Table 2: Comparison between the mean score of OPTION scale between patients/parents and clinicians regarding SDM.
| QUESTION | Score of OPTION scale Mean ± SD | p | r | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Patients (n=90) | Clinicians (n=90) | |||
| 1. A health problem related to my teeth/face was identified, where it was made clear that a decision was needed | 3.40±0.73 | 3.45±0.62 | 0.614 | -0.054 |
| 2. More than one way to manage health problem was described | 3.02±0.88 | 3.02±0.91 | 0.365 | 0.097 |
| 3. Different sources of information (e.g leaflets, websites, contact with other people) to help make the decisions were offered | 2.42±1.20 | 2.34±1.18 | 0.031* | 0.227 |
| 4. Different options (including the possibility of doing nothing) were discussed | 2.73±1.07 | 2.61±1.04 | 0.032* | 0.226 |
| 5. The advantages, disadvantages and possible outcomes of options were discussed | 3.19±0.76 | 3.21±0.62 | 0.429 | -0.084 |
| 6. Ideas or expectations about managing the health problem were discussed | 2.92±0.96 | 3.09±0.69 | 0.492 | -0.073 |
| 7. Concerns or worries about managing the health problem were discussed | 2.91±0.93 | 3.08±0.70 | 0.007* | 0.284 |
| 8. It was made sure that information had been understood | 3.42±0.56 | 3.49±0.50 | 0.875 | 0.017 |
| 9. There were opportunities to ask questions | 3.41±0.49 | 3.46±0.63 | 0.962 | 0.005 |
| 10. The preference to take part in the decision (or not) was respected | 3.47±0.52 | 3.46±0.60 | 0.166 | -0.147 |
| 11. During the consultation, a decision was made or there was an agreement to postpone making the decision | 2.93±1.00 | 3.17±0.81 | 0.897 | 0.014 |
| 12. The possibility of coming back to the decision was discussed | 3.13±0.73 | 3.14±0.66 | 0.785 | 0.029 |
| Total score (48) | 36.97±5.72 | 36.97±4.15 | 0.426 | 0.446 |
n = 90. Paired sample t-test. Pearson correlation.