Skip to main content
. 2024 Aug 19;14:1438982. doi: 10.3389/fcimb.2024.1438982

Figure 2.

Figure 2

The performance of mNGS and CTM in patients with different prognoses. (A) Comparison of mNGS and CTM detection (B) The sensitivity of mNGS and CTM in HIV and non-HIV group (C) Prognosis of patients in HIV and non-HIV group. CTM, conventional methods.