Table 9.
The details of implementing bias mitigation for the neural network model using stochastic gradient descent after matching.
| Sociodemographic conditions | Optimal threshold | Recall | Specificity | Accuracy | Differencea | |
| Sex | 52.10 |
|
|
|
1.88 b | |
|
|
Male |
|
50.00 | 97.85 | 97.65 |
|
|
|
Female |
|
51.85 | 97.88 | 97.49 |
|
| Marital status | 5.80 |
|
|
|
0.07 | |
|
|
Never been married |
|
100.00 | 50.26 | 50.51 |
|
|
|
Other groups of marital status |
|
100.00 | 50.33 | 50.69 |
|
| Working condition | 12.50 |
|
|
|
5.12 | |
|
|
Working ≥35 hours |
|
88.89 | 89.27 | 89.27 |
|
|
|
Other groups of working condition |
|
87.50 | 85.54 | 85.56 |
|
| Race | 8.10 |
|
|
|
0.03 | |
|
|
White |
|
100.00 | 73.39 | 73.56 |
|
|
|
Black |
|
100.00 | 73.42 | 73.55 |
|
| Income | 52.60 |
|
|
|
3.07 | |
|
|
An income of <US $20,000 |
|
50.00 | 96.96 | 96.74 |
|
|
|
Other groups of income |
|
51.61 | 98.42 | 98.09 |
|
aDifference between recall and specificity after bias mitigation.
bItalicized values indicate an improvement compared with the initial values (50% threshold).