Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2024 Sep 8.
Published in final edited form as: Nat Protoc. 2024 May 3;19(9):2712–2738. doi: 10.1038/s41596-024-00994-0

Table 1 |.

Comparison of main organoid generation approaches

Reference Format Variability Applications Considerations/uniqueness
Eiraku et al.5 Guided Low Genetic disease, drug dosing, drug screening Low variability is attractive for drug screening; development and metabolomics may be influenced by presence of insulin in some protocols; may not have spontaneous inhibitory neuron development49
Lancaster et al.19 Unguided High Lissencephalies, genetic disease, whole brain development Spontaneous development of multiple brain regions; high cell diversity, high organoid to organoid variability. Newer adaptations can produce neural oscillations21
Trujillo et al.7 Guided or ‘semi-guided’ Medium (Extended Data Fig. 2) Genetic disease, metabolic disease, population level spontaneous electrical activity, drug dosing/screening Spontaneous emergence of physiologically relevant oscillatory activity from functional excitatory–inhibitory neuron development; expected tradeoff of efficiency/variability due to semi-guided nature, long-term developmental scale. Can be used only to model cortical-born interneurons, not ganglionic eminence-born interneurons or migration of interneurons to the cortex. Resultant organoids follow the neurodevelopment of the human brain