Table 3.

Paired differences in social value scores and relationship quality scores (exploratory sample)

Comparison (Subsample)	Social value	Relationship quality
Parent–Friend (Sona-1)	-0.43 [-0.73, -0.15]	-0.70 [-1.04, -0.38]
Parent–Acquaintance (Sona-1)	0.48 [0.18, 0.77]	0.67 [0.35, 0.98]
Friend–Acquaintance (Sona-1)	0.70 [0.38, 1.03]	1.39 [0.94, 1.80]
Parent–Friend (Sona-2)	-0.17 [-0.47, 0.15]	-0.62 [-1.00, -0.26]
Parent–Acquaintance (Sona-2)	0.68 [0.30, 1.03]	0.22 [-0.10, 0.52]
Friend–Acquaintance (Sona-2)	0.73 [0.36, 1.10]	1.36 [0.93, 1.84]
Parent–Friend (Sona-3)	-0.14 [-0.31, 0.02]	-0.78 [-0.98, -0.57]
Parent–Acquaintance (Sona-3)	0.83 [0.61, 1.05]	0.64 [0.43, 0.84]
Friend–Acquaintance (Sona-3)	1.06 [0.84, 1.32]	1.49 [1.22, 1.74]
Parent–Friend (MTurk-1)	0.08 [-0.11, 0.25]	-0.51 [-0.70, -0.32]
Parent–Acquaintance (MTurk-1)	0.42 [0.21, 0.60]	0.18 [0.01, 0.37]
Friend–Acquaintance (MTurk-1)	0.37 [0.17, 0.55]	0.85 [0.64, 1.07]
Parent–Friend (MTurk-2)	0.01 [-0.18, 0.21]	-0.48 [-0.68, -0.28]
Parent–Acquaintance (MTurk-2)	0.41 [0.20, 0.63]	0.07 [-0.12, 0.28]
Friend–Acquaintance (MTurk-2)	0.36 [0.16, 0.55]	0.76 [0.55, 0.99]

Note. Brackets represent 89% HDIs of posterior probability distributions. Subsamples are listed in parentheses; ‘Sona’ or ‘MTurk’ reflect where the sample completing the likelihood ratings was recruited from. Sona-2 was administered MTurk-sourced activities; MTurk-2 was administered Sona-sourced activities. All other samples were administered activities sourced from a different sample within the same population. ‘Relationship Quality’ refers to mean scores from the IPPA.