Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2025 Sep 1.
Published in final edited form as: Adv Healthc Mater. 2024 Apr 2;13(22):e2303706. doi: 10.1002/adhm.202303706

Figure 3. CPA concentration profiles within meniscal specimens using a μCT imaging-based simulation method.

Figure 3.

(A) Scanned transverse section (green area in the insert figure) at half thickness with the calibration curve for meniscal specimens equilibrated in different VS55 solutions (N=3, n=12 for samples equilibrated in 0% VS55; N=n=3 for other conditions). (B) Pseudocolor μCT images of meniscal tissues equilibrated in different concentrations of VS55 solutions. (C) A pseudocolor μCT image (left) alongside a computational image (right) of a 3.496 mm thick VS55-loaded sample. (D) Concentration profiles of the same VS55-loaded sample using both computational modeling and the μCT curve, with a best-fit diffusivity value of 4.6×10−10 m2/s (R2=0.9696). (E) Diffusivity values of VS55 at 0°C (N=3; n=9) and 22°C (N=3; n=6) with a two-sided t-test for significance. Data are mean±SD. Panels (F) and (G) depict VS55 distribution after loading samples of varying thicknesses and loading times at 0°C. Solid lines represent experimental conditions for viability assessment; dashed lines represent simulated conditions. (H) Representative validation of VS55 distribution in a 3.443 thick meniscal specimen after a 1-hour stepwise loading period (10 min each step) at 0°C using modeling (D=3.82×10−10 m2/s). N = number of independent menisci; n = number of specimens.