Skip to main content
. 2013 Oct 6;2013(10):CD007796. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD007796.pub3

Hao 2010.

Methods RCT
No estimation of sample size
Participants 112 participants were randomised into intervention group (n = 60, M/F 38/22, mean age 51.6 ± 3.7 years), and control group (n = 52, M/F 30/22, mean age 50.4 ± 7.1 years).
Type of DM: not reported 
Study location: China
Study setting: outpatients
Diagnostic criteria: World Health Organization 1999 criteria
Inclusion criteria: meeting DM diagnosis criteria; having DPN symptoms; peripheral nerve damage
Exclusion criteria: with other diabetic complications; DPN due to other diseases.
Interventions (1) Intervention: Xuesaitong tablet and mecobalamin. The main components of Xuesaitong capsule were total saponins of panax notoginseng (the exact amount was not reported). Xuesaitong 50 mg, taken 3 times a day and 0.5 mg mecobalamin orally 3 times per day. Treatment lasted for 3 months
(2) Control: 0.5 mg mecobalamin orally 3 times per day. Treatment lasted for 3 months
Participants in both the intervention group and control group received hypoglycaemic therapy, which included oral hypoglycaemic drug, insulin, exercise
Outcomes Global symptom improvement
Change of motor nerve conduction velocity in tibial nerve (m/s)
Change of sensory nerve conduction velocity in tibial nerve (m/s)
Change of motor nerve conduction velocity in common peroneal nerve (m/s)
Change of sensory nerve conduction velocity in common peroneal nerve (m/s)
Adverse events: not reported
Notes Sources of funding not stated
Risk of bias
Bias Authors' judgement Support for judgement
Random sequence generation (selection bias) Unclear risk Random number table was used to generate the allocation sequence, but insufficient information was provided to judge whether or not it was conducted properly
Allocation concealment (selection bias) High risk Not mentioned in the report
Blinding (performance bias and detection bias) 
 All outcomes High risk No blinding of participants or investigators
Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias) 
 All outcomes High risk Not mentioned in the report
Selective reporting (reporting bias) Unclear risk Unclear as the trial protocol was not accessible
Other bias Low risk No evidence of other bias