Skip to main content
. 2024 Sep 4;14:20534. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-70784-x

Table 2.

Optimal posology results—Adolescents group (12–17 years); 5% target trough level with 10% control trough level.

Parameter rIX-FP rFIX rFIXFc
WP
rFIXFc
IP
rFIXFc*
WP and IP
N9-GP

Steady-state FIX trough levels, IU/dL

Median (IQR)

7.7

(6.0–9.0)

2.6

(1.5–4.2)

4.4

(3.4–5.0)

3.9

(2.9–5.0)

4.2

(3.3–5.0)

5.1

(5.1–5.2)

Patients below target, % 1.2 83.0 63.8 75.3 67.3 0.0

Dose (IU/kg per week)

Median (IQR)

35.0

(25.0–35.0)

182.0

(182.0–182.0)

88.0

(79.4–88.0)

87.5

(87.5–87.5)

87.5

(84.5–88.0)

12.5

(10.0–15.5)

Patients among dose-intervals, %
 ≤ 7 days 47.4 100 100.0 0.0 68.8 100.0
8–10 days 16.7 0.0 0.0 98.6 30.9 0.0
11–14 days 35.9 0.0 0.0 1.4 0.4 0.0
15–21 days 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0

Ratio between weekly dose (IU/kg) FIX product and rIX-FP

Median (IQR)

-

5.2

(5.2–7.3)

2.5

(2.4–3.3)

2.5

(2.5–3.5)

2.5

(2.5–3.5)

0.4

(0.3–0.5)

*Patients were randomly assigned to individualized interval prophylaxis from a Bernoulli distribution with a probability 0.315, based on data from clinical trial 998HB102 (NCT01027364). In the simulations underlying the results of this table, 68.8% of the simulated patients were assigned to receive weekly prophylaxis and 31.3% to individualized interval prophylaxis. †Percentages may not sum to 100 due to rounding.

FIX, factor IX; IP, individualized interval prophylaxis; IQR, interquartile range; IU, international units; WP, weekly prophylaxis.