Skip to main content
. 2024 Mar 8;47(9):2313–2323. doi: 10.1007/s40618-024-02324-3

Table 4.

Analysis of effect modification: adjusted hazard ratiosa and 95% confidence intervals (CI) for the development of type 2 diabetes according to quartiles of predicted serum vitamin D in the SUN cohort stratified by potential confounders (age, sex, and obesity)

N Incident T2D Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 p for interaction
Age 0.120
Age ≥ 50 years 3292 127 1.00 (reference) 0.63 (0.38–1.03) 0.78 (0.44–1.36) 0.70 (0.34–1.43)
Age < 50 years 15,302 82 1.00 (reference) 0.73 (0.40–1.34) 0.71 (0.34–1.50) 0.23 (0.06–0.85)
Sex 0.961
Women 11,256 49 1.00 (reference) 0.78 (0.33–1.85) 0.96 (0.35–2.62) 0.54 (0.13–2.20)
Men 7338 160 1.00 (reference) 0.57 (0.37–0.89) 0.63 (0.38–1.05) 0.45 (0.23–0.90)
Obesity 0.806
Obese 844 73 1.00 (reference) 0.77 (0.31–1.93) 1.69 (0.59–4.85) 0.94 (0.11–8.22)
Non-obese 17,750 136 1.00 (reference) 0.67 (0.43–1.03) 0.65 (0.39–1.08) 0.49 (0.25–0.95)

aAdjusted for sex, age, marital status, smoking status (current, former or never smoker), smoking pack-years, weight change, years of university, TV hours/day, family history of T2D, physical activity (MET-h/week), Trichopoulou’s 9-point score/Mediterranean dietary pattern, energy intake (kcal/day), sugar-sweetened beverage consumption (servings/day), snacking, following a special diet, prevalent hypertension, prevalent cancer, prevalent hypercholesterolemia, prevalent hypertriglyceridemia, obesity (kg/m2)