Table 3.
Comparison of re-epithelialization rate between different study groups
| Group | Grade 0 N (%) |
Grade 1 N (%) |
Grade 2 N (%) |
Grade 3 N (%) |
Grade 4 N (%) |
Grade 5 N (%) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| A | 0 (0.0) | 0 (0.0) | 0 (0.0) | 0 (0.0) | 4 (33.3) | 8 (66.7) |
| B | 0 (0.0) | 2 (16.7) | 0 (0.0) | 3 (25.0) | 5 (41.7) | 2 (16.7) |
| C | 0 (0.0) | 0 (0.0) | 0 (0.0) | 3 (25.0) | 4 (33.3) | 5 (41.7) |
| D | 0 (0.0) | 0 (0.0) | 0 (0.0) | 1 (0.0) | 5 (41.7) | 6 (50.0) |
| E | 4 (33.3) | 0 (0.0) | 0 (0.0) | 3 (25.0) | 0 (0.0) | 5 (41.7) |
| F | 0 (0.0) | 0 (0.0) | 1 (8.3) | 1 (8.3) | 5 (41.7) | 5 (41.7) |
Grade 0: No re-epithelialization - Grade 1: Re-epithelialization at the edge of the wound – Grade 2: Re-epithelialization covering less than half of the wound – Grade 3: Re-epithelialization covering more than half of the wound – Grade 4: Re-epithelialization covering the entire wound, irregular thickness – Grade 5: Re-epithelialization covering the entire wound, normal, PMSE: Plantago major standardized extract-Group A: 5% PMSE nano emulsion-Group B:10% PMSE nano emulsion-Group C: 20% PMSE nano emulsion-Group D: nano emulsion without any PMSE- Group E: 5%PMSE - Group F: control