Skip to main content
. 2013 Jun 6;2013(6):CD009560. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD009560.pub2

Liu 2008.

Methods Parallel randomised controlled clinical trial
Comparative study design (2‐sided confidence interval)
Randomisation ratio: 1:1
Participants Inclusion criteria: primary hyperuricaemia, blood uric acid concentration > 420 mmol/L (male), > 360 mmol/L (female); TG > 117 mmol/L; age: 18 ‐ 75 years old; participants without using uric acid‐lowering drugs
Exclusion criteria: acute gout episode patients; secondary hyperuricaemia patients; patients with severe primary co‐morbidities on heart, liver, renal and blood systems and mental disorders
Diagnostic criteria: not mentioned in the original article
Interventions Number of study centres: 1
Treatment before study: not mentioned in the original article
Titration period: 4 weeks
Outcomes Outcomes reported in abstract of publication: blood uric acid, TG
Study details Run‐in period: not mentioned in the original article
Study terminated before regular end: no
Publication details Language of publication: Chinese
Unclear funding
Publication status: peer review journal
Stated aim of study Quote: "To investigate the clinical effectiveness and safety of Zhusuanhuoxue decoction on the patients suffered from primary hyperuricaemia combined with hypertriglyceridaemia."
Notes TG: triglycerides
Risk of bias
Bias Authors' judgement Support for judgement
Adequate sequence generation Low risk Quote: "Random number table was used to distribute the 60 participants to two groups"
Allocation concealment Unclear risk Comment: no detailed information
Blinding of participants and personnel (performance bias) 
 All outcomes Unclear risk Comment: no detailed information
Blinding of outcome assessment (detection bias) 
 All outcomes Unclear risk Comment: no detailed information
Incomplete outcome data addressed 
 All outcomes Low risk Comment: no missing data
Free of selective reporting Low risk Comment: all the prespecified outcomes in the methods section of the article were reported in the results section
Free of other bias Unclear risk Comment: no information on the basic characteristics of the two groups of participants and no information on funding