Table 2.

Regression analysis of the relationship between physical exercise and sense of social fairness.

Outcome	Predictor	R2	F	β	t	95% Boot CI
Sense of social fairness	Gender	0.078	10.330***	−4.412	−3.097***	[−7.212, −1.613]
	Age			0.917	1.163	[−0.631, 2.465]
	Grade			−3.383	−2.813***	[−5.746, −1.020]
	Physical exercise			0.151	3.971***	[0.076, 0.225]
Perceived social support	Gender	0.062	8.050***	−2.047	−1.961*	[−4.0.099, 0.004]
	Age			1.138	1.971**	[0.003, 2.273]
	Grade			−2.641	−2.996***	[−4.373, −0.909]
	Physical exercise			0.113	4.062***	[0.058, 0.167]
Life satisfaction	Gender	0.413	68.892***	0.841	1.962*	[−0.001, 1.684]
	Age			−0.077	−0.324	[−0.543, 0.389]
	Grade			0.313	0.861	[−0.402, 1.028]
	Physical exercise			0.004	0.387	[−0.018, 0.027]
	Perceived social support			0.333	18.047***	[0.297, 0.369]
Sense of social fairness	Gender	0.288	33.036***	−3.489	−2.761***	[−5.972, −1.006]
	Age			0.235	0.337	[−1.133, 1.603]
	Grade			−1.859	−1.739*	[−3.960, 0.241]
	Physical exercise			0.078	2.291**	[0.011, 0.144]
	Perceived social support			0.485	6.931***	[0.347, 0.622]
	Life satisfaction			0.431	3.247***	[0.170, 0.691]

N = 496. Boot confidence interval (CI) upper limit (ULCI), and boot CI lower limit (LLCI) are indicative of the standard deviation (SD) of the indirect effect evaluated through the deviation correction percentile Bootstrap approach and the upper and lower limits of the respective 95% confidence intervals (CIs). CI, confidence interval. *p < 0.1; **p < 0.05; ***p < 0.01.