Skip to main content
. 2024 Aug 3;16(8):e66078. doi: 10.7759/cureus.66078

Table 2. Program evaluation according to the Kirkpatrick model.

Evaluation Category Response p-value
Agree Disagree
The objectives were clearly defined for this program 29 1 <0.0001
The objectives were covered by facilitators 28 2 <0.0001
The materials were of the right level of complexity for my background 25 5 0.0002
I understood the learning objectives of the elective 30 0 -
I was able to relate the learning objectives to my learning experience 20 10 0.049
I faced appropriate challenges with the material 25 5 0.0002
The course materials of the elective module were well-organized 28 2 <0.0001
I found the module easy to navigate 23 7 0.0026
I felt that the lesson I learned would be essential for my success 29 1 <0.0001
The module was relevant to my needs 28 2 <0.0001
I will be immediately able to apply the knowledge that I have gained 2 28 <0.0001
The facilitators had a good understanding of the systematic review process 30 0 -
The facilitator shared his/ her experience regarding the conduction of a systematic review 30 0 -
My learning was enhanced by the knowledge and guidance of the facilitator 26 4 <0.0001
My learning was enhanced by the experiences on systematic review shared by the facilitator 25 5 0.0002
Overall (sum of 15 attributes/15) 37.8 7.2 -