Table 3.

Average adjusted probabilities in tele-EM use by race, ethnicity, and socioeconomic status for the entire study period.

	All individuals (Model 1)	All individuals (Model 2)	Individuals in communities with ADI<85 (Model 3)	Individuals in communities with ADI>=85 (Model 4)	Differences in probabilities between individuals in communities with ADI<85 versus >=85a
White individuals	23.5c	23.6 c	23.7 c	20.2 c	3.5 c
Black individuals	23.5 c	23.4 c	23.3 c	20.9 c	2.4 c
Hispanic individuals	23.9 c	23.7 c	23.4 c	25.8 c	−2.4 c
Differences in probabilities between Black and White individuals b	0.0	−0.2 d	−0.4 c	0.7 c
Differences in probabilities between Hispanic and White individuals b	0.4 c	0.1	−0.3 c	5.6 c

Numbers in the cell indicate percentage-points, which were calculated as probabilities x100. The average adjusted probabilities for each group of population were calculated using margins for the entire study period based on the models listed in Table 2. The average adjusted probabilities were estimated in STATA 16 using command margins.

^aThese differences were calculated as the differences in the average adjusted probabilities of tele-EM use between those in less deprived communities (i.e., zip-code-level areas) (based on Model 3) and those in deprived communities (based on Model 4), for each race and ethnicity.

^bThese differences are average marginal effects (AMEs) calculated for each model (Models1-4), which were the differences in the average adjusted probabilities of tele-EM use across race and ethnicity.

^cP<0.001.

^dP<0.01.