Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2024 Sep 9.
Published in final edited form as: Neuroimage. 2024 Jul 17;297:120723. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2024.120723

Table 1.

Likert scale used to rate the tractography results.

Score Quality Description
1 Not reconstructed The tract failed to be reconstructed.
2 Poor The tract is present but significantly deviates from the expected anatomical pathway or includes incorrect routes. It may also suffer from very sparse streamline density, making the tract challenging to identify confidently.
3 Fair The tract generally follows the correct pathway with some deviations. The route is plausible, but minor inaccuracies in streamline alignment or density may affect its clarity or anatomical accuracy.
4 Good The tract closely adheres to the expected anatomical pathway with minimal deviations. The route accuracy is high, and the density of streamlines is sufficient to clearly define the tract’s structure without excessive sparsity or overcrowding.
5 Excellent The tract matches the expected anatomical pathway with no deviations. Streamline density is optimal, providing a detailed, clear, and anatomically precise representation of the tract.