Table 4.
Comparison of the level of inflammation between different study groups
| Group | Grade 0 N (%) |
Grade 1 N (%) |
Grade 2 N (%) |
Grade 3 N (%) |
Grade 4 N (%) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| A | 10 (88.3) | 2 (16.7) | 0 (0.0) | 0 (0.0) | 0 (0.0) |
| B | 4 (33.3) | 7 (58.3 | 1 (8.3) | 0 (0.0) | 0 (0.0) |
| C | 7 (58.3) | 5 (41.7) | 0 (0.0) | 0 (0.0) | 0 (0.0) |
| D | 8 (66.7) | 2 (16.7) | 0 (0.0) | 2 (16.7) | 0 (0.0) |
| E | 4 (33.3) | 1 (8.3) | 3 (25.0) | 2 (16.7) | 2 (16.7) |
| F | 8 (66.7) | 1 (8.3) | 3 (25.0) | 0 (0.0) | 0 (0.0) |
Grade 0: No acute inflammation – Grade 1: Perivascular scattered acute inflammatory cells – Grade 2: Perivascular and submucosal scattered acute inflammatory cells – Grade 3: Submucosal band-like inflammatory infiltrate, less than 1/4 of one lower field – Grade 4: Submucosal band-like inflammatory infiltrate, between 1/4 and 1/2 of one lower area without tissue necrosis, PMSE: Plantago major standardized extract-Group A: 5% PMSE nano emulsion-Group B:10% PMSE nano emulsion-Group C: 20% PMSE nano emulsion-Group D: nano emulsion without any PMSE -Group E: 5%PMSE - Group F: control