Table 2.
Pathway-level analysis shows downregulated expression of genes involved in immune/inflammatory processes after sparsentan treatment
| Up Pathways |
Down Pathways |
||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Control vs. EIC |
EIC vs. EIC+S120 |
EIC vs. EIC+S60 |
|||
| Pathway | P Value | Pathway | P Value | Pathway | P Value |
| Cytokine-mediated signaling pathway | 2.53E-08 | Cytokine-mediated signaling pathway | 2.97E-09 | Cellular response to type I interferon | 1.49E-08 |
| Cellular response to type I interferon | 2.53E-08 | Cellular response to type I interferon | 3.87E-09 | Type I interferon signaling pathway | 1.49E-08 |
| Type I interferon signaling pathway | 2.53E-08 | Type I interferon signaling pathway | 3.87E-09 | Cytokine-mediated signaling pathway | 2.90E-07 |
| Neutrophil activation involved in immune response | 3.52E-05 | Neutrophil activation involved in immune response | 1.24E-05 | Neutrophil activation involved in immune response | 0.001 |
| Neutrophil degranulation | 6.37E-05 | Neutrophil degranulation | 2.40E-05 | Neutrophil degranulation | 0.002 |
| Neutrophil-mediated immunity | 8.22E-05 | Neutrophil-mediated immunity (GO:0002446) | 3.08E-05 | Antigen processing and presentation of exogenous peptide antigen via MHC class I | 0.002 |
| Cellular response to cytokine stimulus | 7.33E-04 | Cellular response to cytokine stimulus | 0.001 | Neutrophil-mediated immunity | 0.002 |
| Antigen processing and presentation of exogenous peptide antigen via MHC class I | 0.003 | Antigen processing and presentation of exogenous peptide antigen via MHC class I | 0.001 | Response to interferon-gamma | 0.003 |
| Response to interferon-gamma | 0.004 | Response to interferon-gamma | 0.001 | Response to interferon-beta | 0.005 |
| Response to cytokine | 0.004 | Antigen processing and presentation of exogenous peptide antigen via MHC class I, tap-dependent | 0.003 | Antigen processing and presentation of exogenous peptide antigen via MHC class I, tap-dependent) | 0.005 |
WGCNA analysis between grouped pairs (Control vs. EIC, EIC vs. EIC + S120, EIC vs. EIC + S60) was performed to find module eigengenes that correlate with glomerular phenotypes (nuclei per glomerulus and Ki-67 positivity). Genes from the modules significantly associated with the cellular phenotypes were then grouped and subjected to GSEA GO biological process pathway analysis. Top 10 pathways for each pairwise analysis are shown. LFC of genes within each pathway were identified using DESeq2 data and found to be decreased compared with the LFC of the upregulated genes in control vs. EIC. DESeq2, differential expression analysis for sequence 2; EIC, engineered immune complexes; GO, gene ontology; GSEA, gene set enrichment analysis; INF, interferon; LFC, log2 fold change; MHC1, major histocompatibility complex class I; S60, sparsentan 60 mg/kg; S120, sparsentan 120 mg/kg; WGCNA, weighted gene correlation network analysis.