Table 3.
The results of the optimized hierarchical mixed-effects multiple linear regression analysis (n = 15,042).
Predictor | F | P |
---|---|---|
Intercept | 136.285 | < 0.0005 |
Rater’s age | 0.126 | 0.722 |
Rater’s experience | 0.926 | 0.337 |
Rater’s sex | 9.577 | 0.002 |
Rater’s specialty | 0.455 | 0.635 |
Photomodel’s facial index | 103.608 | < 0.00000005 |
Photomodel’s midline deviation | 132.975 | < 0.00000005 |
Photomodel’s midline roll | 39.720 | < 0.00000005 |
Rater’s sex × Rater’s specialty | 3.062 | 0.048 |
Rater’s sex × Model’s midline deviation | 3.458 | 0.001 |
Rater’s specialty × Model’s midline deviation | 4.925 | < 0.00000005 |
Rater’s sex × Model’s midline roll | 3.281 | 0.003 |
Rater’s specialty × Model’s midline roll | 2.002 | 0.021 |
Significant values are in bold.