Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2024 Sep 6.
Published in final edited form as: J Adolesc. 2011 Oct 19;35(3):549–560. doi: 10.1016/j.adolescence.2011.09.006

Table 3.

Multiple Regression Models with Family Communication Predicting Adolescents’ Social Trust

Model 1: Adolescent Concurrent Reports Model 2: Mother Concurrent Reports Model 3: Adolescent Lagged Reports
Intercept 1.89*** 1.44*** 1.43***

Control Variables
Age −.02 −.01 −.02
Gender (Male=1, Female=0) .14** .11* .12*
Race: Black .02 −.02 −.02
 Hispanic −.10 −.15 −.14
 Other −.16 −.25 −.23
Mothers’ Education −.06* −.05 −.04
Trusted Friendship −.03 .001 −.01
Positive Neighborhood Clim. .13*** .18*** .17***

Social Trust
Adolescents’ STa T1 .24*** .27*** .27***
Mothers’ STa T2 .13** .12* .14**

Family Communication
Compassion Messages .30*** .13 .10
Caution Messages −.09 −.09 −.03
Democratic Parenting .12*** .05 −.02

R2 Total .26 .20 .21

Note. N = 1150. Unstandardized betas reported. Pooled estimates across multiply imputed datasets are shown.

p ≤ .10,

*

p ≤ .05,

**

p ≤ .01,

***

p ≤ .001.

a

ST = Social Trust.