TABLE 14.

Comparative analysis of our innovative LDCNN technique for arrhythmia detection with a range of contemporary techniques using the MIT‐BIH Arrhythmia dataset, with metrics for all listed techniques taken directly from their respective publications.

Techniques	Accuracy (%)	Precision (%)	Recall (%)	F1 score (%)
Atal & Singh, (2020)	93.19	‐	93.98	‐
Sharma et al. (2021)	95.63	99.03	92.73	95.77
Farag, (2023)	98.18	92.44	91.90	92.17
Kumar et al. (2023)	98.66	98.92	93.88	96.34
Fradi et al. (2021)	99.34	‐	‐	99.54
Proposed LDCNN	99.38	99.60	99.40	99.60

The bolding indicates that these results are particularly noteworthy and represent key findings of our study.