Table 1.
General characteristics of the included studies.
| Ref. | Country | Sample size (total) | Title | Aim of the study | Diagnostic techniques used | AI tool used | Limitations of the study |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Liu et al. (2023) | China | 30 patients | Diagnosis of primary clear cell carcinoma of the liver based on Faster RCNN | Establish a Faster RCNN model for differential diagnosis of PCCCL and CHCC | Deep learning analysis of CT images | Faster RCNN | Single center study. -The sample size of the patients with PCCCL was small. |
| Gao et al. (2021) | China | 159 patients | Deep learning for differential diagnosis of malignant hepatic tumors based on multiphase CECT and clinical data | Develop an automatic diagnostic model to differentiate types of malignant hepatic tumors | Multiphase CECT | Deep learning model (STIC) | Single-center study. -A limited number of imaging studies. Only typical lesions on MRI were used, excluding lesions with poor quality and more complex lesion types such as infiltrative HCC or complicated cysts. -Pathological proof was not available for all lesions. |
| Hamm et al. (2019) | USA | 296 patients | Deep learning for liver tumor diagnosis part I: development of a CNN classifier for multiphasic MRI | Develop a CNN for classifying hepatic lesions on multiphasic MRI | Multiphasic MRI | Custom CNN | Relatively small training and testing dataset. -The included group was heterogeneous in terms of tumor types. -Insufficient number for some categories, such as focal nodular hyperplasia, liver abscess, liver adenoma, and cholangiocarcinoma. -Using only one type of ultrasound equipment and a single contrast agent for ultrasound. -Valuable information collected in daily clinical practice, such as tumoral markers, was not integrated. |
| Kim et al. (2020) | South Korea | 950 images | Detection of Hepatocellular Carcinoma in Contrast-Enhanced MRI Using Deep Learning Classifier | Develop a deep learning model for detecting HCC using MRI | Contrast-enhanced MRI | Fine-tuned CNN | The image quality of the arterial phase was affected by transient severe motion artifacts. -The training dataset was obtained from a single vendor. -The study population had relatively good liver function. -The model is unable to detect atypical HCCs and low signal intensity in hepatobiliary phase MRI. |
| Urhuț et al. (2023) | Romania | 49 patients | Diagnostic Performance of an AI Model Based on CEUS in Patients with Liver Lesions | Evaluate the accuracy of an automated method for classifying liver lesions using CEUS | CEUS (contrast-enhance ultrasound) | AI system based on algorithms | Single center study. -Lesions segmentation in the training validation set was done manually by doctors. |
| Nishida et al. (2022) | Japan | 55 patients | Artificial intelligence models for the ultrasonographic diagnosis of liver tumors | Construct AI models for diagnosing liver tumors using ultrasonography | B-mode ultrasonography | CNNs based on VGGNet | A single-center retrospective study. -Patients who have specific types of focal liver diseases (small HCC, HCC without pathology, inflammation, etc.) need to be included in future training. |
| Zhen et al. (2020) | China | 201 patients | Deep Learning for Accurate Diagnosis of Liver Tumor Based on MRI and Clinical Data | Develop a DLS for classifying liver tumors based on MRI and clinical data | Enhanced and unenhanced MRI | CNNs based on Inception-ResNet V2 | The AI model focuses on diagnosis not detection. -Other types of rare liver tumors were not involved in the training set. |