Table 1.
State-of-art techniques used in Type-2 diabetes Prediction.
| Technique | Algorithm | Data Type | Overall Accuracy | Remark |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ML Technique Ahamed et al. [2] |
LR | Tabular Data | 75.2 % | Used in assessing diabetes from pre-existing data using feature selection. |
| XGB | 83.3 % | |||
| GBC | 94.1 % | |||
| DT | 94.4 % | |||
| RF | 94.8 % | |||
| LGBM | 95.2 % | |||
| ML Technique Kulkarni et al. [38] |
XGB | ECG data | 96.8 % | The study is limited to the early detection of diabetes. |
| ML Technique Ahmed et al. [39] |
NB | Tabular Data | 86.1 % | Prediction of diabetes from the pre-existing tabular data by feature selection. |
| DT | 96.8 % | |||
| GBC | 91.0 % | |||
| CA Approach Saha and Saha [40] | RCT | Real-time blood sample data | 95.0 % | The approach is invasive and needs frequent finger pricking. |
| ML Technique Shen et al. [41] |
NB | IoT and Embedded systems for real-time data | 84.1 % | The approach is invasive and needs finger pricking. |
| J48 | 99.7 % | |||
| LR | 86.0 % | |||
| RF | 99.6 % |