Skip to main content
. 2024 Aug 27;31(4):174–184. doi: 10.21315/mjms2024.31.4.14

Table 3.

Results of Wingate AC in sedentary (control), wushu and taekwondo groups

Sedentary control group (n = 10) Wushu group (n = 10) Taekwondo group (n = 10) Difference in mean and 95% Confidence interval

Sedentary (control) versus wushu Sedentary (control) versus taekwondo Wushu versus taekwondo
MP (Watt) 266.3 (79.6) 472.3 (77.9) * 335.6 (108.7) ## −205.93 (−308.49, −103.37) −69.23 (−171.79, 33.33) 136.7 (34.14, 239.26)
PP (Watt) 433.0 (65.8) 606.8 (114.0) ** 514.9 (151.2) −173.80 (−305.95, −41.65) −81.90 (−214.05, 50.25) 91.90 (−40.25, 224.05)
AC (Watt.kg−1) 5.8 (1.3) 8.8 (1.0) * 5.4 (1.3) # −3.04 (−4.42, −1.66) 0.38 (−1.01, 1.76) 3.42 (2.04, 4.80)
AP (Watt.kg−1) 9.6 (1.1) 11.4 (2.0) 8.4 (2.1) ## −1.81 (−3.80, 0.18) 1.14 (−0.81, 3.13) 2.95 (0.96, 4.94)
FI (Watt.sec−1) 11.9 (4.1) 13.1 (4.4) 14.7 (8.1) −1.24 (−7.87, 5.39) −2.85 (−9.48, 3.78) −1.61 (−8.24, 5.02)

Notes: Values are expressed as mean (SD);

*

P < 0.05,

**

P < 0.01 = statistically significant different from sedentary control group;

#

P < 0.05,

##

P < 0.01 = statistically significant different from wushu group;

MP = mean power; PP = peak power; AC = anaerobic capacity; AP = anaerobic power; FI = fatigue index