Skip to main content
. 2024 Aug 22;15:1395636. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1395636

Table 1.

Participant characteristics by subgroup.

Adults with V.I. Practitioners
n 17 5
Age1 U = 11.5, p = 0.019
M (SD) 59.1 (12.2) 47.0 (8.6)
Range 24–75 35–57
Gender Fisher’s exact p = 0.699
Female 35.3% (6) 60.0% (3)
Male 58.8% (10) 40.0% (2)
N/A 5.9% (1)
Ethnicity Fisher’s exact p = 0.210
White British 88.2% (15) 60.0% (3)
Pakistani 5.9% (1)
Indian 5.9% (1)
White Scottish 20.0% (1)
Prefer not to say 20.0% (1)
Education U = 52.5, p = 0.446
No formal qualifications 5.9% (1)
GCSE/O-Level 5.9% (1)
A-level/advanced highers 1.8% (2)
Apprenticeship, vocational qualification, NVQ, or HND 23.5% (4) 20.0% (1)
Undergraduate degree 29.4% (5) 60.0% (3)
Masters, PhD 23.5% (4) 20.0% (1)
Employment status Fisher’s exact p = 0.102
In paid employment 23.5% (4) 100.0% (5)
Self-employed 5.9% (1)
Unemployed 11.8% (2)
Retired 47.1% (8)
Long-term sick or disabled 5.9% (1)
Doing voluntary work 5.9% (1)
Marital status Fisher’s exact p = 0.724
Married or in a civil partnership 47.1% (8) 80.0% (4)
Divorced 29.4% (5) 20.0% (1)
Never married or registered a civil partnership 17.6% (3)
Prefer not to say 5.9% (1)
Relationship status2 n = 9 n = 1
Living with a partner 11.1% (1)
In a relationship but not living with a partner 11.1% (1) 100.0% (1)
Not currently in a relationship 66.7% (6)
Prefer not to say 11.1% (1)
Registration status2 n = 1
Registered severely sight impaired/blind 94.1% (16) 100.0% (1)
Registered sight impaired/partially sighted 5.9% (1)
V.I. onset2 n = 1
Born with V.I. 29.4% (5) 100.0% (1)
Before the age of 4 5.9% (1)
Between the ages of 4 and 12 5.9% (1)
Between the ages of 12 and 18
After the age of 18 52.9% (9)
Do not know 5.9% (1)

1Two participants preferred to give their age as an age range (40–50). 2Comparative analysis was not conducted due to small subsample size in the practitioner group (n = 1).