Skip to main content
EFORT Open Reviews logoLink to EFORT Open Reviews
. 2024 Aug 1;9(8):817–826. doi: 10.1530/EOR-23-0139

Adverse effect of smoking on surgical site infection following ankle and calcaneal fracture fixation: a meta-analysis

Duy Nguyen Anh Tran 1,2, Bao Tu Thai Nguyen 1,2, Tan Thanh Nguyen 2, Yu-Pin Chen 3,4, Yi-Jie Kuo 3,4,
PMCID: PMC11370714  PMID: 39087505

Abstract

Purpose

  • Studies have reported conflicting findings on the relationship between smoking and surgical site infection (SSI) post fixation for ankle and calcaneal fractures. This meta-analysis explored the effect of smoking on SSI incidence following open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF) of these fractures.

Methods

  • Full-text studies on smoking’s influence on post-ORIF SSI rates for closed ankle and calcaneal fractures were sourced from the PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane databases, with no consideration given to language or publication date. Study quality was appraised using the Newcastle–Ottawa Scale. Odds ratios (OR) and the corresponding 95% CIs were determined using random-effects models. This meta-analysis adhered to the PRISMA guidelines and was registered with PROSPERO (CRD42023429372).

Results

  • The analysis incorporated data from 16 cohort and case–control studies, totaling 41 944 subjects, 9984 of whom were smokers, with 956 SSI cases. Results indicated smokers faced a higher SSI risk (OR: 1.62; 95% CI: 1.32–1.97, P < 0.0001) post ORIF, with low heterogeneity (I 2 = 26%). Smoking was identified as a significant deep SSI risk factor (OR: 2.09; 95% CI: 1.42–3.09; P = 0.0002; I 2 = 31%). However, the subgroup analysis revealed no association between smoking and superficial SSI (OR: 1.05; 95% CI: 0.82–1.33; P = 0.70; I 2 = 0%).

Conclusion

  • Smoking is associated with increased SSI risk after ORIF for closed ankle and calcaneus fractures. Although no clear link was found between superficial SSI and smoking, the data underscore the negative influence of smoking on deep SSI incidence.

Keywords: ankle fractures, calcaneal fractures, meta-analysis, smoking, surgical site infection

Introduction

Smoking, a widespread habit characterized by the inhalation of nicotine-rich tobacco smoke (1), has few proven benefits, such as stress reduction (2, 3), but multiple established adverse effects, including a detrimental impact on mental health (4, 5, 6, 7, 8). Smoking is associated with impaired wound healing and increased susceptibility to surgical site infections (SSIs) (9, 10, 11).

SSIs, occurring in 1–20% of patients after ankle and calcaneal fracture surgeries, result in substantial treatment costs and delayed treatment, potentially leading to severe complications, including amputation or mortality (12, 13, 14). Whereas open fractures, diabetes, and obesity are universally acknowledged risk factors (15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20), the contribution of smoking remains contentious, with conflicting evidence from several studies and meta-analyses (14, 21, 22, 23).

Previous meta-analyses have noted the detrimental influence of smoking on orthopedic and trauma outcomes, including increased fracture rates and delayed healing (24, 25, 26). However, these meta-analyses have overlooked the specific relation between smoking and SSI subcategories and have often failed to exclude open fractures, a significant confounder in wound infections post open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF) (27, 28, 29, 30).

Addressing this research gap, our comprehensive meta-analysis examines the effect of smoking on SSI incidence following ORIF for closed fractures of the ankle and calcaneus, utilizing a corpus of previously published data.

Methods

Study design and search strategy

In this meta-analysis, following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis (PRISMA) guidelines (31), investigators DNAT and TTN employed a comprehensive search strategy across PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane databases, Wiley Library online, and Google Scholar. Search terms included ‘smoking’, ‘cigarettes’, or ‘tobacco’ in conjunction with ‘ankle fracture’, ‘foot fracture’, or ‘calcaneus fracture’, and ‘infection’ or ‘SSI’. No time or language restrictions were applied, and studies published through April 2023 were candidates for inclusion. Screening of titles and abstracts was conducted independently by two investigators (YJK and YPC), with conflicts resolved by a third reviewer. Inclusion criteria required studies involving ankle and calcaneal fixation, which reported data on smoking and SSI, allowing calculation of the odds ratio (OR) and 95% CI (Fig. 1). The meta-analysis is registered with the International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews (CRD42023429372).

Figure 1.

Figure 1

PRISMA 2020 flow diagram for new systematic reviews incorporating database and register searches only.

Eligibility criteria

This study included studies with (1) a prospective or retrospective design, (2) a cohort or case–control methodology, (3) data on smoking status, and (4) data on SSI following ORIF for foot or ankle fractures.

Exclusion criteria included studies: (1) involving patients with open fractures, (2) lacking sufficient data for calculating OR and 95% CI in smokers and non-smokers, and (3) unavailable in full-text format.

Data extraction and management

Two reviewers (DNAT and BTTN) independently extracted data and metadata from the studies; specifically, they extracted data on study identifiers, study characteristics (e.g. design, criteria, follow-up duration, definitions of smoking and SSI), and participant demographics, frequency of smoking, and frequency of SSI.

The methodological quality of each study was assessed on the basis of the Newcastle–Ottawa Scale (NOS) (32). A third author (JYK) adjudicated any discrepancies between the assessments of the two authors. In the NOS, stars are given in three categories: (1) selection, 0–3 stars; (2) comparability, 0–2 stars; and (3) outcome (for cohort studies) or exposure (for case–control studies), 0–3 stars. Studies rated seven or more stars on the NOS were deemed to be of high quality (Supplementary Table 1, see section on supplementary materials given at the end of this article).

Definition of smoking

A subgroup analysis based on whether the individual is a current or former smoker was conducted for studies with explicit, consistent definitions of ‘current smoking’.

Definition of surgical site infection

Per the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) guidelines (33), superficial SSIs were identified as infections affecting the skin or subcutaneous tissue around the surgical incision within 30 days postoperatively. Deep SSIs were classified as infections affecting deeper fascial and muscle layers, appearing within 1 year after surgery.

Additional surgical procedures such as debridement were typically required for deep SSI management, whereas superficial SSIs were generally managed in a conservative manner (34).

Statistical analysis

We used ReviewManager 5.3 software to calculate the OR and 95% CI in analyses of dichotomous data related to smoking and infection status. Significance was indicated by P < 0.05. In addition, P < 0.1 in a Q test and I 2 > 50% indicated heterogeneity (35). All forest plots were constructed based on a random-effects model to account for potential variability. Funnel plots were used to visually examine potential publication bias, while Egger's test was used to determine small-study effects; P < 0.05 indicated significant publication bias. Meta-regression with Comprehensive Meta-Analysis 3.0 (CMA V3) was performed to identify confounders.

Results

Study identification

A thorough search across Embase (224 articles), PubMed (106 articles), Cochrane (20 articles), and additional resources (19 articles) yielded a total of 389 articles. We removed duplicates (95 articles), screened titles and abstracts (177 articles), and were not able to retrieve a few studies (8 articles). A detailed review resulted in the exclusion of 93 studies. Finally, 16 studies were included in our meta-analysis (Fig. 1).

Quality assessment

The NOS scores for the 16 included studies are presented in Supplementary Table 1. Of these, seven were rated as high quality (≥7 stars), and nine were rated as medium quality (4–6 stars).

Study characteristics

The meta-analysis included 16 studies, comprising ten cohorts and six case–control studies, totaling 41 944 patients, including 9984 patients who smoked and 956 patients with SSI. The mean age of participants ranged from 38.0 to 54.8 years, and 56.8% of all participants were women. Although some studies did not detail the ascertainment of smoking status, eight provided data on the number of ‘current smokers’ (13, 19, 36, 37, 38, 39, 40, 41). In addition, six studies conducted follow-up at a period of at least 1 year (13, 14, 36, 37, 42, 43), and eight studies adopted the CDC’s definition of SSI (13, 14, 36, 37, 44, 45). Further characteristics of the included studies are available in Table 1.

Table 1.

Characteristics of included studies.

Study Year Country Study design Follow-up Smoking status SSI definition Fracture Patients Smoker SSI
Total, n % Females
Jensen et al. (13) 2023 Denmark PS ≥1 year Current CDC Ankle 588 53.2 59 119
Sagherian et al. (12) 2022 USA RS 30 days Not clear Self-defining Ankle 33741 58.7 99 334
Shen et al. (14) 2022 China RS ≥1 year Not clear CDC Calcaneal 302 41.4 10 24
Zhao et al. (36) 2022 China RS ≥1 year Current CDC Ankle 378 55.6 21 70
Lu et al. (37) 2022 China RS ≥1 year Current CDC Calcaneal 1400 40.4 8 24
Sato et al. (44) 2021 Japan RS ≥6 months Not clear CDC Ankle 1201 42.6 23 69
Davey et al. (38) 2021 Ireland RS ≥6 months Current Self-defining Calcaneal 104 56.7 4 5
Braunstein et al. (42) 2020 Germany PS ≥1 year Not clear NI Ankle 32 56.3 1 2
Liu et al. (45) 2020 China RS ≥4 months Not clear CDC Ankle 1532 42.0 10 45
Abdelgaid et al. (43) 2018 Kuwait PS ≥34 months Not clear NI Ankle 47 61.7 1 3
Su et al. (40) 2017 China PS NI Current Self-defining Calcaneal 999 73.3 11 17
Olsen et al. (19) 2017 Denmark RS >30 days Current Self-defining Ankle 1043 58.7 21 64
Sun et al. (41) 2017 China RS NI Current CDC Ankle 1247 46 11 46
Naumann et al. (41) 2017 Norway RS NI Current Self-defining Ankle 567 56.8 10 29
Soni et al. (48) 2014 UK RS NI Not clear Self-defining Calcaneal 69 27.5 6 10
Schepers et al. (49) 2013 Netherlands RS ≥6 months Not clear CDC Ankle 101 60.4 4 14

CDC, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention; NI, no information; PS, prospective study; RS, retrospective study; SSI, surgical site infection.

Association of smoking and SSI

Our analysis, detailed in Fig. 2, encompasses 16 studies examining the relationship between smoking and post-ORIF SSI in closed ankle and calcaneal fractures. The non-smoking group had a lower risk of SSI; their ORs relative to the smoking group were 1.62 (95% CI: 1.32–1.97; P < 0.00001) for SSI, 1.53 (95% CI: 1.26–1.86; P < 0.0001) for ankle fractures, and 2.13 (95% CI: 1.14–3.97; P = 0.02) for calcaneal fractures. Low heterogeneity was observed among the 16 studies, reflected by a nonsignificant Cochran Q statistic (P = 0.16) and an I2 of 26%.

Figure 2.

Figure 2

Comparison of SSI rates between smoking and non-smoking groups after ORIF of ankle and calcaneal fractures (12, 13, 14, 19, 36, 37, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 43, 44, 45, 46, 47).

To account for discrepancies in smoking patterns, criteria used to define smoking, and in follow-up duration, we conducted a subgroup analysis where studies were distinguished according to one or some of these criteria. The findings are presented in Table 2 and Supplementary Figs. 1, 2, 3 and 4. Current smokers had an OR of 1.77 (95% CI: 1.25–2.51). The effect size was greater for studies with a follow-up period of 1 year or more (OR: 1.90; 95% CI: 1.41–2.57), relative to studies without, and studies adhering to the CDC’s definition of SSI (OR: 1.85; 95% CI: 1.47–2.33), relative to studies that did not. The three studies that met all these criteria had an OR of 2.13 (95% CI: 1.54–2.94), which was higher than that of the entire sample.

Table 2.

Association between smoking and SSI by subgroups of current smoking, follow-up duration, and CDC-defined SSI.

Studies included No. of reports OR (95% CI) P Heterogeneity
Q P I2, %
All studies 16 1.62 (1.32–1.97) 0.02 20.3 0.16 26
(1) Current smoking 8 1.77 (1.25–2.51) 0.002 13.95 0.05 50
(2) Follow-up ≥1 year 6 1.90 (1.41–2.57) <0.00001 3.92 0.56 0
(3) SSI following CDC 8 1.85 (1.47–2.33) <0.00001 7.05 0.42 1
(1) + (2) + (3) 3 2.13 (1.54–2.94) <0.00001 0.44 0.80 0

Association of smoking and superficial SSI

Figure 3 provides a summary of the meta-analysis regarding the influence of smoking on superficial SSI rates. The OR for the non-smoking group vs the smoking group was 1.05 (95% CI: 0.82–1.33; P = 0.70; I 2 = 0%). Among the studies, four that focused on ankle fractures had an OR of 1.04 (95% CI: 0.80–1.36; P = 0.38; I 2 = 2%), whereas two regarding calcaneal fractures had an OR of 1.02 (95% CI: 0.37–2.82; P = 0.97; I 2 = 0%). The smoking and non-smoking groups did not significantly differ with respect to superficial SSI rate (P > 0.05 in three forest plots).

Figure 3.

Figure 3

Comparison of superficial SSI rates between the smoking and non-smoking groups after ORIF of ankle and calcaneal fractures (12, 19, 40, 42, 43, 46).

Association of smoking and deep SSI

The influence of smoking on the risk of deep SSI was assessed through a meta-analysis of six studies. The results in Fig. 4 demonstrated a significantly elevated risk of deep SSI in smokers (OR: 2.09; 95% CI: 1.42–3.09; P = 0.0002). Notably, the influence of smoking was more pronounced in the calcaneal fracture group (OR: 2.89; 95% CI: 1.47–5.69; P = 0.002) than in the ankle fracture group (OR: 1.73; 95% CI: 1.07–2.79; P = 0.02).

Figure 4.

Figure 4

Comparison of deep SSI rates between the smoking and non-smoking groups after ORIF of ankle and calcaneal fractures (12, 19, 36, 37, 40, 46).

Publication bias

Publication bias was assessed using a funnel plot, as shown in Fig. 5, which plotted the logarithmic OR for smoking vs non-smoking against their respective standard errors. Visually, the funnel plot displayed symmetry. Further confirmation of the absence of publication bias was obtained through Egger’s test, which yielded a P-value of 0.53, supporting the lack of publication bias in our study.

Figure 5.

Figure 5

Funnel plot for the detection of publication bias.

Discussion

Deep infections following ORIF for fractures can lead to significant complications and potential treatment failure. Consequently, understanding and managing the associated risk factors for SSI is imperative. Our meta-analysis demonstrates that smoking significantly heightens the SSI risk in ORIF-treated ankle and calcaneal fractures, with an OR of 1.62 (95% CI: 1.32–1.97; P < 0.00001). Notably, the risk of deep SSI was found to be considerably higher than that of superficial SSI among smokers, with ORs of 2.09 (95% CI: 1.42–3.09; P = 0.0002) and 1.05 (95% CI: 0.82–1.33; P = 0.70), respectively.

Smoking has been shown to negatively affect SSIs by contributing to tissue ischemia and disrupted inflammatory processes (10, 11). A 2022 meta-analysis by Liu et al. involving 11 studies with 218 567 participants in total reported an association with non-smoking or smoking cessation with fewer postoperative wound healing complications (OR: 0.59; 95% CI: 0.43–0.82, P < 0.001) (48). However, for ORIF-treated ankle and calcaneal fractures, Shao et al. and Zhang et al. reported nonsignificant smoking effects on SSI rate with ORs of 1.63 (95% CI: 0.95–2.8; P > 0.05; I2 = 73.7%) and 1.79 (95% CI: 0.97–3.30; P > 0.05; I2 = 79.6%), respectively (22, 23). In contrast, our studies jointly demonstrated a substantial correlation of smoking with SSI in the ankle (OR: 1.53; 95% CI: 1.26–1.86; P < 0.0001; I2 = 21%) and calcaneal fractures (OR: 2.13; 95% CI: 1.14–3.97; P = 0.02; I2 = 36%) (Fig. 2). Our study’s specificity lies in its focus on smoking in the context of closed fractures and SSI, and we observed low heterogeneity among studies at 21% and 36% for ankle and calcaneal fracture groups, respectively. Our study distinguishes itself from previous works by focusing on smoking in the context of closed fractures and SSI. Zhang's study, though it had a specific definition of SSI, included studies in patients with open fractures. Shao’s analysis focused on patients with closed fractures but defined the outcome as ‘wound complications’, a broader definition than SSI.

Several studies highlight the varying effects of smoking cessation timing on postoperative wound healing. Kuri et al. found that patients who abstained from smoking for more than 3 weeks prior to surgery experienced less impaired wound healing (49). Cavichio et al. corroborated this finding in their 2014 meta-analysis, showing that stopping smoking at least 4 weeks before surgery reduced complications related to wound healing (50). Our meta-analysis included a single study with subgroups of smokers, ex-smokers (those who quit for 6 months or longer), and non-smokers (38). Of the 16 studies reviewed, eight identified current smokers, and eight did not specify smoking status. Despite differences in the definitions of smoking between the included studies, the meta-analysis of these nine studies still indicated an increased incidence of SSI in smokers (OR: 1.77; 95% CI: 1.25–2.51; P = 0.002; Supplementary Fig. 1).

The CDC issued SSI prevention guidelines in 1999; they defined a 30-day timeframe for superficial or deep SSI without implants and 1 year for those with implants (51). In 2016, the CDC amended these guidelines, reducing the post-discharge surveillance for deep infection with implants to 90 days for more efficient monitoring and prompt feedback (52, 53). This change, however, has sparked debate among orthopedists due to concerns that SSIs may be overlooked (53, 54). As such, many orthopedic researchers, including those in our review, adhere to the 1999 CDC definition of SSI. Subgroup analyses based on this definition (eight studies) and a 1-year follow-up period (six studies) demonstrated statistically significant OR greater than 1 when comparing non-smokers to smokers (P < 0.05) (Supplementary Figs. 2 and 3).

Although superficial SSIs are generally milder and can be effectively treated with antibiotics or physiotherapy (51, 54), they can lead to severe complications, including deep SSI, if left untreated (55, 56). In a meta-analysis by Xu et al. on 1059 patients with non-pathological fractures, no significant difference in superficial SSI rates was found between smokers and non-smokers (OR: 1.27; 95% CI: 0.73–2.21; P = 0.39, I2 = 0%) (57), consistent with our findings (OR: 1.05; 95% CI: 0.82–1.33; P = 0.70; I2 = 0%; Fig. 3). Nonetheless, larger-scale studies have reported a higher risk of superficial SSI in smokers, including those by Fan Chiang et al. (5 337 996 surgical cases) (58) and Turan et al. (635 265 patients) (59). Therefore, further investigation into the association between smoking and superficial SSI is warranted.

Sorensen and Xu’s meta-analyses have confirmed the negative effect of smoking on deep SSI, both reporting ORs of 1.79 (95% CI: 1.57–2.04; P < 0.001) (57, 60). Our study corroborated their findings, observing a higher risk of deep SSI in smokers undergoing ORIF for ankle and calcaneal fractures (OR: 2.09; 95% CI: 1.42–3.09; P = 0.0002; I2 = 31%; Fig. 4).

Smoking's potential to induce hypoxia and ischemia in fractured bones has led to speculation about its negative impact on the bone-healing process (61, 62). Recent meta-analyses have substantiated this concern, establishing smoking as a risk factor for delayed bone union and non-union (57, 63). While these findings are well-supported, it is noteworthy that research specifically addressing the influence of smoking on ankle fracture surgery is limited. As our finding, only one study of Matson in 2017 revealed that smoking patients exhibited a significantly higher incidence of delayed union compared to their non-smoking counterparts (P = 0.035) following closed ankle fractures treated with ORIF, while no statistically significant difference was observed in the mean time to union (64). Therefore, for a more comprehensive and in-depth understanding, further studies are required to evaluate bone healing in smoking patients following ORIF for ankle and calcaneal fractures.

Our study, however, has some limitations. The retrospective nature of the majority (14 out of 16) of the included studies could introduce biases, potentially affecting evidence quality. Additionally, heterogeneity in the definitions of smoking, SSI, and follow-up time necessitated subgroup analysis. Nevertheless, our study’s robustness is supported by consistent findings across subgroups, a low level of heterogeneity, and the absence of publication bias.

Conclusion

Our study provides strong evidence for the adverse effects of smoking on SSI. Despite a lack of evidence linking smoking to superficial SSI, a substantial correlation between smoking and increased deep SSI risk is evident. We, therefore, recommend for clinicians to adopt treatment strategies that are specific to patients who smoke, especially those undergoing ORIF surgeries for ankle and calcaneal fractures.

Supplementary Materials

Supplementary Figures
Supplementary Table S1 Results of methodological quality of the included studies based on Newcastle–Ottawa Scale (NOS).

ICMJE Conflict of Interest Statement

The authors declare that there is no conflict of interest that could be perceived as prejudicing the impartiality of the study reported.

Funding Statement

This work did not receive any specific grant from any funding agency in the public, commercial, or not-for-profit sector.

References

  • 1.Benowitz NL. Nicotine addiction. New England Journal of Medicine 20103622295–2303. ( 10.1056/NEJMra0809890) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Choi D Ota S & Watanuki S. Does cigarette smoking relieve stress? Evidence from the event-related potential (ERP). International Journal of Psychophysiology 201598470–476. ( 10.1016/j.ijpsycho.2015.10.005) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Parrott AC. Does cigarette smoking cause stress? American Psychologist 199954817–820. ( 10.1037//0003-066x.54.10.817) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Johnson JG Cohen P Pine DS Klein DF Kasen S & Brook JS. Association between cigarette smoking and anxiety disorders during adolescence and early adulthood. JAMA 20002842348–2351. ( 10.1001/jama.284.18.2348) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Isensee B Wittchen HU Stein MB Hofler M & Lieb R. Smoking increases the risk of panic: findings from a prospective community study. Archives of General Psychiatry 200360692–700. ( 10.1001/archpsyc.60.7.692) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Lawrence D Johnson SE Mitrou F Lawn S & Sawyer M. Tobacco smoking and mental disorders in Australian adolescents. Australian and New Zealand Journal of Psychiatry 202256164–177. ( 10.1177/00048674211009617) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.McDermott MS Marteau TM Hollands GJ Hankins M & Aveyard P. Change in anxiety following successful and unsuccessful attempts at smoking cessation: cohort study. British Journal of Psychiatry 201320262–67. ( 10.1192/bjp.bp.112.114389) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Larsson SC & Burgess S. Appraising the causal role of smoking in multiple diseases: a systematic review and meta-analysis of Mendelian randomization studies. EBiomedicine 202282104154. ( 10.1016/j.ebiom.2022.104154) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Yoong S Tursan d’Espaignet E Wiggers J St Claire S Mellin-Olsen J & Grady A. Tobacco and Postsurgical Outcomes: WHO Tobacco Knowledge Summaries. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2020. [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Gantwerker EA & Hom DB. Skin: histology and physiology of wound healing. Clinics in Plastic Surgery 20123985–97. ( 10.1016/j.cps.2011.09.005) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Hom DB & Davis ME. Reducing risks for poor surgical wound healing. Facial Plastic Surgery Clinics of North America 202331171–181. ( 10.1016/j.fsc.2023.01.002) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Sagherian BH Hoballah JJ & Tamim H. Comparing the 30-day complications between smokers and nonsmokers undergoing surgical fixation of ankle fractures. Foot and Ankle Orthopaedics 2022724730114221115677. ( 10.1177/24730114221115677) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Giver Jensen T Aqeel Khudhair Almadareb M Booth Nielsen M Jesper Hansen E & Lindberg-Larsen M. Outcome after treatment of distal fibula fractures using one-third tubular plate, locking compression plate or distal anatomical locking compression plate. Journal of Foot and Ankle Surgery 202362524–528. ( 10.1053/j.jfas.2022.12.008) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Shen L Wang Q Chen J & Jiang Z. Risk factor of postoperative incision infection after plate internal fixation of calcaneal fractures: a retrospective study. BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders 2022231091. ( 10.1186/s12891-022-06072-4) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Rascoe AS Kavanagh MD Audet MA Hu E & Vallier HA. Factors associating with surgical site infection following operative management of malleolar fractures at an urban level 1 trauma center. OTA International 20203e077. ( 10.1097/OI9.0000000000000077) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Aiyer A Hillam J Smyth N & Kaplan J. The influence of diabetes mellitus on ankle fracture treatment: a review of the national surgical quality improvement project (NSQIP). Foot and Ankle Orthopaedics 201832473011418S00138. ( 10.1177/2473011418S00138) [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Meng J Sun T Zhang F Qin S Li Y & Zhao H. Deep surgical site infection after ankle fractures treated by open reduction and internal fixation in adults: a retrospective case-control study. International Wound Journal 201815971–977. ( 10.1111/iwj.12957) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Ubillus HA Samsonov AP Azam MT Forney MP Jimenez Mosquea TR & Walls RJ. Implications of obesity in patients with foot and ankle pathology. World Journal of Orthopedics 202314294–301. ( 10.5312/wjo.v14.i5.294) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Olsen LL Møller AM Brorson S Hasselager RB & Sort R. The impact of lifestyle risk factors on the rate of infection after surgery for a fracture of the ankle. Bone and Joint Journal 201799–B225–230. ( 10.1302/0301-620X.99B2.BJJ-2016-0344.R1) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Ovaska MT Makinen TJ Madanat R Vahlberg T Hirvensalo E & Lindahl J. Predictors of poor outcomes following deep infection after internal fixation of ankle fractures. Injury 2013441002–1006. ( 10.1016/j.injury.2013.02.027) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Schade MA & Hollenbeak CS. Early postoperative infection following open reduction internal fixation repair of closed malleolar fractures. Foot and Ankle Specialist 201811335–341. ( 10.1177/1938640017735887) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Shao J Zhang H Yin B Li J Zhu Y & Zhang Y. Risk factors for surgical site infection following operative treatment of ankle fractures: a systematic review and meta-analysis. International Journal of Surgery 201856124–132. ( 10.1016/j.ijsu.2018.06.018) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Zhang W Chen E Xue D Yin H & Pan Z. Risk factors for wound complications of closed calcaneal fractures after surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Scandinavian Journal of Trauma, Resuscitation and Emergency Medicine 20152318. ( 10.1186/s13049-015-0092-4) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Smolle MA Leitner L Bohler N Seibert FJ Glehr M & Leithner A. Fracture, nonunion and postoperative infection risk in the smoking orthopaedic patient: a systematic review and meta-analysis. EFORT Open Reviews 202161006–1019. ( 10.1302/2058-5241.6.210058) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Xu Y Bao Y Wang M & Wu Q. Smoking and fracture risk in men: a meta-analysis of cohort studies, using both frequentist and Bayesian approaches. Scientific Reports 2022129270. ( 10.1038/s41598-022-13356-1) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Pearson RG Clement RG Edwards KL & Scammell BE. Do smokers have greater risk of delayed and non-union after fracture, osteotomy and arthrodesis? A systematic review with meta-analysis. BMJ Open 20166e010303. ( 10.1136/bmjopen-2015-010303) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Hu Q Zhao Y Sun B Qi W & Shi P. Surgical site infection following operative treatment of open fracture: incidence and prognostic risk factors. International Wound Journal 202017708–715. ( 10.1111/iwj.13330) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Zhu C Zhang J Li J Zhao K Meng H Zhu Y & Zhang Y. Incidence and predictors of surgical site infection after distal femur fractures treated by open reduction and internal fixation: a prospective single-center study. BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders 202122258. ( 10.1186/s12891-021-04132-9) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Audet MA Benedick A & Vallier HA. Tobacco smoking is associated with more pain and worse functional outcomes after torsional ankle fracture. OTA International 20225e175. ( 10.1097/OI9.0000000000000175) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Sun Y Wang H Tang Y Zhao H Qin S Xu L Xia Z & Zhang F. Incidence and risk factors for surgical site infection after open reduction and internal fixation of ankle fracture: a retrospective multicenter study. Medicine (Baltimore) 201897e9901. ( 10.1097/MD.0000000000009901) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Page MJ, McKenzie JE, Bossuyt PM, Boutron I, Hoffmann TC, Mulrow CD, Shamseer L, Tetzlaff JM, Akl EA, Brennan SE, et al. The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews. BMJ 2021372n71. ( 10.1136/bmj.n71) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Wells GA, Shea B, O’Connell D, Peterson J, Welch V, Losos M.et alThe Newcastle-Ottawa Scale (NOS) for Assessing the Quality of Nonrandomised Studies in Meta-Analyses. Oxford: 2000. Available at: https://www.ohri.ca/programs/clinical_epidemiology/oxford.asp [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Control CfD, Prevention. Chapter 9: surgical site infection (SSI) event. In National Healthcare Safety Network (NHSN) Patient Safety Component Manual. 2023. Available at: https://www.cdc.gov/nhsn/pdfs/pscmanual/pcsmanual_current.pdf [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Zabaglo M & Sharman T. Postoperative wound infection. StatPearls. Treasure Island (FL): StatPearls Publishing Copyright © 2023,Stat. Pearls Publishing LLC; 2023. [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Thorlund K Imberger G Johnston BC Walsh M Awad T Thabane L Gluud C Devereaux PJ & Wetterslev J. Evolution of heterogeneity (I2) estimates and their 95% confidence intervals in large meta-analyses. PLoS One 20127e39471. ( 10.1371/journal.pone.0039471) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Zhao H Meng J Sun T Wan Z Qin S Zhang F & Hou Z. Risk factors for deep surgical site infection following surgically treated peri-ankle fractures: a case-control study based on propensity score matching. Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Research 202217542. ( 10.1186/s13018-022-03436-3) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Lu K Ma T Yang C Qu Q & Liu H. Risk prediction model for deep surgical site infection (DSSI) following open reduction and internal fixation of displaced intra-articular calcaneal fracture. International Wound Journal 202219656–665. ( 10.1111/iwj.13663) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Davey MS Staunton P Lambert LA Davey MG & Walsh JC. Evaluating short-term outcomes post-intra-articular calcaneal fracture fixation via a sinus tarsi approach in a non-exclusively selected cohort. Journal of Foot and Ankle Surgery 202160302–306. ( 10.1053/j.jfas.2020.04.018) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Sun R Li M Wang X Li X Wu L Chen Z & Chen K. Surgical site infection following open reduction and internal fixation of a closed ankle fractures: a retrospective multicenter cohort study. International Journal of Surgery 20174886–91. ( 10.1016/j.ijsu.2017.10.002) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Su J & Cao X. Risk factors of wound infection after open reduction and internal fixation of calcaneal fractures. Medicine (Baltimore) 201796e8411. ( 10.1097/MD.0000000000008411) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Naumann MG Sigurdsen U Utvåg SE & Stavem K. Functional outcomes following surgical-site infections after operative fixation of closed ankle fractures. Foot and Ankle Surgery 201723311–316. ( 10.1016/j.fas.2016.10.002) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Braunstein M Baumbach SF Urresti-Gundlach M Borgmann L Bocker W & Polzer H. Arthroscopically assisted treatment of complex ankle fractures: intra-articular findings and 1-year follow-up. Journal of Foot and Ankle Surgery 2020599–15. ( 10.1053/j.jfas.2019.05.003) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Abdelgaid SM Moursy AF Elgebaly EAA & Aboelenien AM. Minimally invasive treatment of ankle fractures in patients at high risk of soft tissue wound healing complications. Journal of Foot and Ankle Surgery 201857557–571. ( 10.1053/j.jfas.2017.11.041) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Sato T Takegami Y Sugino T Bando K Fujita T & Imagama S. Smoking and trimalleolar fractures are risk factors for infection after open reduction and internal fixation of closed ankle fractures: a multicenter retrospective study of 1,201 fractures. Injury 2021521959–1963. ( 10.1016/j.injury.2021.04.017) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Liu D Zhu Y Chen W Li M Liu S & Zhang Y. Multiple preoperative biomarkers are associated with incidence of surgical site infection following surgeries of ankle fractures. International Wound Journal 202017842–850. ( 10.1111/iwj.13351) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Soni A, Vollans S, Malhotra K, Mann C.Association Between Smoking and Wound Infection Rates Following Calcaneal Fracture Fixation. Foot & Ankle Specialist 20147266–270. ( 10.1177/1938640014537301) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Schepers T, De Vries MR, Van Lieshout EM, Van der Elst M.The timing of ankle fracture surgery and the effect on infectious complications; a case series and systematic review of the literature. International Orthopaedics 201337489–494. ( 10.1007/s00264-012-1753-9) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Liu D Zhu L & Yang C. The effect of preoperative smoking and smoke cessation on wound healing and infection in post-surgery subjects: a meta-analysis. International Wound Journal 2022192101–2106. ( 10.1111/iwj.13815) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49.Kuri M Nakagawa M Tanaka H Hasuo S & Kishi Y. Determination of the duration of preoperative smoking cessation to improve wound healing after head and neck surgery. Anesthesiology 2005102892–896. ( 10.1097/00000542-200505000-00005) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 50.Cavichio BV Pompeo DA Oller GASAO & Rossi LA. Duration of smoking cessation for the prevention of surgical wound healing complications. Revista da Escola de Enfermagem da U S P 201448174–180. ( 10.1590/s0080-623420140000100022) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 51.Mangram AJ Horan TC Pearson ML Silver LC & Jarvis WR. Guideline for prevention of surgical site infection, 1999. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) hospital infection control practices advisory committee. American Journal of Infection Control 19992797–132; quiz 3–4; discussion 96. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 52.Berrios-Torres SI, Umscheid CA, Bratzler DW, Leas B, Stone EC, Kelz RR, Reinke CE, Morgan S, Solomkin JS, Mazuski JE, et al. Centers for disease control and prevention guideline for the prevention of surgical site infection, 2017. JAMA Surgery 2017152784–791. ( 10.1001/jamasurg.2017.0904) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 53.Global Guidelines for the Prevention of Surgical Site Infection. World Health Organization. Available at: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK536404/ [Google Scholar]
  • 54.Wise BT Connelly D Rocca M Mascarenhas D Huang Y Maceroli MA Joshi M Castillo RC & O’Toole RV. Are deep infections that present before and after 90 days from orthopaedic trauma different? An analysis of the validity of the recent change in CDC criteria for infections. Injury 202253912–918. ( 10.1016/j.injury.2021.10.020) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 55.Eriksson HK & Lazarinis S. Patient-related factors associated with superficial surgical site infection and progression to a periprosthetic joint infection after elective primary total joint arthroplasty: a single-centre, retrospective study in Sweden. BMJ Open 202212e060754. ( 10.1136/bmjopen-2022-060754) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 56.Carroll K Dowsey M Choong P & Peel T. Risk factors for superficial wound complications in hip and knee arthroplasty. Clinical Microbiology and Infection 201420130–135. ( 10.1111/1469-0691.12209) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 57.Xu B Anderson DB Park ES Chen L & Lee JH. The influence of smoking and alcohol on bone healing: systematic review and meta-analysis of non-pathological fractures. EClinicalmedicine 202142101179. ( 10.1016/j.eclinm.2021.101179) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 58.Fan Chiang YH Lee YW Lam F Liao CC Chang CC & Lin CS. Smoking increases the risk of postoperative wound complications: a propensity score-matched cohort study. International Wound Journal 202320391–402. ( 10.1111/iwj.13887) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 59.Turan A Mascha EJ Roberman D Turner PL You J Kurz A Sessler DI & Saager L. Smoking and perioperative outcomes. Anesthesiology 2011114837–846. ( 10.1097/ALN.0b013e318210f560) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 60.Sorensen LT. Wound healing and infection in surgery. The clinical impact of smoking and smoking cessation: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Archives of Surgery 2012147373–383. ( 10.1001/archsurg.2012.5) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 61.Hernigou J & Schuind F. Tobacco and bone fractures: a review of the facts and issues that every orthopaedic surgeon should know. Bone and Joint Research 20198255–265. ( 10.1302/2046-3758.86.BJR-2018-0344.R1) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 62.Sloan A Hussain I Maqsood M Eremin O & El-Sheemy M. The effects of smoking on fracture healing. Surgeon 20108111–116. ( 10.1016/j.surge.2009.10.014) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 63.Kim RG An VVG & Petchell JF. Fibular fixation in mid and distal extra-articular tibia fractures - A systematic review and meta-analysis. Foot and Ankle Surgery 202228809–816. ( 10.1016/j.fas.2021.11.007) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 64.Matson AP Hamid KS & Adams SB. Predictors of time to union after operative fixation of closed ankle fractures. Foot and Ankle Specialist 201710308–314. ( 10.1177/1938640016677813) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Supplementary Figures
Supplementary Table S1 Results of methodological quality of the included studies based on Newcastle–Ottawa Scale (NOS).

Articles from EFORT Open Reviews are provided here courtesy of Bioscientifica Ltd.

RESOURCES