Skip to main content
. 2024 Sep 1;9(3):184–191. doi: 10.22540/JFSF-09-184

Table 2.

Comparison of variables after nutritional and physical intervention in geriatric rehabilitation center.

Variables Baseline 12-week intervention Mean Difference Effect Size 95% CI Lower 95% CI Upper p
Weight (kg) 58.9 ± 17.4 60.0 ± 16.6 1.1 ± 1.5 0.06 -0.33 0.45 < 0.001*
BMI (kg/m2) 22.3 ± 5.2 22.9 ± 4.8 0.5 ± 0.6 0.12 -0.27 0.51 < 0.001*
SARC-CalF 13.2 ± 1.7 7.9 ± 4.1 -5.2 ± 4.4 -3.12 -3.70 -2.48 < 0.001*
Anthropometric measures
 CC (cm) 30.7 ± 2.2 32.6 ± 2.5 1.9 ± 2.5 0.84 0.44 1.23 < 0.001*
 MUAC (cm) 26.1 ± 4.6 26.2 ± 4.5 0.1 ± 0.5 0.02 -0.37 0.41 0.262
HGS (kg) 16.4 ± 5.9 21.8 ± 5.6 5.4 ± 2.1 0.92 0.51 1.31 < 0.001*
TUG (s) 18.9 ± 9.6 16.6 ± 7.8 -2.4 ± 4.8 -0.24 -0.63 -0.16 0.001*
BIA
 FM (kg) 15.0 ± 7.8 15.1 ± 7.5 0.1 ± 1.2 0.01 -0.38 0.40 0.486
 FFM (kg) 43.9 ± 11.6 44.9 ± 11.2 1.0 ± 1.3 0.09 -0.30 0.48 < 0.001*
 SMM (kg) 22.4 ± 6.2 23.3 ± 6.1 0.9 ± 0.5 0.15 -0.24 0.53 < 0.001*
 PA (°) 4.2 ± 0.5 4.3 ± 0.5 0.1 ± 0.2 0.20 -0.19 0.59 0.002*

BMI: body mass index; SARC-CalF: strength, assistance with walking, rising from a chair, climbing stairs, falls, and calf circumference; CC: calf circumference; MUAC: mid upper arm circumference; HGS: handgrip strength; TUG: Timed Up and Go; BIA: bioelectrical impedance analysis; FM: fat mass; FFM: free fat mass; SMM: skeletal muscle mass; PA: phase angle.

*

Paired t test.