Table 4: Comparison between the mean score of OPTION scale between patients/parents and clinicians regarding SDM in patients needing Conventional Orthodontics.
| QUESTION | Score of OPTION scale Mean±SD | p | r | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Patients (n=30) | Clinicians (n=30) | |||
| 1. A health problem related to my teeth/face was identified, where it was made clear that a decision was needed | 3.57±0.50 | 3.30±0.79 | 0.154 | 0.267 |
| 2. More than one way to manage health problem was described | 3.27±0.78 | 2.90±0.99 | 0.515 | 0.058 |
| 3. Different sources of information (e.g leaflets, websites, contact with other people) to help make the decisions were offered | 2.50±1.16 | 2.23±1.27 | 0.762 | 0.073 |
| 4. Different options (including the possibility of doing nothing) were discussed | 3.07±0.74 | 2.73±0.98 | 0.702 | 0.124 |
| 5. The advantages, disadvantages and possible outcomes of options were discussed | 3.37±0.55 | 3.07±0.52 | 0.014* | 0.445 |
| 6. Ideas or expectations about managing the health problem were discussed | 3.23±0.62 | 2.97±0.71 | 0.260 | 0.212 |
| 7. Concerns or worries about managing the health problem were discussed | 3.00±0.91 | 3.07±0.45 | 0.178 | 0.253 |
| 8. It was made sure that information had been understood | 3.57±0.67 | 3.47±0.50 | 0.972 | 0.007 |
| 9. There were opportunities to ask questions | 3.60±0.49 | 3.50±0.50 | 1.000 | 0.000 |
| 10. The preference to take part in the decision (or not) was respected | 3.67±0.47 | 3.37±0.61 | 0.411 | 0.156 |
| 11. During the consultation, a decision was made or there was an agreement to postpone making the decision | 3.30±0.70 | 3.17±0.69 | 0.353 | 0.176 |
| 12. The possibility of coming back to the decision was discussed | 3.37±0.49 | 3.10±0.66 | 0.538 | 0.117 |
| Total score (48) | 39.50±4.84 | 36.86±3.88 | 0.893 | 0.026 |
n=30. Paired sample t-test. Pearson correlation.