Skip to main content
. 2024 Jan 15;29(4):1309–1321. doi: 10.1007/s10459-023-10305-z

Table 3.

Linear or quadratic association of PRA, AA-Med and TFA scores adjusted between then with correct, wrong, and blank answers for Immunology and Microbiology examinations

Immunology Microbiology
β CI 95% Pr( >|t|) β CI 95% Pr( >|t|)
Outcome: correct answer
PRA 0.27 (− 0.21; 0.75) 0.27 − 0.03 (− 0.57; 0.51) 0.90
AA-Med 5.73 (1.52; 9.93) < 0.01 2.93 (− 2.12; 7.98) 0.25
AA-Med—squared − 0.15 (− 0.26; − 0.04) < 0.01 − 0.08 (− 0.20; 0.047) 0.22
TFA 0.25 (− 0.21; 0.71) 0.29 − 0.04 (− 0.59; 0.52) 0.90
Sex
 Female Ref Ref
 Male − 1.73 (− 6.69; 3.23) 0.49 − 0.87 (− 3.99; 2.26) 0.58
Course grade average 9.16 (7.34; 10.97) < 0.001 4.84 (2.74; 6.94) < 0.001
Admission grade − 1.33 (− 5.13; 2.46) 0.49 − 4.22 (− 8.08; − 0.36) 0.03
Age − 0.54 (− 2.64; 1.56) 0.61 − 0.23 (− 3.10; 2.64) 0.87
Outcome: wrong answer
PRA 0.19 (− 0.05; 0.44) 0.12 − 0.34 (− 0.78; 0.09) 0.12
AA-Med 1.18 (− 0.99; 3.36) 0.28 − 0.63 (− 1.21; − 0.04) 0.04
AA-Med—squared − 0.03 (− 0.09; 0.02) 0.25
TFA 0.12 (− 0.12; 0.36) 0.31 0.38 (− 0.07; 0.82) 0.10
Sex
 Female Ref Ref
 Male − 0.84 (− 3.40; 1.73) 0.52 0.71 (− 1.82; 3.23) 0.58
Course grade average − 1.75 (− 2.69; − 0.81) < 0.001 − 1.34 (− 3.04; 0.35) 0.12
Admission grade 0.39 (− 1.57; 2.36) 0.69 0.53 (− 2.59; 3.64) 0.74
Age 0.52 (− 0.57; 1.60) 0.35 0.80 (− 1.51; 3.10) 0.50
Outcome: blank answer
PRA − 0.46 ( − 1.08; 0.16) 0.14 0.39 (− 0.46; 1.25) 0.36
AA-Med − 6.91 (− 12.35; − 1.46) 0.01 0.83 (− 0.32; 1.98) 0.16
AA-Med—squared 0.18 (0.04; 0.32) < 0.01
TFA − 0.37 (− 0.96; 0.22) 0.22 − 0.40 (− 1.27; 0.48) 0.37
Sex
 Female Ref Ref
 Male 2.57 (− 3.85; 8.99) 0.43 0.20 (− 4.75; 5.15) 0.94
Course grade average − 7.40 (− 9.75; − 5.06) < 0.001 − 3.60 (− 6.92; − 0.28) 0.03
Admission grade 0.94 (− 3.98; 5.86) 0.71 3.57 (− 2.54; 9.67) 0.25
Age 0.02 (− 2.70; 2.75) 0.99 − 0.37 (− 4.89; 4.15) 0.87

Pearson risk attitude (PRA), Ambiguity aversion in medicine (AA-Med), and of tolerance for ambiguity (TFA), respectively

Items in bold reached statistical significance