Hu 2002.
Methods |
|
|
Participants |
|
|
Interventions | Treatment group
Control group
|
|
Outcomes |
|
|
Notes |
|
|
Risk of bias | ||
Bias | Authors' judgement | Support for judgement |
Random sequence generation (selection bias) | Low risk | We interviewed the author by telephone, they used simple randomisation. |
Allocation concealment (selection bias) | High risk | The random number table was produced by themselves. Investigator knew the intervention group before eligible participants entered in the study. |
Blinding of participants and personnel (performance bias) All outcomes | High risk | Blinding was not used in the study. |
Blinding of outcome assessment (detection bias) All outcomes | Unclear risk | NS |
Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias) All outcomes | Low risk | The data for all 38 patients were reported. |
Selective reporting (reporting bias) | Low risk | All clinically relevant and reasonably expected outcomes were reported. |
Other bias | Unclear risk | The study did not show any interest. |