Skip to main content
. 2024 Sep 2;29(4):e242443. doi: 10.1590/2177-6709.29.4.e242443.oar

Table 2: Comparison between the mean score of OPTION scale between patients/parents and clinicians regarding SDM.

QUESTION Score of OPTION scale Mean ± SD p r
Patients (n=90) Clinicians (n=90)
1. A health problem related to my teeth/face was identified, where it was made clear that a decision was needed 3.40±0.73 3.45±0.62 0.614 -0.054
2. More than one way to manage health problem was described 3.02±0.88 3.02±0.91 0.365 0.097
3. Different sources of information (e.g leaflets, websites, contact with other people) to help make the decisions were offered 2.42±1.20 2.34±1.18 0.031* 0.227
4. Different options (including the possibility of doing nothing) were discussed 2.73±1.07 2.61±1.04 0.032* 0.226
5. The advantages, disadvantages and possible outcomes of options were discussed 3.19±0.76 3.21±0.62 0.429 -0.084
6. Ideas or expectations about managing the health problem were discussed 2.92±0.96 3.09±0.69 0.492 -0.073
7. Concerns or worries about managing the health problem were discussed 2.91±0.93 3.08±0.70 0.007* 0.284
8. It was made sure that information had been understood 3.42±0.56 3.49±0.50 0.875 0.017
9. There were opportunities to ask questions 3.41±0.49 3.46±0.63 0.962 0.005
10. The preference to take part in the decision (or not) was respected 3.47±0.52 3.46±0.60 0.166 -0.147
11. During the consultation, a decision was made or there was an agreement to postpone making the decision 2.93±1.00 3.17±0.81 0.897 0.014
12. The possibility of coming back to the decision was discussed 3.13±0.73 3.14±0.66 0.785 0.029
Total score (48) 36.97±5.72 36.97±4.15 0.426 0.446

n = 90. Paired sample t-test. Pearson correlation.