Table 5.
No | Country | Method | Type of material | Case | Control | Study | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Case | Control | M | U | M | U | ||||
1 | France | QAMA | Peripheral blood ( 873) | Peripheral blood ( 980) | 17% | 83% | 16% | 84% | [12] |
2 | Ukraine | MSP | Tumor tissue ( 50) | – | 50% | 50% | – | – | [10] |
3 | Brazil | MSP | Tumor tissue ( 50) | – | 44% | 56% | [13] | ||
4 | Israel | QAMA | Peripheral blood ( 100) | Peripheral blood ( 89) | 0% | 100% | 0% | 100% | [14] |
5 | Nigeria | MSP | Peripheral blood ( 14) | – | 57% | 43% | – | – | [15] |
6 | Tunis | MSP | Tumor tissue ( 117)/paired normal tissues ( 65) | Non-tumor tissue ( 21) | 69%/5% | 31%/95% | 0% | 100% | [16] |
7 | Korea | MS-MLPA | Tumor tissue ( 60)/paired normal tissues ( 60) | – | 2%/0% | 98%/100% | – | – | [17] |
8 | Turkey | MS-MLPA | Tumor tissue ( 77)/paired normal tissues ( 77) | – | 0%/0% | 100%/100% | – | – | [18] |
MS-MLPA – methylation-specific multiplex ligation-dependent probe amplification; MSP – methylation-specific PCR; QAMA – quantitative analysis of methylated alleles; M – methylated; U – unmethylated.