Table 4.
Performance and design cost comparison of 1-to-4 DeMux.
| Circuit | Cell |
Areamul. |
Delay |
Sum_Ebath |
CostAD |
CostED |
AOP |
Crossover | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| no. | μm2 | clock cycle | 10−2 eV | AD2 | ratio | E2D2 | ratio | 10–1 | ||
| [14] | 198 | 0.2099 | 1.00 | 6.63 | 0.210 | 4.26 | 43.96 | 11.38 | 9.541 | cell rotation |
| [16] | 187 | 0.1439 | 1.75 | 4.06 | 0.441 | 8.94 | 50.48 | 13.07 | 9.521 | clock phase |
| [18] | 90 | 0.1055 | 1.00 | 4.02 | 0.105 | 2.14 | 16.16 | 4.19 | 9.543 | cell rotation |
| [23] | 140 | 0.3749 | 1.00 | 4.77 | 0.375 | 7.61 | 22.75 | 5.89 | 9.545 | multi-layer |
| [17] | 72 | 0.1818 | 0.75 | 2.76 | 0.102 | 2.07 | 4.28 | 1.11 | 9.546 | multi-layer |
| Fig. 8 | 64 | 0.0876 | 0.75 | 2.62 | 0.049 | 1.00 | 3.86 | 1.00 | 9.555 | multi-layer |