Skip to main content
. 2024 Sep 2;29(4):e242443. doi: 10.1590/2177-6709.29.4.e242443.oar

Table 4: Comparison between the mean score of OPTION scale between patients/parents and clinicians regarding SDM in patients needing Conventional Orthodontics.

QUESTION Score of OPTION scale Mean±SD p r
Patients (n=30) Clinicians (n=30)
1. A health problem related to my teeth/face was identified, where it was made clear that a decision was needed 3.57±0.50 3.30±0.79 0.154 0.267
2. More than one way to manage health problem was described 3.27±0.78 2.90±0.99 0.515 0.058
3. Different sources of information (e.g leaflets, websites, contact with other people) to help make the decisions were offered 2.50±1.16 2.23±1.27 0.762 0.073
4. Different options (including the possibility of doing nothing) were discussed 3.07±0.74 2.73±0.98 0.702 0.124
5. The advantages, disadvantages and possible outcomes of options were discussed 3.37±0.55 3.07±0.52 0.014* 0.445
6. Ideas or expectations about managing the health problem were discussed 3.23±0.62 2.97±0.71 0.260 0.212
7. Concerns or worries about managing the health problem were discussed 3.00±0.91 3.07±0.45 0.178 0.253
8. It was made sure that information had been understood 3.57±0.67 3.47±0.50 0.972 0.007
9. There were opportunities to ask questions 3.60±0.49 3.50±0.50 1.000 0.000
10. The preference to take part in the decision (or not) was respected 3.67±0.47 3.37±0.61 0.411 0.156
11. During the consultation, a decision was made or there was an agreement to postpone making the decision 3.30±0.70 3.17±0.69 0.353 0.176
12. The possibility of coming back to the decision was discussed 3.37±0.49 3.10±0.66 0.538 0.117
Total score (48) 39.50±4.84 36.86±3.88 0.893 0.026

n=30. Paired sample t-test. Pearson correlation.