspase 8 and 9, ultimately leading to caspase 3 activation [[251], [252], [253], [254]]. Besides, caspase-independent apoptosis in TBI can be activated by the release of mitochondrial proteins such as AIF, HtrA2/OMI (high-temperature requirement protein A), endonuclease-G, SMAC/DIABLO (second mitochondrion-derived activator of caspase/direct inhibitor of apoptosis-binding protein with low pI), alteration of the mitochondrial ETC and cellular redox homeostasis, and loss of mitochondrial transmembrane potential, ultimately causing DNA damage [[255], [256], [257], [258]]. Apoptotic cell death is profoundly regulated by anti-apoptotic proteins such as the B-cell lymphoma-2 (Bcl-2) family and death-inducing factors such as Bcl-2-associated X protein (BAX) [259]. Several studies show that the expression of Bax and BCL-2 proteins is upregulated after TBI, triggering mitochondria-associated apoptotic pathways in traumatic brain [260,261].

Induction of mPTP opening, in addition to the apoptosis process, is involved in inducing autophagic and necroptotic cell death, and increasing protein levels of necroptotic markers (RIPk3 and RIPk1) and autophagy markers (LC3-II/LC3-I ratio and Beclin-1) [262]. It is well-established that the pro-inflammatory M1 phenotype of microglia is associated with enhanced TBI pathogenesis, whereas a switch toward the M2 phenotype is associated with recovery processes [263].

During neuroinflammation, the M1 to M2 switch in microglia may hold beneficial therapeutic potential, as mitochondrial function may determine this microglia differentiation [264]. Activated microglia and brain-infiltrating immune cells can alter mitochondrial metabolism, mtROS formation, and programmed cell death by producing inflammatory mediators such as TNF [264]. Indeed, activated microglia inhibits OXPHOS (oxidative phosphorylation) through TNF production, inducing enhanced mitochondrial ROS [265]. Pro-inflammatory cytokines shift ATP production from OXPHOS to glycolysis in mitochondria, providing the energy required for changing cell function and survival [264]. For example, succinate from the inactive Krebs-cycle can trigger IL-1β production via HIF1-α (hypoxia-inducible factor 1-alpha) [266]. Overall, the activation of the Inflammasome NLRP-3 in pathologic conditions is mediated by two pathways: mitochondrial dysfunction and the activation of multiple intracellular signaling pathways in the M1 phenotype of microglia [267,268].

6. Potential therapeutic compounds toward TBI recovery: the role of microglia

Myeloid-epithelial-reproductive tyrosine kinase (Mer), a member of the Tyro-Axl-Mer (TAM) family of receptor tyrosine kinases [269], plays a key role in the regulation of macrophage inflammatory responses [270] and brain microglial cells [271]. In a recent study, researchers demonstrated that induction of STAT1/SOCS signaling in the brain tissues of TBI-injured mice via Mer activation leads to increased M2-like polarization of microglia/macrophages [64].

Moreover, Raible et al. suggested that the severity of injury affects the magnitude of JAK/STAT pathway activation in animal model of TBI [272]. In this study, by inhibiting the activation of the JAK2/STAT3 pathway in TBI rats, TBI symptoms were ameliorated after administration of AG490. Another study showed that RNF6 inhibition can suppress the activation of STAT3 by JAK [66]. The neuroprotective effects of Dexmedetomidine (Dex) have been studied in rats exposed to TBI. When Dex was administered to TBI rats, concomitantly with increased levels of p-Akt and p-mTOR, decreased levels of microtubule-associated protein 1 light chain 3 (LC3) and Beclin-1 were observed. These results suggest that Dex can suppress autophagy via the activation of the PI3K-AKT-TOR pathway [68]. In addition, several studies on neuroprotective factors such as tetrahydrocurcumin [69], simvastatin [70], FTY720 [71], salidroside [72], and estradiol [73] have reported that activation of the PI3K/AKT pathway has potential therapeutic effects for TBI.

However, emerging evidence has suggested that PI3K/AKT pathway activation plays a critical role in anti-apoptotic and anti-autophagy responses for neuroprotection after TBI [273]. A recent study found that inflammation induced by TBI in rodents was decreased by mGlu5 PAM treatment, whose signaling mechanism involved the Akt/GSK-3β/CREB pathway [274]. Although CREB can be activated by different signaling pathways, including ERK1/2, cAMP/PKA, and PI3K/Akt [275]. Reports from experimental and clinical studies have proven that Omega-3 polyunsaturated fatty acid [74], progesterone [75], resveratrol [76], apocynin [77], Ciprofloxacin and levofloxacin [276] play neuroprotective roles in TBI and improve outcomes following TBI by attenuating the TLR4/NF-κB signaling pathway [277].

Research has also shown that high mobility group box one (HMGB1) activates neuroinflammation through receptors such as Toll-like receptor (TLR2) and TLR4, as well as the receptor for advanced glycation end products (RAGE). This study shows that glycyrrhizin (GL) attenuates inflammatory responses, at least partly, by inhibiting HMGB1/TLR4/NF-κB signaling pathway in a rat model of TBI [278]. HMGB1 can bind directly to the TLR4/MD-2 complex to induce the release of proinflammatory cytokines in macrophages [279]. Recently, a study showed that stem cell-derived exosomes enter microglia/macrophages and suppress their activation during brain injury [78]. For example, human adipose mesenchymal stem cell-derived exosomes suppress the neuroinflammatory activation of macrophages and reduce neuronal apoptosis by inhibiting NFκB and P38 mitogen-activated protein kinase signaling in an LPS-induced inflammatory model [78]. Furthermore, in the TLR4 signaling pathway, Zhu et al. showed that curcumin treatment after LPS stimulation significantly decreased the release of inflammatory mediators such as IL-1β, IL-6, and RANTES, and suppressed the protein expressions of microglial TLR4/MyD88/NF-κB signaling pathway [280].

There are several therapeutic approaches that increase the proliferation, differentiation and survival of NSCs in the brain. For example transplantation of NPCs could improve neuronal differentiation and survival, synaptic plasticity, hippocampal neurogenesis, spatial memory, and immune modulation after TBI [281], which may be mediated through PI3K/AKT signaling pathway [282]. The hippocampus, as the most vulnerable area to brain injury, exhibits atrophy, deficits in long-term potentiation (LTP), protein expression, and alterations in hippocampal signaling which are correlated with memory deficit in TBI models and other neurodegenerative diseases [[283], [284], [285], [286]]. Interestingly, induction of LTP at the perforant pathway to the DG [17] could promote NPCs proliferation and the rate of neurogenesis due to strong depolarization and glutamate activation of many signaling pathways [287]. However, the main limitation of the therapeutic approach of stem cells in TBI is the poor viability and low differentiation of transplanted stem cells [288].

Bone marrow-derived mesenchymal stem cells/sodium alginate/collagen type I/stromal cell derived factor-1 (BMSCs/SA/Col/SDF-1) scaffold promotes the migration of BMSCs to the lesions and partly increases neurogenesis by activating the SDF-1/CXCR4-mediated FAK/PI3K/AKT and probably GSK3β/β-catenin pathway [288]. Microglia can also promote hippocampal proliferation and survival through the secretion of neurotrophic factors, communication with neighboring neurons, and removal of apoptotic newborn cells by ramified microglia [289].

In comparison with microglia, astrocytes exhibit a long-lasting proliferative response, lasting at least 28 days after TBI. Astrocytes produce the mitogenic protein S100β in vivo, which induces improvement in hippocampal neurogenesis, learning, and memory in rat models of TBI [290,291]. Astrocytes remarkably express factors such as neurotrophic factors and gliotransmitters, signal transducer and activator of transcription-3 (STAT3), and TLR, which support neuronal integrity and mediates anti-inflammatory responses [292]. Astrocytes also play a crucial role in neurogenesis, synaptogenesis, angiogenesis, BBB integrity, synaptic plasticity, anti-inflammatory reactions, axonal regeneration, and synaptic remodeling after TBI [291]. However, the molecular and cellular mechanisms related to the correlation between neurogenesis and TBI are not fully understood [3].

N -acetyl serotonin (NAS), as a tropomyosin related kinase receptor B (TrkB) agonist, exerts both antioxidant and anti-apoptotic activity through the TrkB/PI3K/Akt/CREB signaling pathway in NPCs. It increases hippocampal neurogenesis, expression of phosphorylated CREB in the DG region, and cognitive performance in a mouse model of CCI [19]. Activation of the Akt/GSK3beta/beta-catenin signaling pathway delays neuronal apoptosis, a major cause of post-traumatic mortality, which may be mediated by mitochondrial cytochrome c-induced caspase 3 release [293]. Some therapeutic compounds involved in mitochondrial regulation following TBI are also specified in Table 2.

Table 2.

Therapeutic compounds involved in the regulation of mitochondria following TBI.

Compound TBI models Pathways Properties Ref.
BAY 11-7082 CCI NLRP3 inhibitor Improved memory performance and brain tissue histology, reduced edema, BAX, IL-1b and Caspase-1 and increased Bcl-2 and BCL-XL protein expression [294]
Cyclosporin A TBI mPTP inhibitor Improving mitochondrial membrane potential.
Modulation of calcium homeostasis and oxidative damage.
Improve cognition and strengthen neuroprotection
[295]
GDF11 ICH phosphorylation of mitochondrial ETC Modulation of mitochondrial fission and fusion.
Attenuating mitochondrial dynamic abnormality and dysfunction
[296]
Olaparib CCI PARP inhibitor Improving mitochondrial function and preventing neuronal cell death.
Increasing mt-DNA repair
[297]
SS-31 TBI SIRT1 and PGC-1α Reversal of mitochondrial dysfunction.
Reduction of ROS content, malondialdehyde level and release of cytochrome c.
Preventing the reduction of superoxide dismutase activity.
[298]
MitoQ mild closed TBI Nrf2 Increased activity of antioxidant enzymes
Reducing the content of malondialdehyde (MDA)
Decreased transfer of Bax protein to mitochondria and release of cytochrome c into the cytosol
[299]
N-Acetylcysteine Amide spinal cord injuries Decreasing oxidative stress
Increasing mitochondrial bioenergetics normalizing GSH levels
[300]
AdipoRon TBI Adiponectin/AdiopR1, SIRT3, AMPK-PGC Mediating mitochondrial homeostasis and antioxidant system [301]
Mitoquinone TBI Nrf2/ARE
HO-1 and NQO-1
Increased expression of cytosolic Bax protein compared to the mitochondria
Increased expression of mitochondrial cyt c compared to cytosol
[302]
Resveratrol TBI ROS/GSK-3β Decreased GSK-3β activation and mitochondrial damage
Reduce glutamate-induced cytotoxicity
[303]
Polydatin TBI p-PERK, XBP-1, ATF6, SIRT1, p38 Reducing the release of reactive oxygen species in neuronal mitochondria
Reduction of mitochondrial swelling
Maintain mitochondrial membrane potential
Opening of mitochondrial permeability transition pore
[304]

Abbreviations: WT, wild type; CCI model, controlled cortical impact model; NLRP3, nucleotide binding oligomerization domain-like receptor family pyrin domain containing 3 or inflammasome.

In a study, the beneficial effects of electroacupuncture (EA) on hippocampal neurogenesis were demonstrated by the increase of double-labeled newborn neurons located in the SGZ of the DG in TBI model. These effects are probably exerted through the inhibition of both the TLR4/Myd88/NF-ĸB and TLR4/TRIF/NF-ĸB signaling pathways post-trauma [305]. However, it has been shown that TLR4 is expressed on the surface of NSCs, and stimulation of the TLR4 pathway suppresses the ameliorative effects of EA on hippocampal neurogenesis, neurocognitive, and neurobehavioral recovery after TBI [34,39].

As mentioned, post-TBI neuroinflammation negatively affects hippocampal NSCs and delays recovery. Moreover, the M1 microglia phenotype impairs hippocampal neurogenesis, while the M2 microglia phenotype improves hippocampal neurogenesis. In this regard, treatment with exosome-miR-124 after TBI promoted M2 polarization of microglia (inhibiting the TLR4 pathway), increased hippocampal neurogenesis (enhancing NSCs proliferation and differentiation), as well as improved neural function and cognition in behavioral tests [306]. Exosomes are small membrane-enclosed vesicles derived from certain pluripotent cell types such as MSCs [307], potentially ameliorating hippocampal neurogenesis and neuroinflammation relative to MSCs in TBI models [308].

The critical immune-modulatory receptor family, sphingosine 1- phosphate receptors (S1PRs), is highly expressed in hippocampal NSCs and SVZ, which might be responsible for biological changes in NSCs such as differentiation and migration toward the injured area. It is reported that S1PRs are essential for hippocampal NSCs differentiation through MEK/Erk phosphorylation after post-traumatic conditions [39]. A variety of proteins, such as vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF), BDNF, CREB, and Na + -K + -2Cl− co-transporter type 1 (NKCC1), have been demonstrated to be involved in post-TBI neurogenesis [309]. Promotion of hippocampal neurogenesis and survival of neonatal neurons by overexpression of suppressor of cytokine signaling 2 (SOCS2) may be mediated through BDNF and its receptor TrkB, which is associated with the increased anti-inflammatory phenotype of M2 macrophages after TBI [2].

Two pathways are involved in the neurogenic effect of VEGF in the hippocampus, as a hypoxia-induced neurotrophic and angiogenic factor after TBI: the PI3K–Akt pathway that promotes cell survival through anti-apoptic, proangiogenic, and neuroprotective activity, and the Raf/MEK/ERK pathway through DNA synthesis and cell growth. VEGF, especially through VEGF receptor-2 and VEGFR-3 receptors, mediates axonal elongation, cell proliferation and chemotaxis in glial precursor cells [3,310]. NKCC1, which is highly expressed in neurons and astrocytes has been documented that regulate neuronal volume, ion homeostasis, cell proliferation, and neuroblast migration. In this way, upregulation of NKCC1 is correlated with the activation of Raf/MEK/ERK cascade, upregulation of HIF-1α and VEGF, and adult hippocampal neurogenesis [309].

The Wnt/β-catenin signaling pathway, through the proliferation and differentiation of NPCs in both SVZ and SGZ, is important for the recovery of neural injuries such as TBI model. Surviving, the downstream target gene of the Wnt/β-catenin pathway, induces neurogenesis in immature and mature neurons in the DG region of the hippocampus in a time-dependent manner after the induction of TBI [[311], [312], [313]]. The Raf/MEK/ERK and Wnt/β-catenin pathways have been reported to be involved in differentiation and proliferation [314]. Traumatic spinal cord injury (SCI) or neurotrauma is associated with varying degrees of axonal demyelination, permanent sensorimotor loss, and altered conductivity of ion channels [315]. In this regard, regeneration process after SCI requires activation of the Wnt/β-catenin signaling pathway to act directly on radial glia and induce their differentiation into adult neurons [316,317].

The Notch signaling pathway is a developmental process that participates in various key processes such as survival, differentiation, proliferation, function, and homeostasis [318]. Moreover, Notch signaling is involved in the M1/M2 imbalance in RA [319]. Notch signaling involves in neurogenesis through the induction of quiescent NSCs' entrance to the cell cycle, increasing the number of NSCs, self-renewal, and synaptic plasticity through the hairy and enhancer of split 1(Hes1)-Notch-1 and NF-κ B/p65 signaling pathways (in activated microglia), and the Notch-PI3K-AKT pathway (in activated astrocytes) [[320], [321], [322], [323]]. Overexpression of Hes1 following the injection of an adenoviral vector carrying Hes1 cDNA impairs adult hippocampal neurogenesis and learning capacity through the suppression of the notch signaling pathway in the DG of the hippocampus after TBI model [324].

Other experiments showed that STAT1 or STAT3 could regulate the maintenance of NSCs in the hippocampus of SCI model which may be correlated with the JNK signaling and NF-κB/p65 pathway [325,326], or astrocyte secretory polypeptides via the JAK-STAT pathway [327]. HMGB1, as a non-histone DNA binding protein involved in DNA repair, also regulates both neuroinflammatory cascades in microglia through interaction with HMGB1-TLR4-NF-κ B in microglia and astrocyte, as well as neurogenesis via the HMGB1-RAGE–NF–κ B axis following TBI [328,329]. Inhibition of the TLR4/NF-κB/NLRP3 inflammatory signaling pathway is also associated with neurogenesis and angiogenesis in other neurodegenerative diseases [330]. N-formylpeptide receptor 1 (Fpr1) also promotes survival and neural differentiation in the DG region and decreases acute inflammation through the MAPk- NF-κ B - NLRP3 after TBI [331]. In addition, the compounds involved in the regulation of hippocampal neurogenesis following TBI are specified in Table 3.

Table 3.

Strategies involved in regulation of hippocampal neurogenesis following TBI.

Molecules TBI models Pathways Properties Ref.
NPC transplantation Lateral fluid percussion Neurotrophin (MNTS1))–Trk Up regulation of endogenous hippocampal neurogenesis, immune modulatation [281]
N-acetyl serotonin (NAS) CCI model TrkB/PI3K/Akt/(CREB) Increase of hippocampal neurogenesis, CREB phosphorylation, [19]
Phosphorylation assessment CCI model Akt/GSK- 3beta/beta-catenin Increase of Neuronal survival and decrease apoptosis [293]
Electroacupuncture CCI model inhibition of both TLR4/Myd88/NF-ĸB- & TLR4/TRIF/NF-ĸB enhancement of double labeled newborn neurons in the SGZ [34,332]
Curcumin CCI model BDNF/Trkb/PI3K/Akt pathway Enhanced hippocampal DG neurogenesis and decreased hippocampal neuroinflammation [37]
miR-124enriched exosomes CCI model TLR4 pathway Enhance M2 polarization of Microglia and Hippocampus neurogenesis (NSCs differentiation and proliferation) [306]
S1PRs CCI model MEK/Erk pathway increase proliferation of NSCs in hippocampus [39]
VEGF CCI model PI3K –Akt,
Raf/MEK/ERK pathways
promotes cell survival [310]
simvastatin CCI model PI3K/AKT/GSK-3β/CREB pathway increase proliferation of NSCs in hippocampus [333]
NKCC1 CCI model Raf/MEK/ERK regulate ion homeostasis, cell proliferation and neuroblast migration [309]
Survivin lateral fluid
percussion
Wnt/β-catenin pathway Promotion of neurogenesis [312]
Hes1 lateral fluid percussion Notch signaling Decrease neurogenesis of NPCs [324]
Fpr1 CCI model MAPk–NF–κ B-NLRP3 pathway Promote neurogenesis [331]

Abbreviations: NPC, neural progenitor cell; MNTS1, human multineurotrophin; CCI model, controlled cortical impact model; PI3K, Phosphoinositide 3-kinase; AKT, Akt kinase; CREB, cAMP response element-binding protein; GSK, GlaxoSmithKline; TLR4, Toll-like receptor 4; TRIF, TIR-domain-containing adapter-inducing interferon-β; S1PRs, sphingosine-1-phosphate receptors; VEGF, Vascular endothelial growth factor; NKCC1, Na–K–Cl cotransporter; Hes1, Hes Family BHLH Transcription Factor 1; Fpr1, Formyl Peptide Receptor 1; NLRP3, NOD-, LRR- and pyrin domain-containing protein 3.

7. Discussion

The findings of this study clarify the intricate interplay between microglia-induced neuroinflammation and hippocampal neurogenesis following TBI. Microglia, the resident immune cells of CNS, play a pivotal role in the inflammatory response and can exert both neuroprotective and neurotoxic effect, depending on their phenotypic polarization [334].

One of the key mechanisms highlighted in this study is the involvement of various signaling pathways in regulating microglial activation and neuroinflammation. The JAK/STAT/SOCS pathway, known for its role in anti-inflammatory responses, emerges as a crucial regulator for microglial function [335]. SOCS proteins, such as SOCS1 and SOCS2, act as negative regulators of this pathway, influencing macrophage polarization and function. Modulating the expression or activity of these proteins could potentially shift the balance towards more neuroprotective microglial phenotype [336].

The study also emphasizes the importance of the PI3K/Akt/mTOR signaling pathway in mediating anti-apoptotic and anti-autophagy responses following TBI. Several neuroprotective factors, such as dexmedetomidine, tetrahydrocurcumin, and simvastatin, have been shown to exert their beneficial effects through the activation of this pathway [337]. However, it is crucial to strike a balance, as excessive activation of this pathway may lead to undesirable consequences. Another key pathway implicated in microglial pro-inflammatory responses is the Ras-Raf-ERK MAPK pathway. Modulating the activity of this pathway could potentially attenuate the detrimental effects of neuroinflammation on hippocampal neurogenesis [338].

Interestingly, the study highlights the role of mitochondrial dysfunction in the activation of the NLRP3 inflammasome, a key mediator of the inflammatory response. Mitochondrial dysfunction can lead to the release of mtDNA, ROS, and cardiolipin, which can activate the NLRP3 inflammasome, triggering the release of pro-inflammatory cytokines such as IL-1β and IL-18 [339,340]. Targeting this pathway could represent a promising therapeutic strategy for mitigating neuroinflammation and promoting neuronal repair. Furthermore, the study highlight the complex interplay between microglia and hippocampal neurogenesis. While pathologically activated microglia can inhibit neurogenesis through various mechanisms, such as impaired phagocytosis, dysregulated synaptic maintenance, and secretion of inflammatory factors [42]. The study also suggests that a moderate reducing in microglial activation may not be sufficient to support neurogenesis. This underscores the need for a balanced approach in modulating microglial activity to promote neuronal repair and regeneration.

It is important to note that the M1/M2 paradigm of microglial polarization is an oversimplification, and there exists a spectrum of intermediate phenotypes. Future research should aim to characterize these intermediate states and their specific roles in neuroinflammation and neurogenesis.

8. Conclusion

Microglia are associated with hippocampal structural and physiological changes and cognitive impairment after TBI. Depending on their phenotypic polarization (M1 or M2), they can either enhance neuroprotective and neurogenesis processes or inhibit neuronal repair and exacerbate cell damage. Activation of microglia following TBI occurs through several molecular pathways, including mitochondrial dysfunction. Therefore, factors that inhibit the signaling pathways of microglial activation, including the improvement of mitochondrial dysfunction, can be a suitable treatment strategy for hippocampal disorders caused by TBI.

Data availability

The authors confirm that the data supporting the findings of this study are available within the article.

CRediT authorship contribution statement

Seyedeh Parisa Navabi: Investigation, Data curation. Firuzeh Badreh: Writing – original draft, Validation. Maryam Khombi Shooshtari: Writing – original draft, Investigation. Somayeh Hajipour: Writing – review & editing. Sadegh Moradi Vastegani: Writing – review & editing, Writing – original draft, Supervision, Project administration. Seyed Esmaeil Khoshnam: Writing – original draft, Visualization, Validation.

Declaration of competing interest

The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.

Contributor Information

Sadegh Moradi Vastegani, Email: smv6020@yahoo.com, moradi.sadegh@ajums.ac.ir.

Seyed Esmaeil Khoshnam, Email: Esmaeil.khoshnam1392@gmail.com.

References

  • 1.Fischer T.D., et al. Altered mitochondrial dynamics and TBI pathophysiology. Front. Syst. Neurosci. 2016;10:29. doi: 10.3389/fnsys.2016.00029. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Basrai H.S., et al. Suppressor of cytokine signaling-2 (SOCS2) regulates the microglial response and improves functional outcome after traumatic brain injury in mice. 2016;11(4) doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0153418. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Lu K.-T., et al. Hippocampal neurogenesis after traumatic brain injury is mediated by vascular endothelial growth factor receptor-2 and the Raf/MEK/ERK cascade. 2011;28(3):441–450. doi: 10.1089/neu.2010.1473. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Sauerbeck A., et al. Pioglitazone attenuates mitochondrial dysfunction, cognitive impairment, cortical tissue loss, and inflammation following traumatic brain injury. Exp. Neurol. 2011;227(1):128–135. doi: 10.1016/j.expneurol.2010.10.003. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Redell J.B., et al. Traumatic brain injury and hippocampal neurogenesis: functional implications. Exp. Neurol. 2020;331 doi: 10.1016/j.expneurol.2020.113372. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Moon H.Y. Differential expression of genes in the subgranular zone and granular cell layer of the hippocampus after running. J Exerc Nutrition Biochem. 2018;22(4):1–6. doi: 10.20463/jenb.2018.0025. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Kempermann G., Song H., Gage F.H. Neurogenesis in the adult Hippocampus. Cold Spring Harbor Perspect. Biol. 2015;7(9):a018812. doi: 10.1101/cshperspect.a018812. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Ninkovic J., Mori T., Götz M. Distinct modes of neuron addition in adult mouse neurogenesis. J. Neurosci. 2007;27(40):10906–10911. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2572-07.2007. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Anderson K.J., et al. Regional distribution of fluoro-jade B staining in the hippocampus following traumatic brain injury. Exp. Neurol. 2005;193(1):125–130. doi: 10.1016/j.expneurol.2004.11.025. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Wang X., et al. Traumatic brain injury severity affects neurogenesis in adult mouse hippocampus. J. Neurotrauma. 2016;33(8):721–733. doi: 10.1089/neu.2015.4097. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Corrigan F., et al. Neurogenic inflammation after traumatic brain injury and its potentiation of classical inflammation. J. Neuroinflammation. 2016;13(1):264. doi: 10.1186/s12974-016-0738-9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Xu L., He D., Bai Y. Microglia-mediated inflammation and neurodegenerative disease. Mol. Neurobiol. 2016;53(10):6709–6715. doi: 10.1007/s12035-015-9593-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Cuadros M.A., et al. Microglia and microglia-like cells: similar but different. Front. Cell. Neurosci. 2022;16 doi: 10.3389/fncel.2022.816439. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Carniglia L., et al. Neuropeptides and microglial activation in inflammation, pain, and neurodegenerative diseases. Mediat. Inflamm. 2017;2017(1) doi: 10.1155/2017/5048616. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Voloboueva L.A., Giffard R.G. Inflammation, mitochondria, and the inhibition of adult neurogenesis. J. Neurosci. Res. 2011;89(12):1989–1996. doi: 10.1002/jnr.22768. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Whitney N.P., et al. Inflammation mediates varying effects in neurogenesis: relevance to the pathogenesis of brain injury and neurodegenerative disorders. J. Neurochem. 2009;108(6):1343–1359. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-4159.2009.05886.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Sahel D.K., et al. Mitochondrial dysfunctioning and neuroinflammation: recent highlights on the possible mechanisms involved in Traumatic Brain Injury. Neurosci. Lett. 2019;710 doi: 10.1016/j.neulet.2019.134347. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Umschweif G., et al. Neuroprotection after traumatic brain injury in heat-acclimated mice involves induced neurogenesis and activation of angiotensin receptor type 2 signaling. J. Cerebr. Blood Flow Metabol. 2014;34(8):1381–1390. doi: 10.1038/jcbfm.2014.93. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Li Q., et al. N-acetyl serotonin protects neural progenitor cells against oxidative stress-induced apoptosis and improves neurogenesis in adult mouse hippocampus following traumatic brain injury. J. Mol. Neurosci. 2019;67(4):574–588. doi: 10.1007/s12031-019-01263-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Alam A., et al. Cellular infiltration in traumatic brain injury. J. Neuroinflammation. 2020;17(1):328. doi: 10.1186/s12974-020-02005-x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Ng S.Y., Lee A.Y.W. Traumatic brain injuries: pathophysiology and potential therapeutic targets. Front. Cell. Neurosci. 2019;13:528. doi: 10.3389/fncel.2019.00528. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Skandsen T., et al. Prevalence and impact of diffuse axonal injury in patients with moderate and severe head injury: a cohort study of early magnetic resonance imaging findings and 1-year outcome. J. Neurosurg. 2010;113(3):556–563. doi: 10.3171/2009.9.JNS09626. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Rabinowitz A.R., Levin H.S. Cognitive sequelae of traumatic brain injury. Psychiatr. Clin. 2014;37(1):1–11. doi: 10.1016/j.psc.2013.11.004. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Wu A.-G., et al. Targeting Nrf2-mediated oxidative stress response in traumatic brain injury: therapeutic perspectives of phytochemicals. Oxid. Med. Cell. Longev. 2022;102(25) doi: 10.1155/2022/1015791. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Sivandzade F., Alqahtani F., Cucullo L. Traumatic brain injury and blood-brain barrier (BBB): underlying pathophysiological mechanisms and the influence of cigarette smoking as a premorbid condition. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2020;21(8):2721. doi: 10.3390/ijms21082721. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Stojanovic I.R., Kostic M., Ljubisavljevic S. The role of glutamate and its receptors in multiple sclerosis. J. Neural. Transm. 2014;121(8):945–955. doi: 10.1007/s00702-014-1188-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Cai J., Yang J., Jones D. Mitochondrial control of apoptosis: the role of cytochrome c. Biochim. Biophys. Acta Bioenerg. 1998;1366(1):139–149. doi: 10.1016/s0005-2728(98)00109-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Moradi Vastegani S., et al. Mitochondrial dysfunction and Parkinson's disease: pathogenesis and therapeutic strategies. Neurochem. Res. 2023;48(8):2285–2308. doi: 10.1007/s11064-023-03904-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Corser-Jensen C.E. University of Colorado Denver, Anschutz Medical Campus; ProQuest: 2015. Targeting Leukotriene-Mediated Neuroinflammation in Traumatic Brain Injury. Dissertations & Theses. [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Jarrahi A., et al. Revisiting traumatic brain injury: from molecular mechanisms to therapeutic interventions. Biomedicines. 2020;8(10):389. doi: 10.3390/biomedicines8100389. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Bolzan J.A., de Oliveira C.L. Protocol for systematic review and meta-analysis of the evidence linking hippocampal neurogenesis to the effects of antidepressants on mood and behaviour. BMJ Open Science. 2021;5(1) doi: 10.1136/bmjos-2020-100077. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Ng S.Y., et al. Attenuation of microglial activation with minocycline is not associated with changes in neurogenesis after focal traumatic brain injury in adult mice. J. Neurotrauma. 2012;29(7):1410–1425. doi: 10.1089/neu.2011.2188. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Redell J.B., et al. Traumatic brain injury and hippocampal neurogenesis: functional implications. 2020;331 doi: 10.1016/j.expneurol.2020.113372. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Ye Y., et al. Association between toll-like receptor 4 expression and neural stem cell proliferation in the hippocampus following traumatic brain injury in mice. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2014;15(7):12651–12664. doi: 10.3390/ijms150712651. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Wang H., et al. Inhibition of elevated hippocampal CD24 reduces neurogenesis in mice with traumatic brain injury. J. Surg. Res. 2020;245:321–329. doi: 10.1016/j.jss.2019.07.082. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Wang X., et al. Traumatic brain injury severity affects neurogenesis in adult mouse hippocampus. J. Neurotrauma. 2016;33(8):721–733. doi: 10.1089/neu.2015.4097. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Sun G., et al. Curcumin alleviates neuroinflammation, enhances hippocampal neurogenesis, and improves spatial memory after traumatic brain injury. Brain Res. Bull. 2020;162:84–93. doi: 10.1016/j.brainresbull.2020.05.009. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Zheng W., et al. Neurogenesis in adult human brain after traumatic brain injury. J. Neurotrauma. 2013;30(22):1872–1880. doi: 10.1089/neu.2010.1579. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Ye Y., et al. Activation of sphingosine 1-phosphate receptor 1 enhances hippocampus neurogenesis in a rat model of traumatic brain injury: an involvement of MEK/Erk signaling pathway. Neural Plast. 2016;2016(1) doi: 10.1155/2016/8072156. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Gemma C., Bachstetter A.D. The role of microglia in adult hippocampal neurogenesis. Front. Cell. Neurosci. 2013;7:229. doi: 10.3389/fncel.2013.00229. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Tahmasebi F., Barati S. The role of microglial depletion approaches in pathological condition of CNS. Cell. Mol. Neurobiol. 2023;43(6):2459–2471. doi: 10.1007/s10571-023-01326-8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Al-Onaizi M., et al. Role of microglia in modulating adult neurogenesis in health and neurodegeneration. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2020;21(18):6875. doi: 10.3390/ijms21186875. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Arcuri C., et al. The pathophysiological role of microglia in dynamic surveillance, phagocytosis and structural remodeling of the developing CNS. Front. Mol. Neurosci. 2017;10:191. doi: 10.3389/fnmol.2017.00191. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Aparicio I.D. Universidad del País Vasco/Euskal Herriko Unibertsitatea; 2018. Microglial Phagocytosis of Apoptotic Cells Triggers a Neuromodulatory Program that Supports Neurogenesis. [Google Scholar]
  • 45.De Lucia C., et al. Microglia regulate hippocampal neurogenesis during chronic neurodegeneration. Brain Behav. Immun. 2016;55:179–190. doi: 10.1016/j.bbi.2015.11.001. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Pérez-Rodríguez D.R., Blanco-Luquin I., Mendioroz M. The participation of microglia in neurogenesis: a review. Brain Sci. 2021;11(5):658. doi: 10.3390/brainsci11050658. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Gemma C., Bachstetter A.D. The role of microglia in adult hippocampal neurogenesis. Front. Cell. Neurosci. 2013;7:229. doi: 10.3389/fncel.2013.00229. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Wu N., et al. Neuroblasts migration under control of reactive astrocyte-derived BDNF: a promising therapy in late neurogenesis after traumatic brain injury. Stem Cell Res. Ther. 2023;14(1):2. doi: 10.1186/s13287-022-03232-0. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49.Tessier M., et al. Bumetanide induces post-traumatic microglia–interneuron contact to promote neurogenesis and recovery. Brain. 2023;146(10):4247–4261. doi: 10.1093/brain/awad132. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 50.Sánchez Zafra V. 2019. Microglial Phagocytosis: Unraveling the Role of GPR34-LYSOPS Signaling and Phagocytic Microglia on Metabolism and Neurogenesis. [Google Scholar]
  • 51.Liu Y., et al. CX3CL1/CX3CR1-mediated microglia activation plays a detrimental role in ischemic mice brain via p38MAPK/PKC pathway. J. Cerebr. Blood Flow Metabol. 2015;35(10):1623–1631. doi: 10.1038/jcbfm.2015.97. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 52.Yang Y., et al. MiR-124 enriched exosomes promoted the M2 polarization of microglia and enhanced hippocampus neurogenesis after traumatic brain injury by inhibiting TLR4 pathway. Neurochem. Res. 2019;44:811–828. doi: 10.1007/s11064-018-02714-z. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 53.Dugo L., et al. Effect of cocoa polyphenolic extract on macrophage polarization from proinflammatory M1 to anti-inflammatory M2 state. Oxid. Med. Cell. Longev. 2017. 2017 doi: 10.1155/2017/6293740. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 54.Stratoulias V., et al. Microglial subtypes: diversity within the microglial community. EMBO J. 2019;38(17) doi: 10.15252/embj.2019101997. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 55.Wang J., He W., Zhang J. A richer and more diverse future for microglia phenotypes. Heliyon. 2023;9(4) doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e14713. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 56.Orihuela R., McPherson C.A., Harry G.J. Microglial M1/M2 polarization and metabolic states. Br. J. Pharmacol. 2016;173(4):649–665. doi: 10.1111/bph.13139. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 57.Wang W.Y., et al. Role of pro-inflammatory cytokines released from microglia in Alzheimer's disease. Ann. Transl. Med. 2015;3(10):136. doi: 10.3978/j.issn.2305-5839.2015.03.49. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 58.Yang Y., et al. MiR-124 enriched exosomes promoted the M2 polarization of microglia and enhanced hippocampus neurogenesis after traumatic brain injury by inhibiting TLR4 pathway. Neurochem. Res. 2019;44(4):811–828. doi: 10.1007/s11064-018-02714-z. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 59.Guo S., Wang H., Yin Y. Microglia polarization from M1 to M2 in neurodegenerative diseases. Front. Aging Neurosci. 2022;14 doi: 10.3389/fnagi.2022.815347. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 60.Guo S., Wang H., Yin Y. Microglia polarization from M1 to M2 in neurodegenerative diseases. Front. Aging Neurosci. 2022;14 doi: 10.3389/fnagi.2022.815347. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 61.Wang J., He W., Zhang J. A richer and more diverse future for microglia phenotypes. Heliyon. 2023;9(4) doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e14713. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 62.Popiolek-Barczyk K., Mika J. Targeting the microglial signaling pathways: new insights in the modulation of neuropathic pain. Curr. Med. Chem. 2016;23(26):2908–2928. doi: 10.2174/0929867323666160607120124. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 63.Li J., et al. Microglial phenotypic transition: signaling pathways and influencing modulators involved in regulation in central nervous system diseases. Front. Cell. Neurosci. 2021;15 doi: 10.3389/fncel.2021.736310. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 64.Wu H., et al. Mer regulates microglial/macrophage M1/M2 polarization and alleviates neuroinflammation following traumatic brain injury. J. Neuroinflammation. 2021;18(1):1–20. doi: 10.1186/s12974-020-02041-7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 65.Zhao J.-b., et al. Activation of JAK2/STAT pathway in cerebral cortex after experimental traumatic brain injury of rats. Neurosci. Lett. 2011;498(2):147–152. doi: 10.1016/j.neulet.2011.05.001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 66.Liu B., et al. Inhibition of RNF6 alleviates traumatic brain injury by suppressing STAT3 signaling in rats. Brain and Behavior. 2020;10(12) doi: 10.1002/brb3.1847. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 67.He H., et al. Sevoflurane post-conditioning attenuates traumatic brain injury-induced neuronal apoptosis by promoting autophagy via the PI3K/AKT signaling pathway. Drug Des. Dev. Ther. 2018;12:629. doi: 10.2147/DDDT.S158313. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 68.Zhang M.-H., et al. PI3K/Akt/mTOR pathway participates in neuroprotection by dexmedetomidine inhibits neuronic autophagy following traumatic brain injury in rats. Int J Res Med Sci. 2014;2:1569–1575. [Google Scholar]
  • 69.Gao Y., et al. Tetrahydrocurcumin provides neuroprotection in rats after traumatic brain injury: autophagy and the PI3K/AKT pathways as a potential mechanism. J. Surg. Res. 2016;206(1):67–76. doi: 10.1016/j.jss.2016.07.014. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 70.Wu H., et al. Simvastatin-mediated upregulation of VEGF and BDNF, activation of the PI3K/Akt pathway, and increase of neurogenesis are associated with therapeutic improvement after traumatic brain injury. J. Neurotrauma. 2008;25(2):130–139. doi: 10.1089/neu.2007.0369. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 71.Zhang L., et al. Traumatic brain injury-induced neuronal apoptosis is reduced through modulation of PI3K and autophagy pathways in mouse by FTY720. Cell. Mol. Neurobiol. 2016;36(1):131–142. doi: 10.1007/s10571-015-0227-1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 72.Chen S.-F., et al. Salidroside improves behavioral and histological outcomes and reduces apoptosis via PI3K/Akt signaling after experimental traumatic brain injury. PLoS One. 2012;7(9) doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0045763. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 73.Bao Y.-J., et al. 17Beta-estradiol differentially protects cortical pericontusional zone from programmed cell death after traumatic cerebral contusion at distinct stages via non-genomic and genomic pathways. Mol. Cell. Neurosci. 2011;48(3):185–194. doi: 10.1016/j.mcn.2011.07.004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 74.Chen X., et al. Omega-3 polyunsaturated fatty acid supplementation attenuates microglial-induced inflammation by inhibiting the HMGB1/TLR4/NF-κB pathway following experimental traumatic brain injury. J. Neuroinflammation. 2017;14(1):1–12. doi: 10.1186/s12974-017-0917-3. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 75.Chen G., et al. Progesterone prevents traumatic brain injury-induced intestinal nuclear factor kappa B activation and proinflammatory cytokines expression in male rats. Mediat. Inflamm. 2007;2007 doi: 10.1155/2007/93431. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 76.Feng Y., et al. Resveratrol attenuates neuronal autophagy and inflammatory injury by inhibiting the TLR4/NF-κB signaling pathway in experimental traumatic brain injury. Int. J. Mol. Med. 2016;37(4):921–930. doi: 10.3892/ijmm.2016.2495. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 77.Feng Y., et al. Protective role of apocynin via suppression of neuronal autophagy and TLR4/NF-κB signaling pathway in a rat model of traumatic brain injury. Neurochem. Res. 2017;42(11):3296–3309. doi: 10.1007/s11064-017-2372-z. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 78.Chen Y., et al. MSC-derived exosomes promote recovery from traumatic brain injury via microglia/macrophages in rat. Aging (Albany NY) 2020;12(18) doi: 10.18632/aging.103692. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 79.Kaley T., et al. BRAF inhibition in BRAFV600-mutant gliomas: results from the VE-BASKET study. J. Clin. Oncol. 2018;36(35):3477. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2018.78.9990. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 80.Burotto M., et al. The MAPK pathway across different malignancies: a new perspective. Cancer. 2014;120(22):3446–3456. doi: 10.1002/cncr.28864. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 81.Shen M., et al. Dexmedetomidine exerts neuroprotective effect via the activation of the PI3K/Akt/mTOR signaling pathway in rats with traumatic brain injury. Biomed. Pharmacother. 2017;95:885–893. doi: 10.1016/j.biopha.2023.115945. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 82.Cuyàs E., et al. Cell cycle regulation by the nutrient-sensing mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR) pathway. Cell Cycle Control. 2014:113–144. doi: 10.1007/978-1-4939-0888-2_7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 83.Long X., et al. Rheb binds and regulates the mTOR kinase. Curr. Biol. 2005;15(8):702–713. doi: 10.1016/j.cub.2005.02.053. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 84.Yadav A., et al. JAK/STAT3 pathway is involved in survival of neurons in response to insulin-like growth factor and negatively regulated by suppressor of cytokine signaling-3. J. Biol. Chem. 2005;280(36):31830–31840. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M501316200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 85.Murray P.J. The JAK-STAT signaling pathway: input and output integration. J. Immunol. 2007;178(5):2623–2629. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.178.5.2623. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 86.Yoshimura A., Naka T., Kubo M. SOCS proteins, cytokine signalling and immune regulation. Nat. Rev. Immunol. 2007;7(6):454–465. doi: 10.1038/nri2093. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 87.Yoshimura A., et al. SOCS, inflammation, and autoimmunity. Front. Immunol. 2012;3:20. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2012.00020. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 88.Tang H., et al. Soluble egg antigen activates M2 macrophages via the STAT6 and PI3K pathways, and Schistosoma japonicum alternatively activates macrophage polarization to improve the survival rate of septic mice. J. Cell. Biochem. 2017;118(12):4230–4239. doi: 10.1002/jcb.26073. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 89.Zhou D., et al. SOCS molecules: the growing players in macrophage polarization and function. Oncotarget. 2017;8(36):60710–60722. doi: 10.18632/oncotarget.19940. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 90.Jiang M., et al. Dysregulation of SOCS-mediated negative feedback of cytokine signaling in carcinogenesis and its significance in cancer treatment. Front. Immunol. 2017;8:70. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2017.00070. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 91.Mense K., et al. The somatotropic axis during the physiological estrus cycle in dairy heifers—effect on hepatic expression of GHR and SOCS2. J. Dairy Sci. 2015;98(4):2409–2418. doi: 10.3168/jds.2014-8734. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 92.Basrai H.S., et al. Suppressor of cytokine signaling-2 (SOCS2) regulates the microglial response and improves functional outcome after traumatic brain injury in mice. PLoS One. 2016;11(4) doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0153418. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 93.Spence S., et al. Suppressors of cytokine signaling 2 and 3 diametrically control macrophage polarization. Immunity. 2013;38(1):66–78. doi: 10.1016/j.immuni.2012.09.013. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 94.Zhao J., et al. Protective effect of suppressing STAT3 activity in LPS-induced acute lung injury. Am. J. Physiol. Lung Cell Mol. Physiol. 2016;311(5):L868–L880. doi: 10.1152/ajplung.00281.2016. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 95.Sun K.-Y., et al. Lactobacillus paracasei modulates LPS-induced inflammatory cytokine release by monocyte-macrophages via the up-regulation of negative regulators of NF-kappaB signaling in a TLR2-dependent manner. Cytokine. 2017;92:1–11. doi: 10.1016/j.cyto.2017.01.003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 96.Yu T., et al. SENP1 regulates IFN-γ− STAT1 signaling through STAT3− SOCS3 negative feedback loop. J. Mol. Cell Biol. 2017;9(2):144–153. doi: 10.1093/jmcb/mjw042. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 97.Bilanges B., Posor Y., Vanhaesebroeck B. PI3K isoforms in cell signalling and vesicle trafficking. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 2019;20(9):515–534. doi: 10.1038/s41580-019-0129-z. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 98.Jafari M., et al. PI3k/AKT signaling pathway: erythropoiesis and beyond. J. Cell. Physiol. 2019;234(3):2373–2385. doi: 10.1002/jcp.27262. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 99.Zhang M., Zhang X. The role of PI3K/AKT/FOXO signaling in psoriasis. Arch. Dermatol. Res. 2019;311:83–91. doi: 10.1007/s00403-018-1879-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 100.Szymonowicz K., et al. New insights into protein kinase B/Akt signaling: role of localized Akt activation and compartment-specific target proteins for the cellular radiation response. Cancers. 2018;10(3):78. doi: 10.3390/cancers10030078. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 101.Huang X., et al. The PI3K/AKT pathway in obesity and type 2 diabetes. Int. J. Biol. Sci. 2018;14(11):1483–1496. doi: 10.7150/ijbs.27173. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 102.Revathidevi S., Munirajan A.K. Akt in cancer: mediator and more. Semin. Cancer Biol. 2019;59:80–91. doi: 10.1016/j.semcancer.2019.06.002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 103.Linton M.F., Moslehi J.J., Babaev V.R. Akt signaling in macrophage polarization, survival, and atherosclerosis. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2019;20(11):2703. doi: 10.3390/ijms20112703. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 104.Jhanwar-Uniyal M., et al. Diverse signaling mechanisms of mTOR complexes: mTORC1 and mTORC2 in forming a formidable relationship. Adv Biol Regul. 2019;72:51–62. doi: 10.1016/j.jbior.2019.03.003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 105.Guertin D.A., Sabatini D.M. Defining the role of mTOR in cancer. Cancer Cell. 2007;12(1):9–22. doi: 10.1016/j.ccr.2007.05.008. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 106.Dong H., et al. Lithium ameliorates lipopolysaccharide-induced microglial activation via inhibition of toll-like receptor 4 expression by activating the PI3K/Akt/FoxO1 pathway. J. Neuroinflammation. 2014;11(1):1–11. doi: 10.1186/s12974-014-0140-4. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 107.Saponaro C., et al. The PI3K/Akt pathway is required for LPS activation of microglial cells. Immunopharmacol. Immunotoxicol. 2012;34(5):858–865. doi: 10.3109/08923973.2012.665461. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 108.Cianciulli A., et al. Microglia mediated neuroinflammation: focus on PI3K modulation. Biomolecules. 2020;10(1):137. doi: 10.3390/biom10010137. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 109.Cantley L.C. The phosphoinositide 3-kinase pathway. Science. 2002;296(5573):1655–1657. doi: 10.1126/science.296.5573.1655. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 110.Sun N., et al. Ghrelin attenuates brain injury in septic mice via PI3K/Akt signaling activation. Brain Res. Bull. 2016;124:278–285. doi: 10.1016/j.brainresbull.2016.06.002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 111.Beurel E., Grieco S.F., Jope R.S. Glycogen synthase kinase-3 (GSK3): regulation, actions, and diseases. Pharmacol. Therapeut. 2015;148:114–131. doi: 10.1016/j.pharmthera.2014.11.016. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 112.Atkins R.J., et al. Regulation of glycogen synthase kinase-3 beta (GSK-3β) by the Akt pathway in gliomas. J. Clin. Neurosci. 2012;19(11):1558–1563. doi: 10.1016/j.jocn.2012.07.002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 113.Eldar-Finkelman H., Martinez A. GSK-3 inhibitors: preclinical and clinical focus on CNS. Front. Mol. Neurosci. 2011;4:32. doi: 10.3389/fnmol.2011.00032. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 114.Maixner D.W., Weng H.-R. The role of glycogen synthase kinase 3 beta in neuroinflammation and pain. J. Pharm. Pharmacol. 2013;1(1):1. doi: 10.13188/2327-204X.1000001. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 115.Qiao X., et al. PI3K-AKT-GSK3β-CREB signaling pathway regulates anxiety-like behavior in rats following alcohol withdrawal. J. Affect. Disord. 2018;235:96–104. doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2018.04.039. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 116.Alexaki V., et al. DHEA inhibits acute microglia-mediated inflammation through activation of the TrkA-Akt1/2-CREB-Jmjd3 pathway. Mol. Psychiatr. 2018;23(6):1410–1420. doi: 10.1038/mp.2017.167. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 117.Ye Y., et al. Electroacupuncture improved hippocampal neurogenesis following traumatic brain injury in mice through inhibition of TLR4 signaling pathway. Stem Cell. Int. 2017;2017 doi: 10.1155/2017/5841814. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 118.Liu G., et al. FK506 attenuates the inflammation in rat spinal cord injury by inhibiting the activation of NF-κB in microglia cells. Cell. Mol. Neurobiol. 2017;37(5):843–855. doi: 10.1007/s10571-016-0422-8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 119.Lu Y.-C., Yeh W.-C., Ohashi P.S. LPS/TLR4 signal transduction pathway. Cytokine. 2008;42(2):145–151. doi: 10.1016/j.cyto.2008.01.006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 120.Neurath M.F., et al. Local administration of antisense phosphorothiate olignucleotides to the p65 subunit of NF–κB abrogates established experimental colitis in mice. Nat. Med. 1996;2(9):998–1004. doi: 10.1038/nm0996-998. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 121.Wang Z., et al. Progesterone administration modulates cortical TLR4/NF-κB signaling pathway after subarachnoid hemorrhage in male rats. Mediat. Inflamm. 2011;2011 doi: 10.1155/2011/848309. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 122.Han K.-J., et al. Mechanisms of the TRIF-induced interferon-stimulated response element and NF-κB activation and apoptosis pathways. J. Biol. Chem. 2004;279(15):15652–15661. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M311629200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 123.Baumgarten G., et al. In Vivo Expression of Proinflammatory mediators in the adult heart after endotoxin administration: the role of toll-like receptor–4. J. Infect. Dis. 2001;183(11):1617–1624. doi: 10.1086/320712. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 124.Garcia D., Shaw R.J. AMPK: mechanisms of cellular energy sensing and restoration of metabolic balance. Mol. Cell. 2017;66(6):789–800. doi: 10.1016/j.molcel.2017.05.032. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 125.Liu Y.-J., Chern Y. AMPK-mediated regulation of neuronal metabolism and function in brain diseases. J. Neurogenet. 2015;29(2–3):50–58. doi: 10.3109/01677063.2015.1067203. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 126.Hardie D.G. Minireview: the AMP-activated protein kinase cascade: the key sensor of cellular energy status. Endocrinology. 2003;144(12):5179–5183. doi: 10.1210/en.2003-0982. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 127.Xu Y., et al. Telmisartan prevention of LPS-induced microglia activation involves M2 microglia polarization via CaMKKβ-dependent AMPK activation. Brain Behav. Immun. 2015;50:298–313. doi: 10.1016/j.bbi.2015.07.015. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 128.Jin Q., et al. Improvement of functional recovery by chronic metformin treatment is associated with enhanced alternative activation of microglia/macrophages and increased angiogenesis and neurogenesis following experimental stroke. Brain Behav. Immun. 2014;40:131–142. doi: 10.1016/j.bbi.2014.03.003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 129.Bai A., et al. AMPK agonist downregulates innate and adaptive immune responses in TNBS-induced murine acute and relapsing colitis. Biochem. Pharmacol. 2010;80(11):1708–1717. doi: 10.1016/j.bcp.2010.08.009. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 130.Zhou X., et al. CaMKKβ-dependent activation of AMP-activated protein kinase is critical to suppressive effects of hydrogen sulfide on neuroinflammation. Antioxidants Redox Signal. 2014;21(12):1741–1758. doi: 10.1089/ars.2013.5587. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 131.Peyssonnaux C., Eychène A. The Raf/MEK/ERK pathway: new concepts of activation. Biol. Cell. 2001;93(1‐2):53–62. doi: 10.1016/s0248-4900(01)01125-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 132.Roberts P.J., Der C.J. Targeting the Raf-MEK-ERK mitogen-activated protein kinase cascade for the treatment of cancer. Oncogene. 2007;26(22):3291–3310. doi: 10.1038/sj.onc.1210422. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 133.Keyse S.M. Dual-specificity MAP kinase phosphatases (MKPs) and cancer. Cancer Metastasis Rev. 2008;27:253–261. doi: 10.1007/s10555-008-9123-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 134.Zhang H.-J., et al. MAPK/ERK signaling pathway: a potential target for the treatment of intervertebral disc degeneration. Biomed. Pharmacother. 2021;143 doi: 10.1016/j.biopha.2021.112170. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 135.Huang Y., et al. MEK inhibitor trametinib attenuates neuroinflammation and cognitive deficits following traumatic brain injury in mice. Am. J. Tourism Res. 2020;12(10):6351. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 136.Lucas R.M., Luo L., Stow J.L. ERK1/2 in immune signalling. Biochem. Soc. Trans. 2022;50(5):1341–1352. doi: 10.1042/BST20220271. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 137.Bardwell L. Mechanisms of MAPK signalling specificity. Biochem. Soc. Trans. 2006;34(Pt 5):837–841. doi: 10.1042/BST0340837. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 138.Ibrahim S.S.A., Huttunen K.M. Orchestrated modulation of rheumatoid arthritis via crosstalking intracellular signaling pathways. Inflammopharmacology. 2021;29(4):965–974. doi: 10.1007/s10787-021-00800-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 139.Samways D.S., Li Z., Egan T.M. Principles and properties of ion flow in P2X receptors. Front. Cell. Neurosci. 2014;8:6. doi: 10.3389/fncel.2014.00006. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 140.Cevoli F., et al. Untangling macropore formation and current facilitation in P2X7. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2023;24(13) doi: 10.3390/ijms241310896. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 141.Territo P.R., Zarrinmayeh H. P2X7 receptors in neurodegeneration: potential therapeutic applications from basic to clinical approaches. Front. Cell. Neurosci. 2021;15 doi: 10.3389/fncel.2021.617036. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 142.Zhao Y., et al. The spleen tyrosine kinase (SYK): a crucial therapeutic target for diverse liver diseases. Heliyon. 2022;8(12) doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2022.e12130. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 143.Nunes de Miranda S.M. RWTH Aachen University; Dissertation: 2018. Influence of the Two Negative Regulators SHIP1 and Lyn on the Antigen-Induced Mast Cell Phenotype. [Google Scholar]
  • 144.Currie K.S. In: Annual Reports in Medicinal Chemistry. Macor J.E., editor. Academic Press; 2010. Chapter 11 - targeting B-cells in inflammatory disease; pp. 175–190. [Google Scholar]
  • 145.Erlich S., et al. Rapamycin is a neuroprotective treatment for traumatic brain injury. Neurobiol. Dis. 2007;26(1):86–93. doi: 10.1016/j.nbd.2006.12.003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 146.Sarkar C., et al. Impaired autophagy flux is associated with neuronal cell death after traumatic brain injury. Autophagy. 2014;10(12):2208–2222. doi: 10.4161/15548627.2014.981787. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 147.Jiang H., et al. Toll-like receptor 4 knockdown attenuates brain damage and neuroinflammation after traumatic brain injury via inhibiting neuronal autophagy and astrocyte activation. Cell. Mol. Neurobiol. 2018;38(5):1009–1019. doi: 10.1007/s10571-017-0570-5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 148.Liu Y., et al. Extracellular signal-regulated kinase/nuclear factor-erythroid2-like2/heme oxygenase-1 pathway-mediated mitophagy alleviates traumatic brain injury-induced intestinal mucosa damage and epithelial barrier dysfunction. J. Neurotrauma. 2017;34(13):2119–2131. doi: 10.1089/neu.2016.4764. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 149.Tang C., et al. FGF2 attenuates neural cell death via suppressing autophagy after rat mild traumatic brain injury. Stem Cell. Int. 2017;2017 doi: 10.1155/2017/2923182. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 150.Manning B.D., Cantley L.C. AKT/PKB signaling: navigating downstream. Cell. 2007;129(7):1261–1274. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2007.06.009. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 151.Nellist M., et al. Identification and characterization of the interaction between tuberin and 14-3-3ζ. J. Biol. Chem. 2002;277(42):39417–39424. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M204802200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 152.Miyazaki M., McCarthy J.J., Esser K.A. Insulin like growth factor‐1‐induced phosphorylation and altered distribution of tuberous sclerosis complex (TSC) 1/TSC2 in C2C12 myotubes. FEBS J. 2010;277(9):2180–2191. doi: 10.1111/j.1742-4658.2010.07635.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 153.Wojcik S. Crosstalk between autophagy and proteasome protein degradation systems: possible implications for cancer therapy. Folia Histochem. Cytobiol. 2013;51(4):249–264. doi: 10.5603/FHC.2013.0036. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 154.Li L., et al. ROS and autophagy: interactions and molecular regulatory mechanisms. Cell. Mol. Neurobiol. 2015;35(5):615–621. doi: 10.1007/s10571-015-0166-x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 155.Pajares M., et al. Transcription factor NFE2L2/NRF2 is a regulator of macroautophagy genes. Autophagy. 2016;12(10):1902–1916. doi: 10.1080/15548627.2016.1208889. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 156.Zhang L., et al. Fucoxanthin provides neuroprotection in models of traumatic brain injury via the Nrf2-ARE and Nrf2-autophagy pathways. Sci. Rep. 2017;7(1):1–15. doi: 10.1038/srep46763. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 157.Noda N.N., et al. Structural basis of target recognition by Atg8/LC3 during selective autophagy. Gene Cell. 2008;13(12):1211–1218. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2443.2008.01238.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 158.Fan W., et al. Keap1 facilitates p62-mediated ubiquitin aggregate clearance via autophagy. Autophagy. 2010;6(5):614–621. doi: 10.4161/auto.6.5.12189. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 159.Sun L., et al. Suppression of FoxO3a attenuates neurobehavioral deficits after traumatic brain injury through inhibiting neuronal autophagy. Behav. Brain Res. 2018;337:271–279. doi: 10.1016/j.bbr.2017.08.042. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 160.Liu Z., et al. Imidazole inhibits autophagy flux by blocking autophagic degradation and triggers apoptosis via increasing FoxO3a-Bim expression. Int. J. Oncol. 2015;46(2):721–731. doi: 10.3892/ijo.2014.2771. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 161.Copetti T., et al. p65/RelA modulates BECN1 transcription and autophagy. Mol. Cell Biol. 2009;29(10):2594–2608. doi: 10.1128/MCB.01396-08. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 162.Koopman W.J., Willems P.H., Smeitink J.A. Monogenic mitochondrial disorders. N. Engl. J. Med. 2012;366(12):1132–1141. doi: 10.1056/NEJMra1012478. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 163.Wallace D.C., Fan W., Procaccio V. Mitochondrial energetics and therapeutics. Annu. Rev. Pathol. 2010;5:297–348. doi: 10.1146/annurev.pathol.4.110807.092314. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 164.Mehta M.M., Weinberg S.E., Chandel N.S. Mitochondrial control of immunity: beyond ATP. Nat. Rev. Immunol. 2017;17(10):608. doi: 10.1038/nri.2017.66. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 165.Nunnari J., Suomalainen A. Mitochondria: in sickness and in health. Cell. 2012;148(6):1145–1159. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2012.02.035. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 166.Suomalainen A., Battersby B.J. Mitochondrial diseases: the contribution of organelle stress responses to pathology. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 2018;19(2):77. doi: 10.1038/nrm.2017.66. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 167.Sorrentino V., Menzies K.J., Auwerx J. Repairing mitochondrial dysfunction in disease. Annu. Rev. Pharmacol. Toxicol. 2018;58:353–389. doi: 10.1146/annurev-pharmtox-010716-104908. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 168.Cheng G., et al. Mitochondria in traumatic brain injury and mitochondrial‐targeted multipotential therapeutic strategies. Br. J. Pharmacol. 2012;167(4):699–719. doi: 10.1111/j.1476-5381.2012.02025.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 169.Gajavelli S., et al. Evidence to support mitochondrial neuroprotection, in severe traumatic brain injury. J. Bioenerg. Biomembr. 2015;47(1–2):133–148. doi: 10.1007/s10863-014-9589-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 170.Singh I.N., et al. Time course of post-traumatic mitochondrial oxidative damage and dysfunction in a mouse model of focal traumatic brain injury: implications for neuroprotective therapy. J. Cerebr. Blood Flow Metabol. 2006;26(11):1407–1418. doi: 10.1038/sj.jcbfm.9600297. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 171.Gilmer L.K., et al. Early mitochondrial dysfunction after cortical contusion injury. J. Neurotrauma. 2009;26(8):1271–1280. doi: 10.1089/neu.2008.0857. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 172.Lifshitz J., et al. Structural and functional damage sustained by mitochondria after traumatic brain injury in the rat: evidence for differentially sensitive populations in the cortex and hippocampus. J. Cerebr. Blood Flow Metabol. 2003;23(2):219–231. doi: 10.1097/01.WCB.0000040581.43808.03. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 173.Lifshitz J., et al. Mitochondrial damage and dysfunction in traumatic brain injury. Mitochondrion. 2004;4(5–6):705–713. doi: 10.1016/j.mito.2004.07.021. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 174.Hubbard W.B., et al. Acute mitochondrial impairment underlies prolonged cellular dysfunction after repeated mild traumatic brain injuries. J. Neurotrauma. 2019;36(8):1252–1263. doi: 10.1089/neu.2018.5990. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 175.Chen Y., et al. Rapamycin improves the neuroprotection effect of inhibition of NLRP3 inflammasome activation after TBI. Brain Res. 2019;1710:163–172. doi: 10.1016/j.brainres.2019.01.005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 176.Moradi Vastegani S., et al. Anti-inflammatory, anti-apoptotic, and neuroprotective potentials of anethole in Parkinson's disease-like motor and non-motor symptoms induced by rotenone in rats. Metab. Brain Dis. 2023;38(6):2159–2174. doi: 10.1007/s11011-023-01230-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 177.Naga K.K., Sullivan P.G., Geddes J.W. High cyclophilin D content of synaptic mitochondria results in increased vulnerability to permeability transition. J. Neurosci. 2007;27(28):7469–7475. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0646-07.2007. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 178.Tsujimoto Y., Shimizu S. Role of the mitochondrial membrane permeability transition in cell death. Apoptosis. 2007;12(5):835–840. doi: 10.1007/s10495-006-0525-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 179.Sullivan P.G., et al. Cytochrome c release and caspase activation after traumatic brain injury. Brain Res. 2002;949(1–2):88–96. doi: 10.1016/s0006-8993(02)02968-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 180.Ismael S., et al. The NLRP3 inflammasome: a potential therapeutic target for traumatic brain injury. Neural Regeneration Research. 2021;16(1):49. doi: 10.4103/1673-5374.286951. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 181.Yin F., et al. Energy metabolism and inflammation in brain aging and Alzheimer's disease. Free Radic. Biol. Med. 2016;100:108–122. doi: 10.1016/j.freeradbiomed.2016.04.200. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 182.De Felice F.G., Lourenco M.V. Brain metabolic stress and neuroinflammation at the basis of cognitive impairment in Alzheimer's disease. Front. Aging Neurosci. 2015;7:94. doi: 10.3389/fnagi.2015.00094. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 183.Farbood Y., et al. Protective effects of co-administration of zinc and selenium against streptozotocin-induced Alzheimer's disease: behavioral, mitochondrial oxidative stress, and GPR39 expression alterations in rats. Neurotox. Res. 2020;38(2):398–407. doi: 10.1007/s12640-020-00226-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 184.Sliter D.A., et al. Parkin and PINK1 mitigate STING-induced inflammation. Nature. 2018;561(7722):258–262. doi: 10.1038/s41586-018-0448-9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] [Retracted]
  • 185.Lu M., et al. Mesenchymal stem cell-mediated mitochondrial transfer: a therapeutic approach for ischemic stroke. Translational Stroke Research. 2020:1–18. doi: 10.1007/s12975-020-00853-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 186.Chen W., et al. Mitochondrial transfer as a therapeutic strategy against ischemic stroke. Translational Stroke Research. 2020:1–15. doi: 10.1007/s12975-020-00828-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 187.He Z., et al. Mitochondria as a therapeutic target for ischemic stroke. Free Radic. Biol. Med. 2020;146:45–58. doi: 10.1016/j.freeradbiomed.2019.11.005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 188.Peruzzotti-Jametti L., Pluchino S. Targeting mitochondrial metabolism in neuroinflammation: towards a therapy for progressive multiple sclerosis. Trends Mol. Med. 2018;24(10):838–855. doi: 10.1016/j.molmed.2018.07.007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 189.Appel S.H., et al. The microglial-motoneuron dialogue in ALS. Acta Myol. 2011;30(1):4. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 190.Killen M.J., et al. Metabolism and inflammation: implications for traumatic brain injury therapeutics. Expert Rev. Neurother. 2019;19(3):227–242. doi: 10.1080/14737175.2019.1582332. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 191.Heid M.E., et al. Mitochondrial reactive oxygen species induces NLRP3-dependent lysosomal damage and inflammasome activation. J. Immunol. 2013;191(10):5230–5238. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.1301490. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 192.Gustin A., et al. NLRP3 inflammasome is expressed and functional in mouse brain microglia but not in astrocytes. PLoS One. 2015;10(6) doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0130624. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 193.Thompson M.R., et al. Pattern recognition receptors and the innate immune response to viral infection. Viruses. 2011;3(6):920–940. doi: 10.3390/v3060920. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 194.Zheng D., Liwinski T., Elinav E. Inflammasome activation and regulation: toward a better understanding of complex mechanisms. Cell Discov. 2020;6:36. doi: 10.1038/s41421-020-0167-x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 195.Kesavardhana S., Kanneganti T.D. Mechanisms governing inflammasome activation, assembly and pyroptosis induction. Int. Immunol. 2017;29(5):201–210. doi: 10.1093/intimm/dxx018. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 196.Lara-Reyna S., et al. Inflammasome activation: from molecular mechanisms to autoinflammation. Clin Transl Immunology. 2022;11(7) doi: 10.1002/cti2.1404. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 197.Zheng D., Liwinski T., Elinav E. Inflammasome activation and regulation: toward a better understanding of complex mechanisms. Cell Discovery. 2020;6(1):36. doi: 10.1038/s41421-020-0167-x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 198.Albensi B.C. What is nuclear factor kappa B (NF-κB) doing in and to the mitochondrion? Front. Cell Dev. Biol. 2019;7 doi: 10.3389/fcell.2019.00154. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 199.Joosten L.A.B., et al. Toll-like receptors and chronic inflammation in rheumatic diseases: new developments. Nat. Rev. Rheumatol. 2016;12(6):344–357. doi: 10.1038/nrrheum.2016.61. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 200.Yang Y., et al. Recent advances in the mechanisms of NLRP3 inflammasome activation and its inhibitors. Cell Death Dis. 2019;10(2):128. doi: 10.1038/s41419-019-1413-8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 201.Ohto U., et al. Structural basis for the oligomerization-mediated regulation of NLRP3 inflammasome activation. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 2022;119(11) doi: 10.1073/pnas.2121353119. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 202.Harry G.J., et al. An association between mitochondria and microglia effector function. What do we think we know? Neuroimmunology and neuroinflammation. 2020;7:150. doi: 10.20517/2347-8659.2020.07. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 203.Xu X., et al. Selective NLRP3 inflammasome inhibitor reduces neuroinflammation and improves long-term neurological outcomes in a murine model of traumatic brain injury. Neurobiol. Dis. 2018;117:15–27. doi: 10.1016/j.nbd.2018.05.016. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 204.Menu P., Vince J. The NLRP3 inflammasome in health and disease: the good, the bad and the ugly. Clin. Exp. Immunol. 2011;166(1):1–15. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2249.2011.04440.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 205.Bergsbaken T., Fink S.L., Cookson B.T. Pyroptosis: host cell death and inflammation. Nat. Rev. Microbiol. 2009;7(2):99–109. doi: 10.1038/nrmicro2070. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 206.O'Brien W.T., et al. The NLRP3 inflammasome in traumatic brain injury: potential as a biomarker and therapeutic target. J. Neuroinflammation. 2020;17:1–12. doi: 10.1186/s12974-020-01778-5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 207.Zhao Z., et al. Seminars in Thrombosis and Hemostasis. Thieme Medical Publishers; 2020. Extracellular mitochondria in traumatic brain injury induced coagulopathy. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 208.Garg A.D., et al. Immunogenic cell death, DAMPs and anticancer therapeutics: an emerging amalgamation. Biochimica et Biophysica Acta (BBA)-Reviews on Cancer. 2010;1805(1):53–71. doi: 10.1016/j.bbcan.2009.08.003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 209.Seong S.-Y., Matzinger P. Hydrophobicity: an ancient damage-associated molecular pattern that initiates innate immune responses. Nat. Rev. Immunol. 2004;4(6):469–478. doi: 10.1038/nri1372. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 210.Rubartelli A., Lotze M.T. Inside, outside, upside down: damage-associated molecular-pattern molecules (DAMPs) and redox. Trends Immunol. 2007;28(10):429–436. doi: 10.1016/j.it.2007.08.004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 211.Zhang Q., et al. Circulating mitochondrial DAMPs cause inflammatory responses to injury. Nature. 2010;464(7285):104–107. doi: 10.1038/nature08780. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 212.Zhao Z., et al. Cardiolipin-mediated procoagulant activity of mitochondria contributes to traumatic brain injury–associated coagulopathy in mice. Blood, The Journal of the American Society of Hematology. 2016;127(22):2763–2772. doi: 10.1182/blood-2015-12-688838. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 213.Puhm F., et al. Mitochondria are a subset of extracellular vesicles released by activated monocytes and induce type I IFN and TNF responses in endothelial cells. Circ. Res. 2019;125(1):43–52. doi: 10.1161/CIRCRESAHA.118.314601. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 214.Boudreau L.H., et al. Platelets release mitochondria serving as substrate for bactericidal group IIA-secreted phospholipase A2 to promote inflammation. Blood. 2014;124(14):2173–2183. doi: 10.1182/blood-2014-05-573543. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 215.Zhou R., et al. Thioredoxin-interacting protein links oxidative stress to inflammasome activation. Nat. Immunol. 2010;11(2):136. doi: 10.1038/ni.1831. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 216.Zhou R., et al. A role for mitochondria in NLRP3 inflammasome activation. Nature. 2011;469(7329):221–225. doi: 10.1038/nature09663. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 217.Subramanian N., et al. The adaptor MAVS promotes NLRP3 mitochondrial localization and inflammasome activation. Cell. 2013;153(2):348–361. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2013.02.054. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 218.Iyer S.S., et al. Mitochondrial cardiolipin is required for Nlrp3 inflammasome activation. Immunity. 2013;39(2):311–323. doi: 10.1016/j.immuni.2013.08.001. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 219.Agostini L., et al. NALP3 forms an IL-1β-processing inflammasome with increased activity in Muckle-Wells autoinflammatory disorder. Immunity. 2004;20(3):319–325. doi: 10.1016/s1074-7613(04)00046-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 220.Martinon F., Burns K., Tschopp J. The inflammasome: a molecular platform triggering activation of inflammatory caspases and processing of proIL-β. Mol. Cell. 2002;10(2):417–426. doi: 10.1016/s1097-2765(02)00599-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 221.Bauernfeind F., et al. Inflammasomes: current understanding and open questions. Cell. Mol. Life Sci. 2011;68(5):765–783. doi: 10.1007/s00018-010-0567-4. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 222.Lamkanfi M., Dixit V.M. Manipulation of host cell death pathways during microbial infections. Cell Host Microbe. 2010;8(1):44–54. doi: 10.1016/j.chom.2010.06.007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 223.Galluzzi L., Kepp O., Kroemer G. Mitochondria: master regulators of danger signalling. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 2012;13(12):780. doi: 10.1038/nrm3479. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 224.Shimada K., et al. Oxidized mitochondrial DNA activates the NLRP3 inflammasome during apoptosis. Immunity. 2012;36(3):401–414. doi: 10.1016/j.immuni.2012.01.009. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 225.Nakahira K., et al. Autophagy proteins regulate innate immune responses by inhibiting the release of mitochondrial DNA mediated by the NALP3 inflammasome. Nat. Immunol. 2011;12(3):222–230. doi: 10.1038/ni.1980. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 226.Nakahira K., et al. Autophagy proteins regulate innate immune responses by inhibiting the release of mitochondrial DNA mediated by the NALP3 inflammasome. Nat. Immunol. 2011;12(3):222–230. doi: 10.1038/ni.1980. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 227.Anu K. Handbook of Immunosenescence: Basic Understanding and Clinical Implication; 2017. Mitochondria-associated Inflammasome Activation and its Impact on Aging and Age-Related Diseases. [Google Scholar]
  • 228.Zhong Z., et al. New mitochondrial DNA synthesis enables NLRP3 inflammasome activation. Nature. 2018;560(7717):198–203. doi: 10.1038/s41586-018-0372-z. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 229.Gurung P., Lukens J.R., Kanneganti T.-D. Mitochondria: diversity in the regulation of the NLRP3 inflammasome. Trends Mol. Med. 2015;21(3):193–201. doi: 10.1016/j.molmed.2014.11.008. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 230.Zhou R., et al. A role for mitochondria in NLRP3 inflammasome activation. Nature. 2011;469(7329):221–225. doi: 10.1038/nature09663. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 231.Zheng X., Wan J., Tan G. The mechanisms of NLRP3 inflammasome/pyroptosis activation and their role in diabetic retinopathy. Front. Immunol. 2023;25(14) doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2023.1151185. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 232.Elliott E.I., et al. Cutting edge: mitochondrial assembly of the NLRP3 inflammasome complex is initiated at priming. J. Immunol. 2018;200(9):3047–3052. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.1701723. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 233.Kroemer G., et al. Classification of cell death: recommendations of the nomenclature committee on cell death. Cell Death Differ. 2005;12(12):1463–1467. doi: 10.1038/sj.cdd.4401724. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 234.Kroemer G., Galluzzi L., Brenner C. Mitochondrial membrane permeabilization in cell death. Physiol. Rev. 2007;87(1):99–163. doi: 10.1152/physrev.00013.2006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 235.Garrido C., et al. Mechanisms of cytochrome c release from mitochondria. Cell Death Differ. 2006;13(9):1423–1433. doi: 10.1038/sj.cdd.4401950. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 236.Lemasters J.J. Dying a thousand deaths: redundant pathways from different organelles to apoptosis and necrosis. Gastroenterology. 2005;129(1):351–360. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2005.06.006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 237.Beer R., et al. Temporal profile and cell subtype distribution of activated caspase‐3 following experimental traumatic brain injury. J. Neurochem. 2000;75(3):1264–1273. doi: 10.1046/j.1471-4159.2000.0751264.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 238.Grady M.S., et al. Neuronal and glial cell number in the hippocampus after experimental traumatic brain injury: analysis by stereological estimation. J. Neurotrauma. 2003;20(10):929–941. doi: 10.1089/089771503770195786. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 239.Raghupathi R. Cell death mechanisms following traumatic brain injury. Brain Pathol. 2004;14(2):215–222. doi: 10.1111/j.1750-3639.2004.tb00056.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 240.Stoica B.A., Faden A.I. Cell death mechanisms and modulation in traumatic brain injury. Neurotherapeutics. 2010;7(1):3–12. doi: 10.1016/j.nurt.2009.10.023. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 241.Yang J.L., Mukda S., Chen S.D. Diverse roles of mitochondria in ischemic stroke. Redox Biol. 2018;16:263–275. doi: 10.1016/j.redox.2018.03.002. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 242.Picard M., et al. Resistance to Ca2+-induced opening of the permeability transition pore differs in mitochondria from glycolytic and oxidative muscles. Am. J. Physiol. Regul. Integr. Comp. Physiol. 2008;295(2):R659–R668. doi: 10.1152/ajpregu.90357.2008. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 243.Halestrap A.P., McStay G.P., Clarke S.J. The permeability transition pore complex: another view. Biochimie. 2002;84(2–3):153–166. doi: 10.1016/s0300-9084(02)01375-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 244.Schinzel A.C., et al. Cyclophilin D is a component of mitochondrial permeability transition and mediates neuronal cell death after focal cerebral ischemia. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 2005;102(34):12005–12010. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0505294102. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 245.Nakagawa T., et al. Cyclophilin D-dependent mitochondrial permeability transition regulates some necrotic but not apoptotic cell death. Nature. 2005;434(7033):652. doi: 10.1038/nature03317. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 246.Baines C.P., et al. Loss of cyclophilin D reveals a critical role for mitochondrial permeability transition in cell death. Nature. 2005;434(7033):658. doi: 10.1038/nature03434. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 247.Giorgio V., et al. Calcium and regulation of the mitochondrial permeability transition. Cell Calcium. 2018;70:56–63. doi: 10.1016/j.ceca.2017.05.004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 248.Carraro M., Bernardi P. Calcium and reactive oxygen species in regulation of the mitochondrial permeability transition and of programmed cell death in yeast. Cell Calcium. 2016;60(2):102–107. doi: 10.1016/j.ceca.2016.03.005. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 249.Rasola A., Bernardi P. Mitochondrial permeability transition in Ca2+-dependent apoptosis and necrosis. Cell Calcium. 2011;50(3):222–233. doi: 10.1016/j.ceca.2011.04.007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 250.Rasola A., Bernardi P. The mitochondrial permeability transition pore and its involvement in cell death and in disease pathogenesis. Apoptosis. 2007;12(5):815–833. doi: 10.1007/s10495-007-0723-y. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 251.Li P., et al. Cytochrome c and dATP-dependent formation of Apaf-1/caspase-9 complex initiates an apoptotic protease cascade. Cell. 1997;91(4):479–489. doi: 10.1016/s0092-8674(00)80434-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 252.Yoshida H., et al. Apaf1 is required for mitochondrial pathways of apoptosis and brain development. Cell. 1998;94(6):739–750. doi: 10.1016/s0092-8674(00)81733-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 253.Zou H., et al. Apaf-1, a human protein homologous to C. elegans CED-4, participates in cytochrome c–dependent activation of caspase-3. Cell. 1997;90(3):405–413. doi: 10.1016/s0092-8674(00)80501-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 254.Zhang X., et al. Caspase‐8 expression and proteolysis in human brain after severe head injury. Faseb. J. 2003;17(10):1367–1369. doi: 10.1096/fj.02-1067fje. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 255.Saelens X., et al. Toxic proteins released from mitochondria in cell death. Oncogene. 2004;23(16):2861. doi: 10.1038/sj.onc.1207523. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 256.Green D.R., Kroemer G. The pathophysiology of mitochondrial cell death. Science. 2004;305(5684):626–629. doi: 10.1126/science.1099320. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 257.Mammis A., McIntosh T.K., Maniker A.H. Erythropoietin as a neuroprotective agent in traumatic brain injury. Surg. Neurol. 2009;71(5):527–531. doi: 10.1016/j.surneu.2008.02.040. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 258.Hong S.J., Dawson T.M., Dawson V.L. Nuclear and mitochondrial conversations in cell death: PARP-1 and AIF signaling. Trends Pharmacol. Sci. 2004;25(5):259–264. doi: 10.1016/j.tips.2004.03.005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 259.Wennersten A., Holmin S., Mathiesen T. Characterization of Bax and Bcl-2 in apoptosis after experimental traumatic brain injury in the rat. Acta Neuropathol. 2003;105(3):281–288. doi: 10.1007/s00401-002-0649-y. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 260.Clark R.S., et al. Increases in Bcl‐2 and cleavage of caspase‐1 and caspase‐3 in human brain after head injury. Faseb. J. 1999;13(8):813–821. doi: 10.1096/fasebj.13.8.813. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 261.Raghupathi R., et al. Temporal alterations in cellular Bax: Bcl-2 ratio following traumatic brain injury in the rat. J. Neurotrauma. 2003;20(5):421–435. doi: 10.1089/089771503765355504. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 262.Fakharnia F., et al. Prevention of cyclophilin D-mediated mPTP opening using cyclosporine-A alleviates the elevation of necroptosis, autophagy and apoptosis-related markers following global cerebral ischemia-reperfusion. J. Mol. Neurosci. 2017;61(1):52–60. doi: 10.1007/s12031-016-0843-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 263.Fei M., et al. Podoplanin influences the inflammatory phenotypes and mobility of microglia in traumatic brain injury. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 2020;523(2):361–367. doi: 10.1016/j.bbrc.2019.12.003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 264.Culmsee C., et al. Mitochondria, microglia, and the immune system—how are they linked in affective disorders? Front. Psychiatr. 2019;9:739. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2018.00739. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 265.Urrutia P.J., Mena N.P., Nunez M.T. The interplay between iron accumulation, mitochondrial dysfunction, and inflammation during the execution step of neurodegenerative disorders. Front. Pharmacol. 2014;5:38. doi: 10.3389/fphar.2014.00038. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 266.Galván-Peña S., O'Neill L.A. Metabolic reprograming in macrophage polarization. Front. Immunol. 2014;5:420. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2014.00420. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 267.Gong Z., et al. Mitochondrial dysfunction induces NLRP3 inflammasome activation during cerebral ischemia/reperfusion injury. J. Neuroinflammation. 2018;15(1):242. doi: 10.1186/s12974-018-1282-6. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 268.Ślusarczyk J., et al. Targeting the NLRP3 inflammasome-related pathways via tianeptine treatment-suppressed microglia polarization to the M1 phenotype in lipopolysaccharide-stimulated cultures. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2018;19(7):1965. doi: 10.3390/ijms19071965. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 269.Rothlin C.V., et al. TAM receptor signaling in immune homeostasis. Annu. Rev. Immunol. 2015;33:355–391. doi: 10.1146/annurev-immunol-032414-112103. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 270.Cai B., et al. MerTK signaling in macrophages promotes the synthesis of inflammation resolution mediators by suppressing CaMKII activity. Sci. Signal. 2018;11(549):3721. doi: 10.1126/scisignal.aar3721. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 271.Fourgeaud L., et al. TAM receptors regulate multiple features of microglial physiology. Nature. 2016;532(7598):240–244. doi: 10.1038/nature17630. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 272.Raible D.J., et al. JAK/STAT pathway regulation of GABAA receptor expression after differing severities of experimental TBI. Exp. Neurol. 2015;271:445–456. doi: 10.1016/j.expneurol.2015.07.001. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 273.Yan B.C., et al. Neuroprotective effects of gabapentin against cerebral ischemia reperfusion-induced neuronal autophagic injury via regulation of the PI3K/Akt/mTOR signaling pathways. J. Neuropathol. Exp. Neurol. 2019;78(2):157–171. doi: 10.1093/jnen/nly119. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 274.Bhat S.A., et al. Enhanced Akt/GSK‐3β/CREB signaling mediates the anti‐inflammatory actions of mGluR5 positive allosteric modulators in microglia and following traumatic brain injury in male mice. J. Neurochem. 2021;156(2):225–248. doi: 10.1111/jnc.14954. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 275.Loane D.J., et al. Activation of mGluR5 and inhibition of NADPH oxidase improves functional recovery after traumatic brain injury. J. Neurotrauma. 2013;30(5):403–412. doi: 10.1089/neu.2012.2589. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 276.Zusso M., et al. Ciprofloxacin and levofloxacin attenuate microglia inflammatory response via TLR4/NF-kB pathway. J. Neuroinflammation. 2019;16(1):1–12. doi: 10.1186/s12974-019-1538-9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 277.Feng Y., et al. Resveratrol attenuates neuronal autophagy and inflammatory injury by inhibiting the TLR4/NF-κB signaling pathway in experimental traumatic brain injury. Int. J. Mol. Med. 2016;37(4):921–930. doi: 10.3892/ijmm.2016.2495. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 278.Gao T., et al. Inhibition of HMGB1 mediates neuroprotection of traumatic brain injury by modulating the microglia/macrophage polarization. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 2018;497(1):430–436. doi: 10.1016/j.bbrc.2018.02.102. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 279.Li L., Lu Y.-Q. The regulatory role of high-mobility group protein 1 in sepsis-related immunity. Front. Immunol. 2021;22(11):3575. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2020.601815. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 280.Zhu H.-t., et al. Curcumin attenuates acute inflammatory injury by inhibiting the TLR4/MyD88/NF-κB signaling pathway in experimental traumatic brain injury. J. Neuroinflammation. 2014;11(1):1–17. doi: 10.1186/1742-2094-11-59. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 281.Blaya M.O., et al. Neural progenitor cell transplantation promotes neuroprotection, enhances hippocampal neurogenesis, and improves cognitive outcomes after traumatic brain injury. Exp. Neurol. 2015;264:67–81. doi: 10.1016/j.expneurol.2014.11.014. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 282.Ji S., et al. Increased hippocampal TrkA expression ameliorates cranial radiation-induced neurogenesis impairment and cognitive deficit via PI3K/AKT signaling. Oncol. Rep. 2020;44(6):2527–2536. doi: 10.3892/or.2020.7782. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 283.Atkins C.M. Decoding hippocampal signaling deficits after traumatic brain injury. Translational Stroke Research. 2011;2(4):546–555. doi: 10.1007/s12975-011-0123-z. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 284.Farbood Y., et al. Ellagic acid prevents cognitive and hippocampal long-term potentiation deficits and brain inflammation in rat with traumatic brain injury. Life Sci. 2015;124:120–127. doi: 10.1016/j.lfs.2015.01.013. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 285.Navabi S.P., et al. The effects of betulinic acid on neurobehavioral activity, electrophysiology and histological changes in an animal model of the Alzheimer's disease. Behav. Brain Res. 2018;337:99–106. doi: 10.1016/j.bbr.2017.10.002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 286.Sarkaki A., et al. The protective effect of betulinic acid on microvascular responsivity and protein expression in alzheimer disease induced by cerebral micro‐injection of beta‐amyloid and streptozotocin. Microcirculation. 2018;25(8) doi: 10.1111/micc.12503. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 287.Bruel-Jungerman E., et al. Long-term potentiation enhances neurogenesis in the adult dentate gyrus. J. Neurosci. 2006;26(22):5888–5893. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0782-06.2006. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 288.Ma S., et al. Sodium alginate/collagen/stromal cell-derived factor-1 neural scaffold loaded with BMSCs promotes neurological function recovery after traumatic brain injury. Acta Biomater. 2021;131:185–197. doi: 10.1016/j.actbio.2021.06.038. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 289.Gemma C., Bachstetter A.D. The role of microglia in adult hippocampal neurogenesis. Front. Cell. Neurosci. 2013;7:229. doi: 10.3389/fncel.2013.00229. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 290.Kleindienst A., et al. Enhanced hippocampal neurogenesis by intraventricular S100B infusion is associated with improved cognitive recovery after traumatic brain injury. J. Neurotrauma. 2005;22(6):645–655. doi: 10.1089/neu.2005.22.645. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 291.Zhou Y., et al. Dual roles of astrocytes in plasticity and reconstruction after traumatic brain injury. Cell Commun. Signal. 2020;18(1):1–16. doi: 10.1186/s12964-020-00549-2. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 292.Jurga A.M., et al. Beyond the GFAP-astrocyte protein markers in the brain. Biomolecules. 2021;11(9) doi: 10.3390/biom11091361. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 293.Zhao S., et al. Activation of Akt/GSK-3beta/beta-catenin signaling pathway is involved in survival of neurons after traumatic brain injury in rats. Neurol. Res. 2012;34(4):400–407. doi: 10.1179/1743132812Y.0000000025. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 294.Irrera N., et al. Lack of the Nlrp3 inflammasome improves mice recovery following traumatic brain injury. Front. Pharmacol. 2017;8:459. doi: 10.3389/fphar.2017.00459. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 295.Mishra J., et al. Cyclosporin A increases mitochondrial buffering of calcium: an additional mechanism in delaying mitochondrial permeability transition pore opening. Cells. 2019;8(9):1052. doi: 10.3390/cells8091052. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 296.Xiao A., et al. GDF11 alleviates secondary brain injury after intracerebral hemorrhage via attenuating mitochondrial dynamic abnormality and dysfunction. Sci. Rep. 2021;11(1):3974. doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-83545-x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 297.Sun J., et al. Targeted delivery of PARP inhibitors to neuronal mitochondria via biomimetic engineered nanosystems in a mouse model of traumatic brain injury. Acta Biomater. 2022;140:573–585. doi: 10.1016/j.actbio.2021.12.023. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 298.Zhu Y., et al. SS-31 provides neuroprotection by reversing mitochondrial dysfunction after traumatic brain injury. Oxid. Med. Cell. Longev. 2018;2018 doi: 10.1155/2018/4783602. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 299.Zhou J., et al. Mitochondrial-targeted antioxidant MitoQ provides neuroprotection and reduces neuronal apoptosis in experimental traumatic brain injury possibly via the Nrf2-ARE pathway. Am J Transl Res. 2018;10(6):1887–1899. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 300.Patel S.P., et al. N-acetylcysteine amide preserves mitochondrial bioenergetics and improves functional recovery following spinal trauma. Exp. Neurol. 2014;257:95–105. doi: 10.1016/j.expneurol.2014.04.026. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 301.Zhang S., et al. Adiponectin/AdiopR1 signaling prevents mitochondrial dysfunction and oxidative injury after traumatic brain injury in a SIRT3 dependent manner. Redox Biol. 2022;54 doi: 10.1016/j.redox.2022.102390. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 302.Zhou J., et al. Mitochondrial-targeted antioxidant MitoQ provides neuroprotection and reduces neuronal apoptosis in experimental traumatic brain injury possibly via the Nrf2-ARE pathway. Am. J. Tourism Res. 2018;10(6):1887. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 303.Lin C.J., et al. Resveratrol protects astrocytes against traumatic brain injury through inhibiting apoptotic and autophagic cell death. Cell Death Dis. 2014;5(3):e1147. doi: 10.1038/cddis.2014.123. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 304.Li L., et al. Polydatin prevents the induction of secondary brain injury after traumatic brain injury by protecting neuronal mitochondria. Neural Regen Res. 2019;14(9):1573–1582. doi: 10.4103/1673-5374.255972. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 305.Ye Y., et al. Electroacupuncture improved hippocampal neurogenesis following traumatic brain injury in mice through inhibition of TLR4 signaling pathway. Stem Cell. Int. 2017;2017 doi: 10.1155/2017/5841814. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 306.Yang Y., et al. MiR-124 enriched exosomes promoted the M2 polarization of microglia and enhanced hippocampus neurogenesis after traumatic brain injury by inhibiting TLR4 pathway. Neurochem. Res. 2019;44(4):811–828. doi: 10.1007/s11064-018-02714-z. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 307.Ma S., et al. SA/Col/SDF-1 neural scaffold promotes the homing of BMSCs and functional recovery in a rat model of traumatic brain injury. Acta Biomater. 2021 [Google Scholar]
  • 308.Yang Y., et al. MSCs-derived exosomes and neuroinflammation, neurogenesis and therapy of traumatic brain injury. Front. Cell. Neurosci. 2017;11:55. doi: 10.3389/fncel.2017.00055. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 309.Lu K.-T., et al. NKCC1 mediates traumatic brain injury-induced hippocampal neurogenesis through CREB phosphorylation and HIF-1α expression. Pflueg. Arch. Eur. J. Physiol. 2015;467(8):1651–1661. doi: 10.1007/s00424-014-1588-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 310.Thau-Zuchman O., et al. Vascular endothelial growth factor increases neurogenesis after traumatic brain injury. J. Cerebr. Blood Flow Metabol. 2010;30(5):1008–1016. doi: 10.1038/jcbfm.2009.271. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 311.White B.D., et al. β-Catenin signaling increases in proliferating NG2+ progenitors and astrocytes during post-traumatic gliogenesis in the adult brain. Stem Cell. 2010;28(2):297–307. doi: 10.1002/stem.268. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 312.Zhang L., et al. Survivin, a key component of the Wnt/β-catenin signaling pathway, contributes to traumatic brain injury-induced adult neurogenesis in the mouse dentate gyrus. Int. J. Mol. Med. 2013;32(4):867–875. doi: 10.3892/ijmm.2013.1456. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 313.Zhang L., et al. The Wnt/β‐catenin signaling pathway in the adult neurogenesis. Eur. J. Neurosci. 2011;33(1):1–8. doi: 10.1111/j.1460-9568.2010.7483.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 314.Bikkavilli R.K., Malbon C.C. Mitogen-activated protein kinases and Wnt/beta-catenin signaling: molecular conversations among signaling pathways. Commun. Integr. Biol. 2009;2(1):46–49. doi: 10.4161/cib.2.1.7503. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 315.Alizadeh A., Dyck S.M., Karimi-Abdolrezaee S. Myelin damage and repair in pathologic CNS: challenges and prospects. Front. Mol. Neurosci. 2015;8:35. doi: 10.3389/fnmol.2015.00035. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 316.Briona L.K., et al. Wnt/ß-catenin signaling is required for radial glial neurogenesis following spinal cord injury. Dev. Biol. 2015;403(1):15–21. doi: 10.1016/j.ydbio.2015.03.025. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 317.Fehlings K.-A.S.E.E., Temporal M.J.E.J.N. Spatial patterns of Kv1. 1 and Kv1. 2 protein and gene expression in spinal cord white matter after acute and chronic spinal cord injury in rats: implications for axonal pathophysiology after neurotrauma. Eur. J. Neurosci. 2004;19:577–589. doi: 10.1111/j.0953-816x.2004.03164.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 318.Kopan R. Notch signaling. Cold Spring Harbor Perspect. Biol. 2012;4(10):a011213. doi: 10.1101/cshperspect.a011213. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 319.Zhuang Y., et al. A narrative review of the role of the Notch signaling pathway in rheumatoid arthritis. Ann. Transl. Med. 2022;10(6):371. doi: 10.21037/atm-22-142. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 320.Cao Q., et al. Production of proinflammatory mediators in activated microglia is synergistically regulated by Notch-1, glycogen synthase kinase (GSK-3β) and NF-κB/p65 signalling. PLoS One. 2017;12(10) doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0186764. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 321.Cheng Y.-Y., et al. Reactive astrocytes display pro-inflammatory adaptability with modulation of Notch-PI3K-AKT signaling pathway under inflammatory stimulation. Neuroscience. 2020;440:130–145. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroscience.2020.05.023. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 322.Engler A., Zhang R., Taylor V. Notch and neurogenesis. Molecular mechanisms of notch signaling. 2018:223–234. doi: 10.1007/978-3-319-89512-3_11. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 323.Ho D.M., Artavanis‐Tsakonas S., Louvi A. The Notch pathway in CNS homeostasis and neurodegeneration. Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Dev. Biol. 2020;9(1) doi: 10.1002/wdev.358. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 324.Zhang Z., et al. Hes1, a Notch signaling downstream target, regulates adult hippocampal neurogenesis following traumatic brain injury. Brain Res. 2014;1583:65–78. doi: 10.1016/j.brainres.2014.07.037. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 325.Li T., et al. Targeted inhibition of STAT3 in neural stem cells promotes neuronal differentiation and functional recovery in rats with spinal cord injury. Exp. Ther. Med. 2021;22(1):1–11. doi: 10.3892/etm.2021.10143. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 326.Liu Y., et al. Downregulation of STAT1 induces the differentiation of neural stem cells through JNK pathway. Tissue Cell. 2019;61:61–66. doi: 10.1016/j.tice.2019.09.004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 327.Wang T., et al. The role of the JAK-STAT pathway in neural stem cells, neural progenitor cells and reactive astrocytes after spinal cord injury. Biomedical Reports. 2015;3(2):141–146. doi: 10.3892/br.2014.401. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 328.Famakin B.M., et al. HMGB1 is a potential mediator of astrocytic TLR4 signaling activation following acute and chronic focal cerebral ischemia. Neurology Research International. 2020:2020. doi: 10.1155/2020/3929438. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 329.Manivannan S., et al. Neurogenesis after traumatic brain injury-The complex role of HMGB1 and neuroinflammation. Neuropharmacology. 2021;183 doi: 10.1016/j.neuropharm.2020.108400. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 330.Li Y., et al. Renshen Shouwu extract enhances neurogenesis and angiogenesis via inhibition of TLR4/NF-κB/NLRP3 signaling pathway following ischemic stroke in rats. J. Ethnopharmacol. 2020;253 doi: 10.1016/j.jep.2020.112616. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 331.Fusco R., et al. Formyl peptide receptor 1 signaling in acute inflammation and neural differentiation induced by traumatic brain injury. Biology. 2020;9(9):238. doi: 10.3390/biology9090238. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] [Retracted]
  • 332.Ye Y., et al. Electroacupuncture improved hippocampal neurogenesis following traumatic brain injury in mice through inhibition of TLR4 signaling pathway. Stem Cell. Int. 2017;20 doi: 10.1155/2017/5841814. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 333.Wu H., et al. Simvastatin-mediated upregulation of VEGF and BDNF, activation of the PI3K/Akt pathway, and increase of neurogenesis are associated with therapeutic improvement after traumatic brain injury. J. Neurotrauma. 2008;25(2):130–139. doi: 10.1089/neu.2007.0369. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 334.Loane D.J., Kumar A. Microglia in the TBI brain: the good, the bad, and the dysregulated. Exp. Neurol. 2016;275:316–327. doi: 10.1016/j.expneurol.2015.08.018. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 335.Beurel E., Jope R.S. Lipopolysaccharide-induced interleukin-6 production is controlled by glycogen synthase kinase-3 and STAT3 in the brain. J. Neuroinflammation. 2009;6:1–11. doi: 10.1186/1742-2094-6-9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 336.Liang Y.B., et al. Downregulated SOCS1 expression activates the JAK1/STAT1 pathway and promotes polarization of macrophages into M1 type. Mol. Med. Rep. 2017;16(5):6405–6411. doi: 10.3892/mmr.2017.7384. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 337.Battaglini D., et al. Novel synthetic and natural therapies for traumatic brain injury. Curr. Neuropharmacol. 2021;19(10):1661. doi: 10.2174/1570159X19666210225145957. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 338.Gravandi M.M., et al. Therapeutic targeting of Ras/Raf/MAPK pathway by natural products: a systematic and mechanistic approach for neurodegeneration. Phytomedicine. 2023;115 doi: 10.1016/j.phymed.2023.154821. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 339.Liu Q., et al. The role of mitochondria in NLRP3 inflammasome activation. Mol. Immunol. 2018;103:115–124. doi: 10.1016/j.molimm.2018.09.010. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 340.Litwiniuk A., et al. Contribution of mitochondrial dysfunction combined with NLRP3 inflammasome activation in selected neurodegenerative diseases. Pharmaceuticals. 2021;14(12):1221. doi: 10.3390/ph14121221. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Data Availability Statement

The authors confirm that the data supporting the findings of this study are available within the article.


Articles from Heliyon are provided here courtesy of Elsevier

RESOURCES