Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2024 Sep 9.
Published in final edited form as: J Magn Reson. 2023 Jul 14;354:107523. doi: 10.1016/j.jmr.2023.107523

Figure 4:

Figure 4:

Simulated final magnetization mzfinal, after a sweep through resonance, plotted versus the unitless sweep rate α1. The Bloch equations were numerically integrated at (a) low intensity (B1=6.3μT, T2=0.45μs, and variable dΔB0/dt) and at (b-d) high intensity (dΔB0/dt=0.70mTμs1, variable B1, and T2 equal to (b) 0.45μs, (c) 2.25μs, and (d) 13.5μs). In the top plots we graph the varied parameter, dΔB0/dt in (a) and B1 in (b-d), versus α1, while on the bottom plots we graph the final magnetization. Open circles are the numerically computed magnetization. In (a), the solid line is eq. 25. In (b-d), the solid line is eq. 63 while the dotted line is the magnetization computed using the first-order Magnus expansion in eq. 56 taken in the 2βτ01, a0 limit.