Skip to main content
. 2024 Sep 6;2:84. doi: 10.1038/s44271-024-00132-2

Table 5.

Correlations between social value scores and relationship quality and social loss aversion, respectively (confirmatory sample)

Social value of partner (Subsample) Relationship quality Social loss aversion
Parent (Sona_MTurk) 0.26 [0.09, 0.42] 0.23 [0.04, 0.39]
Friend (Sona_MTurk) 0.44 [0.30, 0.60] 0.24 [0.05, 0.41]
Acquaintance (Sona_MTurk) 0.23 [0.05, 0.40] 0.09 [-0.08, 0.27]
Parent (MTurk_MTurk) 0.17 [0.02, 0.34] 0.22 [0.07, 0.38]
Friend (MTurk_MTurk) 0.22 [0.06, 0.39] 0.26 [0.09, 0.41]
Acquaintance (MTurk_MTurk) 0.16 [-0.00, 0.32] 0.28 [0.13, 0.44]
Parent (Sona_Prolific) 0.19 [0.09, 0.29] 0.15 [0.03, 0.26]
Friend (Sona_Prolific) 0.28 [0.19, 0.39] 0.17 [0.06, 0.28]
Acquaintance (Sona_Prolific) 0.37 [0.27, 0.47] 0.34 [0.24, 0.43]
Parent (MTurk_Prolific) 0.06 [-0.05, 0.17] 0.15 [0.03, 0.26]
Friend (MTurk_Prolific) 0.09 [-0.02, 0.20] 0.15 [0.04, 0.26]
Acquaintance (MTurk_Prolific) 0.18 [0.06, 0.28] 0.24 [0.13, 0.34]

Note. Brackets represent 89% HDIs of posterior probability distributions. Subsamples are listed in parentheses; the first term denotes the population from which the activities were sourced; the second term denotes which population completed the likelihood ratings and other measures. ‘Relationship Quality’ refers to mean scores from the IPPA scale. ‘Social Loss Aversion’ refers to scores on the one-item measure of how upset a participant would feel if they could no longer spend time with a given social partner.