Table 1.
Comparative overview of gene editing interventions on LDLR.
Author | Study design | Method | Findings | Treatment-related adverse effects |
Carlson et al. [36] | Pig | TALEN | Biallelic inactivation of LDLR in 10 out of 11 animals | - |
Huang et al. [37] | Pig | CRISPR/Cas9 | Biallelic inactivation of ApoE and LDLR in all animals | No off-target mutations were found. |
Elevated plasma levels of LDL-C, ApoB, and TC | ||||
Omer et al. [38] | Human iPSC | CRISPR/Cas9 | Both alleles of 83% of enriched clones were corrected | No off-target mutations were detected. |
Jarrett et al. [39] | Cas9 transgenic mice | AAV-CRISPR | LDLR disruption led to hypercholesteremia and atherosclerosis | Off-target sites were found for the LDLR gene, but not ApoB. |
ApoB disruption led to lower levels of cholesterol | Mice received LDLR + ApoB gRNAs showed evidence of microvesicular steatosis. | |||
Zhao et al. [40] | LdlrE208X mouse | AAV-CRISPR/Cas9 | LDLR expression restored partly | Most of off-target mutations were found in introns of different genes. |
Lowered plasma levels of cholesterol, TG, and LDL-C |
LDLR, low density lipoprotein receptor; CRISPR, clustered regularly interspaced short palindromic repeats; Cas9, CRISPR-associated protein 9; TALEN, transcription activator-like effector nuclease; ApoB, apolipoprotein B; ApoE, apolipoprotein E; LDL-C, low density lipoprotein cholesterol; TG, triglyceride; iPSC, induced-pluripotent stem cell; AAV, adeno-associated virus; gRNAs, guide RNAs; TC, total cholesterol.