Skip to main content
. 2024 Aug 29;17:2055–2065. doi: 10.2147/RMHP.S467471

Table 1.

Descriptive Statistics Before and After DIP Payment Reform Among Inpatients in W and Z Cities

Before DIP Reform (January–June 2021) After DIP Reform (January–June 2022)
W City Z City W City Z City
(1) (2) (3) (4)
Outcome variables
Total expenditure per case, mean (SD), RMB 5,398.51 6,137.59 5,262.17 6,298.58
(6,857.89) (8,903.13) (5,978.83) (8,880.15)
In-hospital mortality rate (%) 0.14 0.17 0.09 0.13
All-cause readmission rate within 30 days after discharge (%) 6.03 5.44 5.66 6.81
Proportion of severe patients (%) 48.18 51.89 50.59 50.00
Related weight per case, mean (SD) 0.96 0.99 0.94 1.01
(0.80) (0.88) (0.70) (0.94)
Patient characteristics
Age, mean (SD), years 50.81 50.64 52.03 50.61
(22.53) (23.63) (21.71) (23.38)
Female (%) 53.17 51.69 52.24 52.18
UEBMI (%) 11.85 13.16 16.02 13.29
Charlson Comorbidity Index, mean (SD) 0.43 0.53 0.53 0.56
(0.76) (0.94) (0.92) (0.96)
Hospital level (%)
Tertiary (NW = 5, NZ = 3) 40.47 39.84 52.12 38.74
Secondary (NW = 14, NZ = 20) 59.53 60.16 47.88 61.26
Sample size 71,297 58,455 92,139 74,421

Notes: DIP denoted the diagnosis-intervention packet payment reform. The UEBMI was a basic medical insurance scheme for urban employees. NW and NZ denoted the number of hospitals in cities W and Z, respectively.