Abstract
Background
Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) vaccines are pivotal in combating coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19); however, the declining antibody titers postvaccination pose challenges for sustained protection and herd immunity. Although gut microbiome is reported to affect the early antibody response after vaccination, its impact on the longevity of vaccine-induced antibodies remains unexplored.
Methods
A prospective cohort study was conducted involving 44 healthy adults who received two doses of either the BNT162b2 or ChAdOx1 vaccine, followed by a BNT162b2 booster at six months. The gut microbiome was serially analyzed using 16S rRNA and shotgun sequencing, while humoral immune response was assessed using a SARS-CoV-2 spike protein immunoassay.
Results
Faecalibacterium prausnitzii was associated with robust and persistent antibody responses post-BNT162b2 vaccination. In comparison, Escherichia coli was associated with a slower antibody decay following ChAdOx1 vaccination. The booster immune response was correlated with metabolic pathways involving cellular functions and aromatic amino acid synthesis.
Conclusions
The findings of this study underscored the potential interaction between the gut microbiome and the longevity/boosting effect of antibodies following vaccination against SARS-CoV-2. The identification of specific microbial associations suggests the prospect of microbiome-based strategies for enhancing vaccine efficacy.
Supplementary Information
The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12967-024-05637-2.
Keywords: Gut Microbiome, Vaccination, SARS-CoV-2, Half-life, Immunogenicity
introduction
The global response to the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic has resulted in the development of new platform vaccines, including adenovirus vector, protein subunit, and mRNA vaccines, targeting severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2). Although variable by vaccine platforms, SARS-CoV-2 vaccines elicited a robust antibody response, reaching peak titers at approximately 3–4 weeks after the second dose [1–4]. However, the antibody titers gradually decline over time, reaching levels similar to those of the initial immune response after approximately 6 months [5].
Post-vaccination antibody longevity plays a critical role in sustaining individual protection and establishing herd immunity. Long-lived plasma cells originating from naïve or memory B-cells are important for maintaining antibody longevity, with memory B-cells further enabling the quick and efficient response of the immune system when re-exposed to the relevant viral strains [6–8]. Recent studies have suggested a relatively consistent presence of SARS-CoV-2 vaccine-induced memory B cells for a 3–6 month period after vaccination, but their levels may vary among individuals [9, 10].
Immune responses following vaccination vary among individuals owing to the influence of several factors [11, 12], including the gut microbiota. The microbiota plays a central role in the host immune system, particularly in the training and maturation of key components of the adaptive immune system [13, 14]. First, gut microbes stimulate and shape the adaptive immune system through exposure to their bacterial components and active metabolites [15]. Second, the gut microbiota directly influences and modulates adaptive immunity [16]. The sustained interaction and maintenance of the complex balance between the gut microbiota and adaptive immune system are essential for intestinal homeostasis and the inhibition of inflammation, ensuring an optimal immune response and long-term protection after vaccination [17].
The relationship between peak antibody titers and the gut microbiota after vaccination against SARS-CoV-2 has been investigated in several studies [18–20]. However, the relationship between the durability of vaccine-induced antibodies and microbiota has not yet been studied. In this study, we investigated the association between the gut microbiota and durability of humoral immunity, which may provide insights into approaches for enhancing vaccine efficacy.
Materials and methods
Study design and participants
In this study, we prospectively recruited healthy adults who had received a single dose of the BNT162b2 or ChAdOx1 vaccines and were scheduled to get the second dose of the primary vaccination series. After enrollment, the participants were divided into two cohorts: those receiving two doses of the BNT162b2 vaccine (BNT162b2 cohort) and those receiving two doses of the ChAdOx1 vaccine (ChAdOx1 cohort). Following this, all participants were administered a booster vaccination with the BNT162b2 vaccine. Fecal and blood samples were collected at four time points: V1 (prior to the second dose of the primary vaccination series), V2 (3 weeks after the second dose), V3 (6 months after the second dose and prior to the booster dose), and V4 (3 weeks after the BNT162b2 booster dose). Data on patient demographics, medications, probiotics, supplements, laboratory results, and dietary records were collected at each time point.
Participants were excluded if they received medications that could have affected the gut microbiota, including antibiotics, laxatives, and motility drugs in the month prior to vaccination; had a history of positive SARS-CoV-2 results by nasopharyngeal PCR testing; or tested positive for serum antinuclear capsid protein (N) IgG. None of the participants contracted COVID-19 during the study period, as confirmed by anti-N IgG antibody testing (Abbott Laboratories, Chicago, IL, USA).
Fecal samples were collected in a nucleic acid preservation medium using Fecal Swab DNA Preservation and Transport Kits (Noble Bio, Hwaseong, South Korea) and stored at − 80 °C. Blood samples were collected in serum separation tubes via venipuncture. After centrifugation at 2500 rpm and − 4 °C for 10 min, the serum was transferred to clean plastic screw-capped vials and stored at − 80 °C.
The study protocol was approved by the Institutional Review Board of Korea University Guro Hospital (2021GR0097). Informed consent was obtained from all participants. All procedures were performed in accordance with the ethical standards of the relevant institutional and/or national research committees, the Helsinki Declaration of 1964 and its subsequent amendments, or comparable ethical standards.
Classification of study groups based on the immune response after vaccination
Humoral immune responses were assessed using corresponding serum samples. Anti-S titers were measured using the Elecsys® Anti-SARS-CoV-2 S assay kit (Roche, Rotkreuz, Switzerland) according to the manufacturer's protocol. Titers below the lower limit of quantitation were set to 0.4 U/mL.
The half-life of anti-S antibodies was determined from the V2–V3 time points. To investigate the microbial factors associated with the durability of vaccine-induced antibodies, participants from the BNT162b2 and ChAdOx1 vaccine cohorts were divided into slow- and fast-decay groups based on the median values of antibody half-life.
After receiving the BNT162b2 booster, the acute antibody responses were evaluated by comparing the fold changes in antibody titers between V3 and V4. Using the median fold-change in antibody titers across all booster vaccine recipients, participants were classified as either high or low responders.
Analysis pipeline for 16S rRNA
Total DNA was extracted using the FastDNA® SPIN Kit for Soil (MP Biomedicals, Santa Ana, CA, USA) according to the manufacturer's instructions. The extracted DNA was PCR amplified by CJ Bioscience (Seoul, Republic of Korea) using fusion primers targeting the V3–V4 regions of the 16S rRNA gene. PCR products were confirmed by electrophoresis on a 1% agarose gel, followed by visualization using the Gel Doc system (Bio-Rad, Hercules, CA, USA). The amplified products were purified using a CleanPCR kit (CleanNA, Waddinxveen, The Netherlands). Equal concentrations of purified products were pooled, and short fragments (nontarget products) were removed using a CleanPCR kit (CleanNA). The quality and size of products were assessed on a Bioanalyzer 2100 system (Agilent, Palo Alto, CA, USA) using a DNA 7500 chip. Mixed amplicons were pooled and sequenced using an Illumina MiSeq Sequencing System (Illumina, San Diego, CA, USA) according to the manufacturer's instructions. Analysis was performed using the EzBioCloud 16S-based Microbiome Taxonomic Profiling (MTP) and CJ Bioscience's bioinformatics cloud platform (https://www.ezbiocloud.net). All microbiome count data were normalized to that of 1000 read counts before further use.
The alpha diversity indices (abundance-based coverage estimator [ACE] and Simpson) were calculated as previously described [21–26]. To visualize sample differences, beta diversity distances were calculated using the Jensen–Shannon, Bray–Curtis, Generalized UniFrac, and Fast UniFrac algorithms as appropriate [27–30]. With respect to antibody durability and fold-change, taxonomic and functional biomarkers were identified using the linear discriminant analysis (LDA) effect size method [31]. An LDA effect size of ≥ 2.0 was considered significant. Functional profiles were predicted using PICRUSt and MinPath algorithms [32, 33]. Raw reads were quality-checked, and low-quality (< Q25) reads were filtered using Trimmomatic ver. 0.32. After quality control processing, paired-end sequence data were merged using the fastq_mergepairs command in VSEARCH ver. 2.13.4. with the default parameters. Next, the primers were trimmed using the Myers–Miller alignment algorithm at a similarity cut-off of 0.8 [34]. Nonspecific amplicons, such as those not encoding 16S rRNA, were detected using the nhmmer algorithm in the HMMER software package ver. 3.2.1 with hmm profiles [35]. Unique reads were extracted, and redundant reads were clustered with unique reads using the deep-full-length command in VSEARCH [36]. Taxonomic assignment was performed using the EzBioCloud 16S rRNA database with the usearch_global command in VSEARCH, followed by a more precise pairwise alignment [34, 36, 37]. Chimeric reads were filtered to obtain reads with < 97% similarity through reference-based chimeric read detection using the UCHIME algorithm and nonchimeric 16S rRNA database from EzBioCloud [38]. After chimeric filtering, reads not identified to the species level (< 97% similarity) in the EzBioCloud database were compiled, and the cluster_fast command was used for de novo clustering to generate additional OTUs. OTUs with single reads (singletons) were excluded from further analysis [36]. Secondary analyses, including diversity calculations and biomarker discovery, were performed using in-house programs from CJ Bioscience.
Analysis pipeline for shotgun sequencing
Genomic DNA was extracted from isolates using the FastDNA™ Spin Kit for Soil (MP Biomedicals) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. The concentration of the extracted DNA was quantified using a Qubit 2.0 fluorometer (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA, USA). Sequencing libraries were constructed using the NEBNext Ultra II FS DNA Library Prep Kit for Illumina (NEB, Ipswich, MA, USA) according to the manufacturer’s protocol for use with inputs ≤ 100 ng. Metagenome sequencing was performed on the NextSeq 1000 system with 2 × 150 bp paired-end reads using a 300-cycle (NextSeq 1000 Reagent Kit) sequencing kit. The profiling process began by surveying the potential presence of bacterial and archaeal species in each raw metagenomic sample read using Kraken2 [39] and a prebuilt core gene database [40] containing k-mers (k = 35) of reference genomes obtained from the EzBioCloud database [37]. After acquiring a list of candidate species, a custom bowtie2 [41] database was built using the core genes of species identified during the first step. The raw samples were then mapped against the bowtie2 database using the very-sensitive option and a phred33 quality threshold. Samtools [42] was used to convert and sort the output BAM file. The coverage of the mapped reads against the BAM file was obtained using Bedtools [43]. To avoid false positives, an in-house script was used to quantify all reads mapped to a given species only if the total coverage of their core genes was ≥ 25%. Finally, species abundance was calculated using the total number of count reads, while normalized species abundance was calculated using the total length of all core genes.
Taxonomic data were calculated as the species ratio based on the analysis using the Bacteria and Archaea database. In contrast, functional data were obtained as counts per million values based on the analysis using the Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes (KEGG), Enzyme commission, and EggNOG databases [44]. Functional profiling was conducted using HUMAnN (the HMP Unified Metabolic Analysis Network). HUMAnN uses metagenomic data as input and processes them to estimate the functions of the microbial community. This was done by comparing the genetic sequences to a database of known microbial genes and pathways and then inferring the functions of the community [45].
Statistical analysis
All continuous variables are expressed as the median ± interquartile range (IQR; third IQR–first IQR), whereas categorical variables are presented as numbers (percentages). Nonparametric tests were used to compare the differences between different groups. Statistical analysis was performed using the LDA effect size method to support high-dimensional class comparisons with a particular focus on metagenomic analyses and depicted using the R Statistical Software (version 4.1.2; R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria) with the ggplot2 and vegan packages.
Results
From March to April 2021, we prospectively recruited 44 healthy adults who received the first dose of either the BNT162b2 (n = 23) or ChAdOx1 (n = 21) vaccine and were scheduled to receive the second dose of the primary vaccination series (Fig. 1). The median age of the study participants was 31 ± 8.5 years, with 75% (33) being women. The baseline geometric mean titer of anti-S IgG of all participants was 98.3 U/mL (Table S1). We analyzed fecal and blood samples at four time points: V1 (prior to the second dose), V2 (3 weeks after the second dose), V3 (6 months after the second dose and prior to the booster dose), and V4 (3 weeks after the BNT162b2 booster dose). After the two-dose primary vaccination series, the median antibody half-life between V2 and V3 was 141.0 d in the BNT162b2 cohort, whereas it was 63.4 d in the ChAdOx1 cohort. Based on the half-life of anti-S IgG antibodies, each vaccination cohort was classified into slow- and fast-decay groups (Tables S2 and S3). After the booster dose vaccination, the BNT162b2 recipients were divided into two groups (high versus low responders) based on the median value (34-fold) of the antibody fold-change from V3 to V4 (Table S4).
Of the 176 stool samples collected, 13 were excluded because of poor quality, leaving 36 (V1), 39 (V2), and 44 (V3 and V4) samples for gut microbiota analysis. Using corresponding blood samples, we evaluated the anti-S humoral immune response. During the follow-up period, the study participants did not show any major changes in their dietary habits (data not shown; a pseudonymized individual study dataset can be made available upon request).
Association between anti-S antibody half-life and gut microbiota using 16S rRNA sequencing in the BNT162b2 cohort
Regarding alpha diversity, we calculated species richness and diversity using the abundance-based coverage estimator (ACE) and Simpson indices, which revealed significant differences between the slow- and fast-decay groups (Fig. 2A). The ACE index in the slow-decay group at V2 was significantly higher than that in the fast-decay group at V2 (p = 0.035) and V3 (p = 0.012), indicating higher species richness in the former. Similarly, the Simpson index in the slow-decay group at V2 was significantly lower (higher diversity) than that in the fast-decay group at both V2 (p = 0.035) and V3 (p = 0.049). Interestingly, these differences in the alpha diversity indices between the two groups disappeared six months after the second dose (V3) (ACE index, p = 0.176; Simpson index, p = 0.712). Analysis using the Jensen–Shannon algorithm, excluding unclassified operational taxonomic units (OTUs) (Fig. 2B), revealed apparent differences in beta diversity values between V2 and V3 in the slow-decay (p = 0.018) and fast-decay (p = 0.002) groups.
Following the two-dose primary vaccination series, the slow-decay group exhibited distinctly abundant bacterial species in the gut microbiota from stool samples collected 3 weeks after the second dose compared with those in the fast-decay group (Table 1 and Table S5). Certain bacterial species were significantly associated with slower antibody decay in individuals who received the BNT162b2 vaccine. Faecalibacterium prausnitzii was the most abundant species, with a linear discriminant analysis (LDA) effect size of 4.26175 (p = 0.04095). Prevotella_uc and PAC001304_s, both from the genus Prevotella, showed LDA effect sizes of 4.25488 (p = 0.00819) and 4.15907 (p = 0.04801), respectively. Another notable species, Gemmiger formicilis from the family Ruminococcaceae, had an LDA effect size of 3.91776 (p = 0.03896), whereas Bacteroides dorei, a member of the family Bacteroidaceae, had an LDA effect size of 3.71884 (p = 0.01251). Similarly, Agathobacter rectalis, a member of the family Lachnospiraceae, had an LDA effect size of 3.49743 (p = 0.04703). In addition, PAC001173_s, PAC000195_s, JPJG_s, PAC001037_s, PAC001187_s, PAC001335_s, and Bacteroides_uc showed pronounced LDA effect sizes, indicating their potential contributions to the modulation of vaccine-induced immunity. At the genus level (Table S5), Prevotella had an LDA effect size of 4.62838 (p = 0.0147), followed by Faecalibacterium with an effect size of 4.26036 (p = 0.04791). Other significant genera were Subdoligranulum (LDA = 3.98239, p = 0.01467), Agathobacter (LDA = 3.50072, p = 0.04703), and Eubacterium_g23 (LDA = 3.05084, p = 0.00962). Finally, the compelling LDA effect sizes of PAC000195_g, PAC000196_g, PAC000692_g, and PAC001236_g suggested their potential effect in vaccine-mediated host immune responses.
Table 1.
Taxon name | Taxon rank | Taxonomy | LDA effect size | p-value |
---|---|---|---|---|
BNT162b2 | ||||
Faecalibacterium prausnitzii | Species | Bacteria: Firmicutes: Clostridia: Clostridiales: Ruminococcaceae: Faecalibacterium | 4.26175 | 0.04095 |
Prevotella_uc | Species | Bacteria: Bacteroidetes: Bacteroidia: Bacteroidales: Prevotellaceae: Prevotella | 4.25488 | 0.00819 |
PAC001304_s | Species | Bacteria: Bacteroidetes: Bacteroidia: Bacteroidales: Prevotellaceae: Prevotella | 4.15907 | 0.04801 |
Gemmiger formicilis | Species | Bacteria: Firmicutes: Clostridia: Clostridiales: Ruminococcaceae: Subdoligranulum | 3.91776 | 0.03896 |
Bacteroides dorei | Species | Bacteria: Bacteroidetes: Bacteroidia: Bacteroidales: Bacteroidaceae: Bacteroides | 3.71884 | 0.01251 |
Agathobacter rectalis | Species | Bacteria: Firmicutes: Clostridia: Clostridiales: Lachnospiraceae: Agathobacter | 3.49743 | 0.04703 |
PAC001173_s | Species | Bacteria: Firmicutes: Clostridia: Clostridiales: Ruminococcaceae: Subdoligranulum | 3.14941 | 0.04366 |
PAC000195_s | Species | Bacteria: Firmicutes: Clostridia: Clostridiales: Lachnospiraceae: PAC000195_g | 3.1406 | 0.0476 |
JPJG_s | Species | Bacteria: Firmicutes: Clostridia: Clostridiales: Ruminococcaceae: Oscillibacter | 3.01913 | 0.04765 |
PAC001037_s | Species | Bacteria: Firmicutes: Clostridia: Clostridiales: Ruminococcaceae: Oscillibacter | 2.6809 | 0.01235 |
PAC001187_s | Species | Bacteria: Firmicutes: Clostridia: Clostridiales: Ruminococcaceae: Oscillibacter | 2.6189 | 0.00492 |
PAC001335_s | Species | Bacteria: Firmicutes: Clostridia: Clostridiales: Lachnospiraceae: PAC000196_g | 2.55763 | 0.03297 |
Bacteroides_uc | Species | Bacteria: Bacteroidetes: Bacteroidia: Bacteroidales: Bacteroidaceae: Bacteroides | 2.53203 | 0.03742 |
Bacteroides xylanisolvens | Species | Bacteria: Bacteroidetes: Bacteroidia: Bacteroidales: Bacteroidaceae: Bacteroides | 2.38654 | 0.04201 |
PAC001229_s | Species | Bacteria: Firmicutes: Clostridia: Clostridiales: Lachnospiraceae: PAC000692_g | 2.32714 | 0.02256 |
PAC001162_s | Species | Bacteria: Firmicutes: Clostridia: Clostridiales: Ruminococcaceae: Sporobacter | 2.23478 | 0.04096 |
PAC001306_s | Species | Bacteria: Firmicutes: Clostridia: Clostridiales: Ruminococcaceae: Sporobacter | 2.21794 | 0.04844 |
PAC001467_s | Species | Bacteria: Firmicutes: Clostridia: Clostridiales: Lachnospiraceae: PAC000692_g | 2.13406 | 0.01007 |
PAC001130_s | Species | Bacteria: Firmicutes: Clostridia: Clostridiales: Ruminococcaceae: Oscillibacter | 2.12692 | 0.03535 |
PAC001236_s | Species | Bacteria: Firmicutes: Clostridia: Clostridiales: Mogibacterium_f: PAC001236_g | 2.11986 | 0.01768 |
PAC001449_s | Species | Bacteria: Firmicutes: Clostridia: Clostridiales: Lachnospiraceae: PAC001043_g | 2.08894 | 0.01923 |
ChAdOx1 | ||||
Escherichia coli | Species | Bacteria: Proteobacteria: Gammaproteobacteria: Enterobacterales: Enterobacteriaceae: Escherichia | 3.85796 | 0.00937 |
LDA, linear discriminant analysis. LDA effect size and p-value are expressed as values of V2
Following the BNT162b2 administration, we performed 16S rRNA gene sequencing analysis of the gut microbiota and identified specific functional marker proteins that may affect antibody decay rates (Table S6). Interestingly, we found that the key functional markers were starch-binding outer membrane proteins from the SusD/RagB family (LDA = 3.02715, p = 0.02956), RNA polymerase sigma-70 factor from the ECF subfamily (LDA = 2.89815, p = 0.03486), and iron complex outer membrane receptor protein (LDA = 2.89246, p = 0.01222). Other noteworthy markers included the TonB-dependent starch-binding outer membrane protein SusC (LDA = 2.83329, p = 0.03486), an uncharacterized protein (LDA = 2.58362, p = 0.00686), a multidrug resistance protein of the MATE family (LDA = 2.56360, p = 0.04095), a HlyD family secretion protein (LDA = 2.53494, p = 0.01470), and integrase/recombinase XerD (LDA = 2.51074, p = 0.04791).
Further investigation into the functional capabilities of the microbiota revealed specific modules and pathways that may influence vaccine immunogenicity. PICRUSt analysis revealed that F-type ATPase (LDA = 2.93490, p = 0.00686) and an incomplete reductive citrate cycle (LDA = 2.69979, p = 0.04095) were significantly associated with a longer antibody half-life. MinPath analysis highlighted the positive relationship between a longer half-life and lysine biosynthesis via the aromatic amino acid pathway (LDA = 2.74262, p = 0.01470) and formaldehyde assimilation via the serine pathway (LDA = 2.73185, p = 0.01761). Furthermore, PICRUSt analysis identified the lysosome (LDA = 2.53934, p = 0.02956) and photosynthesis (LDA = 2.46671, p = 0.00835) pathways, whereas MinPath analysis revealed the vitamin B6 metabolism (LDA = 3.15938, p = 0.01382) and lipopolysaccharide biosynthesis (LDA = 3.09433, p = 0.01162) pathways to be more abundant in the slow-decay group.
Association between anti-S antibody half-life and gut microbiota using 16S rRNA sequencing in the ChAdOx1 cohort
Unlike the BNT162b2 cohort, we did not detect any significant differences in alpha and beta diversity between groups in the ChAdOx1 cohort (data not shown). Postvaccination analysis of stool samples collected from ChAdOx1 recipients 3 weeks after the second dose revealed the presence of distinct gut bacterial species associated with longer antibody half-lives (Table 1 and Table S5). Specifically, Escherichia coli was associated with slow antibody decay (LDA effect size of 3.85796, p = 0.00937). At the genus level, Alistipes was significantly more abundant, with an LDA of 4.46179 (p = 0.03844), followed by Escherichia (LDA = 3.8579, p = 0.00937), Parabacteroides (LDA = 3.85644, p = 0.01235), and Enterococcus (LDA = 3.23579, p = 0.04323).
Detailed 16S rRNA gene analysis of samples from ChAdOx1 recipients revealed specific functional markers based on their gut microbiota (Table S6). In particular, we identified the insertion element IS1 protein InsB (LDA = 2.47573, p = 0.00937) and transposase (LDA = 2.44395, p = 0.00937) as primary ortholog markers reflecting a longer antibody half-life. Further exploration of specific modules and pathways showed that ADP-L-glycero-D-mannohypertose biosynthesis (LDA = 2.50396, p = 0.01614) and photorespiration (LDA = 2.40116, p = 0.04331) were correlated with a longer antibody half-life in PICRUSt analysis, whereas the trehalose biosynthetic pathway (LDA = 2.70821, p = 0.00937) was identified in MinPath analysis.
Association between gut microbiota and acute immune response after BNT162b2 booster vaccination—comparison of the fold changes of anti-S antibody titers
To evaluate acute antibody responses after the BNT162b2 booster vaccination, we divided vaccine recipients into two groups (high versus low responders) based on the median value (34-fold) of the antibody fold-change.
Using 16S rRNA gene sequencing, we did not detect any significant differences in alpha and beta diversity between the two groups (data not shown). Table 2 shows the gut microbiota that potentially contributed to significant fold changes in antibody titers following booster vaccination. In species-level analysis, F. prausnitzii, a member of the family Ruminococcaceae, was abundant in high responders, exhibiting the highest LDA effect size of 4.40539 (p = 0.03998). Peptoniphilus duerdenii (LDA effect size 2.98548, p = 0.03822) of the family Peptoniphilaceae, JRNA_s (LDA effect size 2.30296, p = 0.04727) of the family Mogibacterium_f, PAC001048_s (LDA effect size 2.18111, p = 0.02423) of the family Ruminococcaceae, and Anaerococcus provencensis (LDA effect size 2.16254, p = 0.01913) of the family Peptoniphilaceae were also significantly enriched in high responders. At the genus level (Table S7), Faecalibacterium, belonging to the family Ruminococcaceae of the order Clostridiales in the phylum Firmicutes, was abundant in high responders, exhibiting the highest LDA effect size of 4.40882 (p = 0.03998). Similarly, Clostridium (LDA effect size 3.65726, p = 0.02734) and Agathobaculum (LDA effect size 2.41073, p = 0.03071), both of the order Clostridiales, were associated with a higher antibody fold-change.
Table 2.
Taxon name | Taxon rank | Taxonomy | LDA effect size | p-value |
---|---|---|---|---|
Faecalibacterium prausnitzii | Species | Bacteria: Firmicutes: Clostridia: Clostridiales: Ruminococcaceae: Faecalibacterium | 4.40539 | 0.03998 |
Peptoniphilus duerdenii | Species | Bacteria: Firmicutes: Tissierellia: Tissierellales: Peptoniphilaceae: Peptoniphilus | 2.98548 | 0.03822 |
JRNA_s | Species | Bacteria: Firmicutes: Clostridia: Clostridiales: Mogibacterium_f: JRNA_g | 2.30296 | 0.04727 |
PAC001048_s | Species | Bacteria: Firmicutes: Clostridia: Clostridiales: Ruminococcaceae: PAC000672_g | 2.18111 | 0.02423 |
Anaerococcus provencensis | Species | Bacteria: Firmicutes: Tissierellia: Tissierellales: Peptoniphilaceae: Anaerococcus | 2.16254 | 0.01913 |
LDA, linear discriminant analysis. LDA effect size and p-value are expressed as values of V3
Shotgun sequencing-based microbiota analysis yielded consistent results (Fig. 3). In particular, the species F. prausnitzii (high: 2.8%, low: 1.05%) and P. duerdenii (high: 0.55%, low: 0%) and the genus Faecalibacterium (high: 15.7%, low: 11.2%) were more abundant in high than in low responders.
Correlation between abundance of specific gut microbiota and antibody half-life or titer fold changes
To elucidate the correlations between species-level taxonomic markers (with an LDA effect size > 2.0) and antibody half-life in the BNT162b2 and ChAdOx1 vaccine cohorts, we conducted Spearman’s correlation analysis. Significance was determined using criteria of absolute correlation coefficients > 0.4 and p-values < 0.05 (Figure S1). In the BNT162b2 cohort, we observed notable positive correlations between the antibody half-life and F. prausnitzii, Prevotella_uc, PAC001304_s, A. rectalis, PAC001173_s, JPJG_s, PAC001187_s, and PAC001335_s. In contrast, in the ChAdOx1 cohort the antibody half-life was only positively correlated with E. coli. Additionally, F. prausnitzii and JRNA_s were positively correlated with the fold changes in antibody titers.
Shotgun sequencing-based functional gene analysis—comparison of the fold changes of anti-S antibody titers following BNT162b2 booster vaccination
A detailed shotgun-based analysis of BNT162b2 booster vaccine recipients revealed specific functional markers in the gut microbiome (Table 3). In particular, the translation initiation factor IF-1 (LDA = 2.5893, p = 0.0433), ATP-dependent Clp protease, protease subunit (LDA = 2.5134, p = 0.0341), large subunit ribosomal protein L35 (LDA = 2.4083, p = 0.2066), ribosome-binding factor A (LDA = 2.3489, p = 0.0341), bacterial/archaeal transporter family-2 protein (LDA = 2.21821, p = 0.0341), beta-lactamase class A TEM [EC:3.5.2.6] (LDA = 2.2132, p = 0.0178), and excinuclease ABC subunit B (LDA = 2.187, p = 0.03433) were more abundant in high than in low responders. Except for one marker (bacterial/archaeal transporter family-2 protein), high responders showed higher abundances of these primary ortholog markers. Using the Clusters of Orthologous Genes (COG) database, we identified the IstB domain ATP-binding protein (LDA = 2.6756, p = 0.0421) as an important marker of an increased antibody response. This gene is associated with DNA replication, membrane fusion, and gene expression regulation [46]. Furthermore, EC:2.1.1.37 (cytosine-specific DNA methyltransferase) and EC:4.2.3.4 (3-dehydroquinate synthase) were enriched in high responders compared with those in low responders.
Table 3.
Meta shotgun | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Definition | High V4 | Low V4 | LDA effect size | p-value | |
COG (eggNoG) | |||||
COG1484 | IstB domain protein ATP-binding protein | 0.116 | 0.0421 | 2.6756 | 0.0421 |
Ortholog | |||||
K02518 | Translation initiation factor IF-1 | 0.2564 | 0.1872 | 2.5893 | 0.0433 |
K01358 | ATP-dependent Clp protease, protease subunit [EC:3.4.21.92] | 0.168 | 0.1052 | 2.5134 | 0.0341 |
K02916 | Large subunit ribosomal protein L35 | 0.2111 | 0.1582 | 2.4083 | 0.0266 |
K02834 | Ribosome-binding factor A | 0.133 | 0.0893 | 2.3489 | 0.0341 |
K09936 | Bacterial/archaeal transporter family-2 protein | 0.0161 | 0.0415 | 2.2182 | 0.0341 |
K18698 | Beta-lactamase class A TEM [EC:3.5.2.6] | 0.0412 | 0 | 2.2132 | 0.0178 |
K03702 | Excinuclease ABC subunit B | 0.1087 | 0.0772 | 2.187 | 0.0433 |
EC (enzyme commission) | |||||
2.1.1.37 | DNA (cytosine-5-)-methyltransferase | 0.1886 | 0.1208 | 2.4818 | 0.1208 |
4.2.3.4 | 3-dehydroquinate synthase | 0.1684 | 0.1199 | 2.3975 | 0.1199 |
Discussion
In this longitudinal cohort study of SARS-CoV-2 vaccine recipients, the longevity of anti-S antibodies was significantly associated with the gut microbiota composition. Specifically, F. prausnitzii, Prevotella_uc, and PAC001304_s from the genera Prevotella, as well as G. formicilis, B. dorei, and A. rectalis were associated with a significantly prolonged antibody half-life after SARS-CoV-2 mRNA vaccination. Analysis of the associations between gut microbiota species and fold changes in antibody titers after BNT162b2 booster vaccination revealed that, in comparison to low responders, high responders had a significantly higher abundance of F. prausnitzii, which activates the metabolic pathways EC:2.1.1.37 (cytosine-specific DNA methyltransferase) and EC:4.2.3.4 (3-dehydroquinate synthase).
Antibody longevity is influenced by long-lived plasma cells, which are mainly located in the bone marrow, while the magnitude of the acute antibody response to booster vaccinations is likely determined by memory B-cells. Both long-lived plasma and memory B-cells are influenced by the interaction of B-cells, follicular helper T (Tfh) cells, and follicular dendritic cells in the germinal center of B-cell follicles. Kim et al. discovered that short-chain fatty acids (SCFAs) facilitate Tfh cell differentiation both in vitro and in vivo by upregulating cellular metabolism in activated T-cells [47]. Moreover, SCFAs, notably butyrate, have been shown to increase the population of Foxp3 + regulatory T-cells (Tregs) in the colon [48, 49]. Interestingly, under specific conditions, certain Tregs can be converted into Tfh cells within Peyer’s patches [50, 51].
SCFAs promote antibody production via various mechanisms that profoundly affect the human immune system. First, SCFAs effectively enhance the cellular metabolism of B-cells, providing the necessary energy and building blocks for the activation, differentiation, and antibody production of B-cells. In addition, SCFAs increase mitochondrial energy production and glycolysis, which are essential for plasma cell differentiation [52]. Second, SCFAs are involved in the regulation of cellular metabolic pathways as they are converted to acetyl-CoA, which is used for energy production and fatty acid synthesis. In SCFA-treated B-cells, the levels of acetyl-CoA and lipid droplets increase, thereby fostering B-cell differentiation and antibody production [47]. Third, SCFAs regulate the expression of key genes involved in B-cell differentiation. In particular, they upregulate the expression of the immunoglobulin gene family members and that of genes such as Xbp1, Irf4, and Aicda, which are vital for plasma B-cell differentiation and Ig class switch recombination [47]. Finally, SCFAs activate T-cells and phagocytes, enhancing antibody responses [49, 53–55]. Specifically, SCFAs promote the generation and function of Tfh cells, which play a key role in B-cell differentiation and the germinal center reaction, leading to the production of high-affinity antibodies and long-term humoral responses [47]. In this study, the group with a longer antibody half-life (slow decay) within the BNT162b2 cohort was significantly enriched in F. prausnitzii, which is one of the most important butyrate-producing species [56]. Other SCFA-producing bacterial agents, including members of the genera Prevotella and Bacteroides, as well as the families Ruminococcaceae and Lachnospiraceae, were also significantly abundant in the slow decay group.
Moreover, F. prausnitzii is one of the most abundant bacteria present in the healthy human gut [57], where it plays a crucial role in the induction of colonic Treg cells [58]. Tregs modulate the immune response and maintain immune homeostasis [59]. Therefore, in individuals with a high abundance of F. prausnitzii, the unnecessary nonspecific activation of T-cells might be suppressed, and chronic low-grade inflammation might be reduced, ensuring an appropriate immune response upon exposure to antigens. These findings align with the concept of inflammaging (age-related chronic inflammation), underscoring the decline in the numbers of anti-inflammatory bacteria such as F. prausnitzii in older individuals [60].
Our study suggested a potential association between a high abundance of E. coli in the gut and an extended antibody half-life in ChAdOx1 vaccine recipients. Antibody half-life is modulated by several factors, including the magnitude of the immune response, antibody production efficiency, and degradation kinetics. E. coli secretes signaling molecules with notable immunostimulatory properties such as LTA1 (A1 domain of heat-labile enterotoxin), monophosphoryl lipid A, and maltose-binding protein, which are instrumental in dendritic cell (DC) activation [61–63]. Upon activation, DCs relocate to the proximate lymph nodes to present the antigens to T-cells, potentially initiating T- and B-cell activation. Furthermore, E. coli has been suggested to amplify the activity of proinflammatory CD4 + T-cells, potentially heightening the responsiveness to vaccine antigens [64]. In the case of adenovirus-vector vaccines, the quantitative and qualitative activity of DCs may be particularly important in inducing a strong and durable immune response [65].
In the slow-decay group of the BNT162b2 cohort, a notable activation of Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes (KEGG) orthologs K21572 and K21573, which are starch-binding outer membrane proteins, was observed. Specifically, K21572 was associated with the SusD/RagB family, whereas K21573 was associated with SusC. These proteins play pivotal roles in starch binding and transport. A significant proportion of Bacteroidetes strains, particularly those belonging to the genera Prevotella and Bacteroides, have evolved to specialize in the breakdown of complex carbohydrates [66, 67]. The observed increase in the abundance of these microbial species in our taxonomic analysis may be correlated with the heightened activation of the above-mentioned KEGG orthologs. Furthermore, the metabolism of starch and other intricate carbohydrates by gut microbes often leads to SCFA production [68]. Therefore, K21572 and K21573 may influence SCFA synthesis, indirectly affecting antibody longevity.
Memory T-cells, particularly memory Tfh cells, assist in activating B-cells, which then differentiate into antibody-producing plasma cells [69]. Therefore, a strong memory T-cell response can support rapid and robust antibody production during subsequent encounters with a pathogen. In 16S gene analysis of the BNT162b2 cohort, we observed that the ortholog K01897, together with module M00157 and pathway ko00540, which are functional markers of oxidative phosphorylation and lipid metabolism, respectively, were notably activated in the slow antibody decay group. Memory T-cells typically exhibit a metabolic profile that relies more on oxidative phosphorylation and lipid metabolism, whereas activated effector T-cells are more glycolysis-dependent [70]. Given this distinction, our findings suggested that the activation of K01897, M00157, and ko00540 in the slow-decay group may be associated with the activation of memory T-cells.
In shotgun sequencing-based functional gene analysis, we found that the aromatic amino acid synthesis pathways serve as a link between the gut microbiota and the vaccine immune response. The synthesis of aromatic amino acids (L-tyrosine, L-phenylalanine, and L-tryptophan), which are essential for protein biosynthesis in all living organisms, is accomplished via the shikimate and chorismate pathways. These metabolic pathways exist in some protists, bacteria, fungi, and plants, but not in animals [71]. In particular, the shikimate pathway connects primary metabolism and aromatic amino acid biosynthesis. The first enzyme in the shikimate pathway, 3-deoxy-D-arabino-heptulosonate 7-phosphate synthase (DAHPS), generates 3-deoxy-D-arabino-heptulosonate 7-phosphate (DAHP), while the second enzyme, 3-dehydroquinate synthase (DHQS), converts DAHP into 3-dehydroquinate. DAHPSs are divided into two types according to their amino acid homology: type I DAHPS derived from microorganisms, and type II DAHPS found in plants and some microorganisms [72, 73]. F. prausnitzii activates the shikimate and phenylpropanoid pathways by inducing the activity of 3-dehydroquinate synthase (EC:4.2.3.4), which is involved in the early increase in the expression of DAHPS and phenylalanine ammonia lyase (PAL). In this study, shotgun-based analysis revealed that F. prausnitzii and EC:4.2.3.4 were more abundant in high responders to the BNT162b2 booster vaccination. In plants, the expression of DAHPS1 is strongly induced within 1 h of wound infection, whereas the expression of PAL has been reported to play a major role in inducing resistance to cassava brown streak disease by pathogenic viruses, reflecting early immune responses [74, 75]. In contrast, EC:2.1.1.37 (cytosine-specific DNA methyltransferase), another enriched enzyme in high responders, is known to be involved in gene expression, genome protection against selfish DNA developmental regulation, and T-cell development [76]. Furthermore, six ortholog markers, which were more abundant in high responders, are also involved in maintaining and regulating cellular functions, such as protein synthesis, DNA damage removal, and resynthesis. Considering the results of taxonomic and functional analyses, including enzyme and ortholog analyses (Table 3), the gut microbiome may be significantly associated with the vaccine immune response at the cellular level.
As discussed above so far, the gut microbiota composition might play an important role in modulating the process of immune response after vaccination. Growing evidences have shown that the abundance of phylum Actinobacteria is consistently associated with good vaccine immune responses [77]. Some genera and species of Firmicutes and Proteobacteria is also known to affect vaccine immune responses [77]. Conversely, the composition of gut microbiome is also affected by vaccination as shown among the BNT162b2 recipients in this study. Vaccination might induce changes in the gut microbiota composition, thereby influencing vaccine immunogenicity. A recent study reported that both inactivated and mRNA SARS-CoV-2 vaccination led to lower gut microbial diversity with the relatively high abundance of Bacteroides caccae and low abundance of Coprococcus comes, Dorea longicatena and Ruminococcus obeum [18]. Several studies have highlighted the bidirectional relationship between the gut microbiota and vaccine efficacy, emphasizing that the gut microbiota can influence the immune response to vaccines—including cholera, rotavirus, hepatitis B, tetanus, and influenza vaccines, not limited to the COVID-19 vaccine—and that vaccination itself can also lead to changes in the gut microbiota [78–80]. It is uncertain whether the composition of gut microbiota is influenced mainly by the vaccine platform or by the antigen itself in relation to the immune response pattern.
This study had several strengths, including both short- and long-term assessments of vaccine immunogenicity and its association with the gut microbiome. Moreover, the linkage between the microbiota and functional pathways could be confirmed more clearly by performing both 16S rRNA and shotgun sequencing. However, this study also had some limitations. First, as this was an observational cohort study, establishing causality between specific microbiota/metabolites and vaccine immune responses was not feasible. Second, the participants in this study were healthy individuals; we did not include groups of older individuals or those with chronic medical conditions. Finally, the sample size was limited due to the rapidly evolving pandemic situation. It was necessary to exclude individuals who had contracted COVID-19 and to enroll participants who received the COVID-19 vaccine within a short timeframe that aligned with the study schedule. These limitations should be addressed in future studies to enable the investigation of causality in a more diverse cohort of participants.
In conclusion, the longevity of COVID-19 vaccine immunity was significantly associated with the composition of the gut microbiota. We showed for the first time the beneficial impact of F. prausnitzii in short and long-term vaccine immune responses and identified several intermediate metabolites and enzymes as potential postbiotic candidates for vaccine microbiome adjuvants. The results of this study provide evidence for a gut microbiome-based personalized approach for enhancing vaccine efficacy.
Supplementary Information
Acknowledgements
We express our gratitude and appreciation to Hanul Choi for her dedicated support during this research. We also thank Seolhee Lee, Heekyung Lee, and Yeseul Yoo for their assistance.
Abbreviations
- ACE
Abundance-based coverage estimator
- COG
Clusters of Orthologous Genes
- HUMAnN
HMP Unified Metabolic Analysis Network
- KEGG
Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes
- LDA
Linear discriminant analysis
- MTP
Microbiome Taxonomic Profiling
- NRF
National Research Foundation
- OTU
Operational taxonomic units
- PAL
Phenylalanine ammonia lyase
- PCoA
Principal coordinate analysis
- SCFA
Short-chain fatty acids
Author contributions
HS, JGY, JYN, HJC, WJK, and JYS conceptualized the study. HS, SL and JYS acquired the funding. HS, JGY, and SL collected the samples and metadata. SL processed the samples. HS, SL, and YH did the data analysis. HS and SL created the figures. HS, SL and JYS wrote the original draft of the manuscript. EN, YJC, EHK, CK, and JYS edited the manuscript. HS, SL, and JYS accessed and verified all the data reported in this study. All authors had full access to all the data in the study and agreed to the final decision to submit for publication. Cocorrespondence is necessary because both authors participated in hypotheses development and design of the study, and each made special contributions in clinical and analytical aspects.
Funding
This research was supported by the Bio & Medical Technology Development Program of the National Research Foundation (NRF), which is funded by the Korean government MSIT grants NRF-2021M3E5D1A01015187 (to H.S.); the Basic Science Research Program through the NRF funded by the Ministry of Education NRF-2021R1I1A1A01050391 (to H.S.) and RS-2023-00249465 (to S.L.); and a grant from the SK Bioscience Co. Ltd. Q2208691 (to J.Y.S.).
Availability of data and materials
The study data are not publicly available owing to ethical and regulatory restrictions on participant privacy. However, a pseudonymized individual study dataset will be made available from the corresponding author upon request.
Declarations
Competing interests
The authors declare that they have no competing interests.
Footnotes
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Contributor Information
Sooyeon Lim, Email: limsooy@korea.ac.kr.
Joon Young Song, Email: infection@korea.ac.kr.
References
- 1.Walsh EE, Frenck RW Jr, Falsey AR, Kitchin N, Absalon J, Gurtman A, Lockhart S, Neuzil K, Mulligan MJ, Bailey R, et al. Safety and immunogenicity of two RNA-based COVID-19 vaccine candidates. N Engl J Med. 2020;383:2439–50. 10.1056/NEJMoa2027906 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Song JY, Choi WS, Heo JY, Kim EJ, Lee JS, Jung DS, Kim SW, Park KH, Eom JS, Jeong SJ, et al. Immunogenicity and safety of SARS-CoV-2 recombinant protein nanoparticle vaccine GBP510 adjuvanted with AS03: interim results of a randomised, active-controlled, observer-blinded, phase 3 trial. EClinicalMedicine. 2023;64: 102140. 10.1016/j.eclinm.2023.102140 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Wu Z, Hu Y, Xu M, Chen Z, Yang W, Jiang Z, Li M, Jin H, Cui G, Chen P, et al. Safety, tolerability, and immunogenicity of an inactivated SARS-CoV-2 vaccine (CoronaVac) in healthy adults aged 60 years and older: a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 1/2 clinical trial. Lancet Infect Dis. 2021;21:803–12. 10.1016/S1473-3099(20)30987-7 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Ramasamy MN, Minassian AM, Ewer KJ, Flaxman AL, Folegatti PM, Owens DR, Voysey M, Aley PK, Angus B, Babbage G, et al. Safety and immunogenicity of ChAdOx1 nCoV-19 vaccine administered in a prime-boost regimen in young and old adults (COV002): a single-blind, randomised, controlled, phase 2/3 trial. Lancet. 2021;396:1979–93. 10.1016/S0140-6736(20)32466-1 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Ward H, Whitaker M, Flower B, Tang SN, Atchison C, Darzi A, Donnelly CA, Cann A, Diggle PJ, Ashby D, et al. Population antibody responses following COVID-19 vaccination in 212,102 individuals. Nat Commun. 2022;13:907. 10.1038/s41467-022-28527-x [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Yoshida T, Mei H, Dörner T, Hiepe F, Radbruch A, Fillatreau S, Hoyer BF. Memory B and memory plasma cells. Immunol Rev. 2010;237:117–39. 10.1111/j.1600-065X.2010.00938.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Manz RA, Thiel A, Radbruch A. Lifetime of plasma cells in the bone marrow. Nature. 1997;388:133–4. 10.1038/40540 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Nguyen DC, Joyner CJ, Sanz I, Lee FE. Factors affecting early antibody secreting cell maturation into long-lived plasma cells. Front Immunol. 2019;10:2138. 10.3389/fimmu.2019.02138 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Goel RR, Painter MM, Apostolidis SA, Mathew D, Meng W, Rosenfeld AM, Lundgreen KA, Reynaldi A, Khoury DS, Pattekar A, et al. mRNA vaccines induce durable immune memory to SARS-CoV-2 and variants of concern. Science. 1979;2021(374):abm0829. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Terreri S, Piano Mortari E, Vinci MR, Russo C, Alteri C, Albano C, Colavita F, Gramigna G, Agrati C, Linardos G, et al. Persistent B cell memory after SARS-CoV-2 vaccination is functional during breakthrough infections. Cell Host Microbe. 2022;30:400-408.e404. 10.1016/j.chom.2022.01.003 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Praharaj I, John SM, Bandyopadhyay R, Kang G. Probiotics, antibiotics and the immune responses to vaccines. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2015;370:20140144. 10.1098/rstb.2014.0144 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Lynn DJ, Benson SC, Lynn MA, Pulendran B. Modulation of immune responses to vaccination by the microbiota: implications and potential mechanisms. Nat Rev Immunol. 2021. 10.1038/s41577-021-00554-7. 10.1038/s41577-021-00554-7 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Hanada S, Pirzadeh M, Carver KY, Deng JC. Respiratory viral infection-induced microbiome alterations and secondary bacterial pneumonia. Front Immunol. 2018;9:2640. 10.3389/fimmu.2018.02640 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Zheng D, Liwinski T, Elinav E. Interaction between microbiota and immunity in health and disease. Cell Res. 2020;30:492–506. 10.1038/s41422-020-0332-7 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Li Y, Ye Z, Zhu J, Fang S, Meng L, Zhou C. Effects of gut microbiota on host adaptive immunity under immune homeostasis and tumor pathology state. Front Immunol. 2022;13:844335. 10.3389/fimmu.2022.844335 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Yoo JY, Groer M, Dutra SVO, Sarkar A, McSkimming DI. Gut microbiota and immune system interactions. Microorganisms. 2020;8:1587. 10.3390/microorganisms8101587 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Belkaid Y, Hand TW. Role of the microbiota in immunity and inflammation. Cell. 2014;157:121–41. 10.1016/j.cell.2014.03.011 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Ng SC, Peng Y, Zhang L, Mok CK, Zhao S, Li A, Ching JY, Liu Y, Yan S, Chan DLS, et al. Gut microbiota composition is associated with SARS-CoV-2 vaccine immunogenicity and adverse events. Gut. 2022;71:1106–16. 10.1136/gutjnl-2021-326563 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Seong H, Choi BK, Han YH, Kim JH, Gim JA, Lim S, Noh JY, Cheong HJ, Kim WJ, Song JY. Gut microbiota as a potential key to modulating humoral immunogenicity of new platform COVID-19 vaccines. Signal Transduct Target Ther. 2023;8:178. 10.1038/s41392-023-01445-0 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Alexander JL, Mullish BH, Danckert NP, Liu Z, Olbei ML, Saifuddin A, Torkizadeh M, Ibraheim H, Blanco JM, Roberts LA, et al. The gut microbiota and metabolome are associated with diminished COVID-19 vaccine-induced antibody responses in immunosuppressed inflammatory bowel disease patients. EBioMedicine. 2023;88: 104430. 10.1016/j.ebiom.2022.104430 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Chao A, Lee S-M. Estimating the number of classes via sample coverage. J Am Stat Assoc. 1992;87:210–7. 10.1080/01621459.1992.10475194 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Chao A. Estimating the population size for capture-recapture data with unequal catchability. Biometrics. 1987;43:783–91. 10.2307/2531532 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Burnham KP, Overton WS. Robust estimation of population size when capture probabilities vary among animals. Ecology. 1979;60:927–36. 10.2307/1936861 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Magurran AE. Measuring biological diversity. Hoboken: Wiley; 2013. [Google Scholar]
- 25.Chao A, Shen T-J. Nonparametric estimation of Shannon’s index of diversity when there are unseen species in sample. Environ Ecol Stat. 2003;10:429–43. 10.1023/A:1026096204727 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Faith DP. Conservation evaluation and phylogenetic diversity. Biol Cons. 1992;61:1–10. 10.1016/0006-3207(92)91201-3 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Lin J. Divergence measures based on the Shannon entropy. IEEE Trans Inf Theory. 1991;37:145–51. 10.1109/18.61115 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Beals EW. Bray-Curtis ordination: an effective strategy for analysis of multivariate ecological data. Adv Ecol Res. 1984;14:1–55. 10.1016/S0065-2504(08)60168-3 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Chen J, Bittinger K, Charlson ES, Hoffmann C, Lewis J, Wu GD, Collman RG, Bushman FD, Li H. Associating microbiome composition with environmental covariates using generalized UniFrac distances. Bioinformatics. 2012;28:2106–13. 10.1093/bioinformatics/bts342 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Hamady M, Lozupone C, Knight R. Fast UniFrac: facilitating high-throughput phylogenetic analyses of microbial communities including analysis of pyrosequencing and PhyloChip data. ISME J. 2010;4:17–27. 10.1038/ismej.2009.97 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Segata N, Izard J, Waldron L, Gevers D, Miropolsky L, Garrett WS, Huttenhower C. Metagenomic biomarker discovery and explanation. Genome Biol. 2011;12:1–18. 10.1186/gb-2011-12-6-r60 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Ye Y, Doak TG. A parsimony approach to biological pathway reconstruction/inference for genomes and metagenomes. PLoS Comput Biol. 2009;5: e1000465. 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1000465 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Langille MG, Zaneveld J, Caporaso JG, McDonald D, Knights D, Reyes JA, Clemente JC, Burkepile DE, Thurber RLV, Knight R. Predictive functional profiling of microbial communities using 16S rRNA marker gene sequences. Nat Biotechnol. 2013;31:814–21. 10.1038/nbt.2676 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Myers EW, Miller W. Optimal alignments in linear space. Comput Appl Biosci. 1988;4:11–7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Wheeler TJ, Eddy SR. nhmmer: DNA homology search with profile HMMs. Bioinformatics. 2013;29:2487–9. 10.1093/bioinformatics/btt403 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Rognes T, Flouri T, Nichols B, Quince C, Mahé F. VSEARCH: a versatile open source tool for metagenomics. PeerJ. 2016;4: e2584. 10.7717/peerj.2584 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Yoon SH, Ha SM, Kwon S, Lim J, Kim Y, Seo H, Chun J. Introducing EzBioCloud: a taxonomically united database of 16S rRNA gene sequences and whole-genome assemblies. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol. 2017;67:1613–7. 10.1099/ijsem.0.001755 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Edgar RC, Haas BJ, Clemente JC, Quince C, Knight R. UCHIME improves sensitivity and speed of chimera detection. Bioinformatics. 2011;27:2194–200. 10.1093/bioinformatics/btr381 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Wood DE, Lu J, Langmead B. Improved metagenomic analysis with Kraken 2. Genome Biol. 2019;20:257. 10.1186/s13059-019-1891-0 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Chalita M, Ha SM, Kim YO, Oh HS, Yoon SH, Chun J. Improved metagenomic taxonomic profiling using a curated core gene-based bacterial database reveals unrecognized species in the genus Streptococcus. Pathogens. 2020;9:204. 10.3390/pathogens9030204 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Langmead B, Salzberg SL. Fast gapped-read alignment with bowtie 2. Nat Methods. 2012;9:357–9. 10.1038/nmeth.1923 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42.Li H, Handsaker B, Wysoker A, Fennell T, Ruan J, Homer N, Marth G, Abecasis G, Durbin R. The sequence alignment/map format and SAMtools. Bioinformatics. 2009;25:2078–9. 10.1093/bioinformatics/btp352 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43.Quinlan AR, Hall IM. BEDTools: a flexible suite of utilities for comparing genomic features. Bioinformatics. 2010;26:841–2. 10.1093/bioinformatics/btq033 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44.Anderson MJ. A new method for non-parametric multivariate analysis of variance. Austral Ecol. 2001;26:32–46. [Google Scholar]
- 45.Beghini F, McIver LJ, Blanco-Míguez A, Dubois L, Asnicar F, Maharjan S, Mailyan A, Manghi P, Scholz M, Thomas AM, et al. Integrating taxonomic, functional, and strain-level profiling of diverse microbial communities with bioBakery 3. eLife. 2021;10:e65088. 10.7554/eLife.65088 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46.Arias-Palomo E, Berger JM. An atypical AAA+ ATPase assembly controls efficient transposition through DNA remodeling and transposase recruitment. Cell. 2015;162:860–71. 10.1016/j.cell.2015.07.037 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47.Kim M, Qie Y, Park J, Kim CH. Gut microbial metabolites fuel host antibody responses. Cell Host Microbe. 2016;20:202–14. 10.1016/j.chom.2016.07.001 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 48.Furusawa Y, Obata Y, Fukuda S, Endo TA, Nakato G, Takahashi D, Nakanishi Y, Uetake C, Kato K, Kato T, et al. Commensal microbe-derived butyrate induces the differentiation of colonic regulatory T cells. Nature. 2013;504:446–50. 10.1038/nature12721 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 49.Smith PM, Howitt MR, Panikov N, Michaud M, Gallini CA, Bohlooly YM, Glickman JN, Garrett WS. The microbial metabolites, short-chain fatty acids, regulate colonic Treg cell homeostasis. Science. 2013;341:569–73. 10.1126/science.1241165 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 50.Xie MM, Dent AL. Unexpected help: follicular regulatory T cells in the germinal center. Front Immunol. 2018;9:1536. 10.3389/fimmu.2018.01536 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 51.Tsuji M, Komatsu N, Kawamoto S, Suzuki K, Kanagawa O, Honjo T, Hori S, Fagarasan S. Preferential generation of follicular B helper T cells from Foxp3+ T cells in gut Peyer’s patches. Science. 1979;2009(323):1488–92. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 52.Caro-Maldonado A, Wang R, Nichols AG, Kuraoka M, Milasta S, Sun LD, Gavin AL, Abel ED, Kelsoe G, Green DR, Rathmell JC. Metabolic reprogramming is required for antibody production that is suppressed in anergic but exaggerated in chronically BAFF-exposed B cells. J Immunol. 2014;192:3626–36. 10.4049/jimmunol.1302062 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 53.Kim MH, Kang SG, Park JH, Yanagisawa M, Kim CH. Short-chain fatty acids activate GPR41 and GPR43 on intestinal epithelial cells to promote inflammatory responses in mice. Gastroenterology. 2013;145:396-406.e391-310. 10.1053/j.gastro.2013.04.056 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 54.Le Poul E, Loison C, Struyf S, Springael JY, Lannoy V, Decobecq ME, Brezillon S, Dupriez V, Vassart G, Van Damme J, et al. Functional characterization of human receptors for short chain fatty acids and their role in polymorphonuclear cell activation. J Biol Chem. 2003;278:25481–9. 10.1074/jbc.M301403200 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 55.Park J, Kim M, Kang SG, Jannasch AH, Cooper B, Patterson J, Kim CH. Short-chain fatty acids induce both effector and regulatory T cells by suppression of histone deacetylases and regulation of the mTOR-S6K pathway. Mucosal Immunol. 2015;8:80–93. 10.1038/mi.2014.44 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 56.Louis P, Flint HJ. Diversity, metabolism and microbial ecology of butyrate-producing bacteria from the human large intestine. FEMS Microbiol Lett. 2009;294:1–8. 10.1111/j.1574-6968.2009.01514.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 57.Portincasa P, Bonfrate L, Vacca M, De Angelis M, Farella I, Lanza E, Khalil M, Wang DQ, Sperandio M, Di Ciaula A. Gut microbiota and short chain fatty acids: implications in glucose homeostasis. Int J Mol Sci. 2022;23:1105. 10.3390/ijms23031105 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 58.Alameddine J, Godefroy E, Papargyris L, Sarrabayrouse G, Tabiasco J, Bridonneau C, Yazdanbakhsh K, Sokol H, Altare F, Jotereau F. Faecalibacteriumprausnitzii skews human DC to prime IL10-producing T cells through TLR2/6/JNK signaling and IL-10, IL-27, CD39, and IDO-1 induction. Front Immunol. 2019;10:143. 10.3389/fimmu.2019.00143 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 59.Josefowicz SZ, Lu LF, Rudensky AY. Regulatory T cells: mechanisms of differentiation and function. Annu Rev Immunol. 2012;30:531–64. 10.1146/annurev.immunol.25.022106.141623 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 60.Miquel S, Martín R, Rossi O, Bermúdez-Humarán LG, Chatel JM, Sokol H, Thomas M, Wells JM, Langella P. Faecalibacteriumprausnitzii and human intestinal health. Curr Opin Microbiol. 2013;16:255–61. 10.1016/j.mib.2013.06.003 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 61.Valli E, Baudier RL, Harriett AJ, Norton EB. LTA1 and dmLT enterotoxin-based proteins activate antigen-presenting cells independent of PKA and despite distinct cell entry mechanisms. PLoS ONE. 2020;15: e0227047. 10.1371/journal.pone.0227047 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 62.Jeong Y, Kim GB, Ji Y, Kwak GJ, Nam GH, Hong Y, Kim S, An J, Kim SH, Yang Y, et al. Dendritic cell activation by an E coli-derived monophosphoryl lipid A enhances the efficacy of PD-1 blockade. Cancer Lett. 2020;472:19–28. 10.1016/j.canlet.2019.12.012 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 63.Fernandez S, Palmer DR, Simmons M, Sun P, Bisbing J, McClain S, Mani S, Burgess T, Gunther V, Sun W. Potential role for Toll-like receptor 4 in mediating Escherichiacoli maltose-binding protein activation of dendritic cells. Infect Immun. 2007;75:1359–63. 10.1128/IAI.00486-06 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 64.Michaelis L, Treß M, Löw HC, Klees J, Klameth C, Lange A, Grießhammer A, Schäfer A, Menz S, Steimle A, et al. Gut Commensal-induced IκBζ expression in dendritic cells influences the Th17 response. Front Immunol. 2020;11: 612336. 10.3389/fimmu.2020.612336 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 65.Mercier S, Gahéry-Segard H, Monteil M, Lengagne R, Guillet JG, Eloit M, Denesvre C. Distinct roles of adenovirus vector-transduced dendritic cells, myoblasts, and endothelial cells in mediating an immune response against a transgene product. J Virol. 2002;76:2899–911. 10.1128/JVI.76.6.2899-2911.2002 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 66.Cheng J, Hu J, Geng F, Nie S. Bacteroides utilization for dietary polysaccharides and their beneficial effects on gut health. Food Sci Human Wellness. 2022;11:1101–10. 10.1016/j.fshw.2022.04.002 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 67.Fehlner-Peach H, Magnabosco C, Raghavan V, Scher JU, Tett A, Cox LM, Gottsegen C, Watters A, Wiltshire-Gordon JD, Segata N, et al. Distinct polysaccharide utilization profiles of human intestinal prevotella copri isolates. Cell Host Microbe. 2019;26:680-690.e685. 10.1016/j.chom.2019.10.013 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 68.Arpaia N, Campbell C, Fan X, Dikiy S, van der Veeken J, deRoos P, Liu H, Cross JR, Pfeffer K, Coffer PJ, Rudensky AY. Metabolites produced by commensal bacteria promote peripheral regulatory T-cell generation. Nature. 2013;504:451–5. 10.1038/nature12726 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 69.Crotty S. T follicular helper cell differentiation, function, and roles in disease. Immunity. 2014;41:529–42. 10.1016/j.immuni.2014.10.004 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 70.Raynor JL, Chapman NM, Chi H. Metabolic control of memory T-cell generation and stemness. Cold Spring Harb Perspect Biol. 2021;13: a037770. 10.1101/cshperspect.a037770 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 71.Galili G, Höfgen R. Metabolic engineering of amino acids and storage proteins in plants. Metab Eng. 2002;4:3–11. 10.1006/mben.2001.0203 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 72.Benfey PN, Chua NH. Regulated genes in transgenic plants. Science. 1979;1989(244):174–81. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 73.Wu J, Woodard RW. New insights into the evolutionary links relating to the 3-deoxy-D-arabino-heptulosonate 7-phosphate synthase subfamilies. J Biol Chem. 2006;281:4042–8. 10.1074/jbc.M512223200 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 74.Kavil S, Otti G, Bouvaine S, Armitage A, Maruthi MN. PAL1 gene of the phenylpropanoid pathway increases resistance to the Cassava brown streak virus in cassava. Virol J. 2021;18:184. 10.1186/s12985-021-01649-2 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 75.Görlach J, Raesecke HR, Rentsch D, Regenass M, Roy P, Zala M, Keel C, Boller T, Amrhein N, Schmid J. Temporally distinct accumulation of transcripts encoding enzymes of the prechorismate pathway in elicitor-treated, cultured tomato cells. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 1995;92:3166–70. 10.1073/pnas.92.8.3166 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 76.Pradhan S, Esteve PO. Mammalian DNA (cytosine-5) methyltransferases and their expression. Clin Immunol. 2003;109:6–16. 10.1016/S1521-6616(03)00204-3 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 77.Zimmermann P. The immunological interplay between vaccination and the intestinal microbiota. Npj Vaccines. 2023;8:24. 10.1038/s41541-023-00627-9 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 78.de Jong SE, Olin A, Pulendran B. The impact of the microbiome on immunity to vaccination in humans. Cell Host Microbe. 2020;28:169–79. 10.1016/j.chom.2020.06.014 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 79.Oh JZ, Ravindran R, Chassaing B, Carvalho FA, Maddur MS, Bower M, Hakimpour P, Gill KP, Nakaya HI, Yarovinsky F, et al. TLR5-mediated sensing of gut microbiota is necessary for antibody responses to seasonal influenza vaccination. Immunity. 2014;41:478–92. 10.1016/j.immuni.2014.08.009 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 80.Harris VC, Armah G, Fuentes S, Korpela KE, Parashar U, Victor JC, Tate J, de Weerth C, Giaquinto C, Wiersinga WJ, et al. Significant correlation between the infant gut microbiome and rotavirus vaccine response in rural Ghana. J Infect Dis. 2017;215:34–41. 10.1093/infdis/jiw518 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
Supplementary Materials
Data Availability Statement
The study data are not publicly available owing to ethical and regulatory restrictions on participant privacy. However, a pseudonymized individual study dataset will be made available from the corresponding author upon request.