Skip to main content
. 2024 Sep 4;20(9):20240202. doi: 10.1098/rsbl.2024.0202

Table 2.

Linear regression models for the effects of lighting treatment, sex and their interaction on the first three principal components explaining variation in central nervous system volumes.

predictors estimate ± s.e. statistic p‐value
(a) PC1: secondary visual pathway and rest of central nervous system
 lighting treatment −0.33 ± 0.60 F 1,25 = 0.02 0.89
 sex −1.46 ± 0.79 F 1,25 = 3.45 0.08
 lighting × sex 0.85 ± 1.08 F 1,25 = 0.63 0.44
(b) PC2: primary eyes visual pathway
 lighting treatment −1.30 ± 0.40 F 1,25 = 10.07 0.004
 sex 0.59 ± 0.53 F 1,25 = 8.05 0.009
 lighting × sex 0.80 ± 0.72 F 1,25 = 1.23 0.28
(c) PC3: male-biased (AB+MB) versus female-based (AM2) structures
 lighting treatment 0.10 ± 0.42 F 1,25 = 0.23 0.63
 sex 1.18 ± 0.56 F 1,25 = 11.63 0.002
 lighting × sex 0.21 ± 0.76 F 1,25 = 0.08 0.78